HF Habs: 2024 NHL Draft Thread

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Who do you want at #5?

  • Tij Iginla

    Votes: 209 49.5%
  • Cole Eiserman

    Votes: 14 3.3%
  • Berkly Catton

    Votes: 92 21.8%
  • Konsta Helenius

    Votes: 13 3.1%
  • Beckett Sennecke

    Votes: 75 17.8%
  • Zayne Parekh

    Votes: 19 4.5%

  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.

Saundies

Fly On The Wall
Jun 8, 2012
3,217
4,642
NB, Canada
So if Demidov and Lindstrom are gone by 5, do we take a flyer on Sennecke, or go Buium? "Sounds like" Tij is out of the mix, if you believe the "Insiders."
If they're out of the mix, it's hard. Let's say I'm 'happier' going with a Buium or Dickinson than I am if they are there and we inexplicably pass on them for some reason to do it.

Basically, if either one of them is there and we don't take them, I really don't understand. If they're not, I understand further. I'm a 'please get a forward/we need forwards/why won't you just pick a foward' type of poster for this draft but I would at least hear them out if they felt Buium/Dickinson was truly the best players available based on their games over an Iginla/Sennecke.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
77,201
48,183
Now, after Demidov and Lindstrom, the forward are not equivalent to the top D. :P
Again, there’s no consensus on that. From what I’ve seen iginla’s ranked higher than Buium is. So’s Senecke.

There’s zero consensus out there at all. I’m is not a clear BPA. And again, most have Dickinson ranked higher than Buium.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaynki

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
77,201
48,183
If it goes Celebrini, Demidov, Levshunov, Lindstrom……ummmm….between Dickinson (who can play the right side) and Sennecke and his magic hands.

Would be happy with Iginla too
Guhle can play right side. Do we want to keep him there? No. I don’t know why we’d take Dickinson to play him on the right side too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NeptunesTrident

Schooner Guy

Registered User
Jun 23, 2006
13,795
13,807
It is when you have an overload at a position. How many times are you going to draft for the same spot? At this point it would be crazy to do it. Which is why it’s not going to happen.
I beg to differ. What's crazy would be passing up on a player your scouts have ranked far ahead of any other available player because of your organizational depth chart at different positions. That's losing sight of the big picture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaynki

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
77,201
48,183
I beg to differ. What's crazy would be passing up on a player your scouts have ranked far ahead of any other available player because of your organizational depth chart at different positions. That's losing sight of the big picture.
Who says he’s far ranked ahead of anyone?
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
51,328
55,337
So Michkov is playing for the Flyers next season. This should give even more confidence to the top 4 teams to draft Demidov.
 

Jaynki

Registered User
Feb 3, 2014
5,814
5,964
Again, there’s no consensus on that. From what I’ve seen iginla’s ranked higher than Buium is. So’s Senecke.

There’s zero consensus out there at all. I’m is not a clear BPA. And again, most have Dickinson ranked higher than Buium.
Indeed.

Draft cant come soon enough

Interesting week ahead
 

Riggins

Registered User
Jul 12, 2002
7,942
5,037
Vancouver, BC
This poster shits on every single amateur scout. It’s a bit of a vendetta it seems, maybe because it comes from a place of jealousy.

I wouldn't put much stock into Wheeler. Last year he had Fantilli to Anaheim, Smith to Columbus and Carlsson to SJ.

Pronman clearly has developed some connections over the years. His final mock will be interesting as he's nailed it the last couple years.

In 2022, in the top 6 all he messed up was Nemec and Jiricek in the wrong spots. It was bold at the time having Wright at #4. In 2023 he nailed the top 5.
 

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
14,816
16,408
Again, your point are valid and i also agree with every single one of them.

But i think they are a distraction in the process of selecting the best player in the 2024 draft.

I believe Buium has the potential to be a top 10D in the league. You are free to disagree. There is no valid reason for me to disregard this type of upside.

Imagine we are in the exact same spot and we hold the 1st OV pick in 2018 draft. Should we disregard Dahlin because we have Hutson and Guhle?
In 2018 Dahlin was clear cut 1OA (like Cenebrini) and Svechnikov was unanimous 2OA - both were a tier above test of draft cuvée at the time of the draft. Such is not the case after Celebrini as 1OA this draft
 

Jaynki

Registered User
Feb 3, 2014
5,814
5,964
In 2018 Dahlin was clear cut 1OA (like Cenebrini) and Svechnikov was unanimous 2OA - both were a tier above test of draft cuvée at the time of the draft. Such is not the case after Celebrini as 1OA this draft

Yes i agree.

But it was to highlights the facts that its all about aiming for upside.

The need, what we have, etc is a distraction.
 

Ozmodiar

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
6,197
7,480
Again, your point are valid and i also agree with every single one of them.

But i think they are a distraction in the process of selecting the best player in the 2024 draft.

I believe Buium has the potential to be a top 10D in the league. You are free to disagree. There is no valid reason for me to disregard this type of upside.

Imagine we are in the exact same spot and we hold the 1st OV pick in 2018 draft. Should we disregard Dahlin because we have Hutson and Guhle?
If Buium has top 10 potential, then so do 4 or 5 others in this draft if you believe countless rankings and mock drafts.

not sure why Dahlin is being used to draw some sort of equivalency. Undisputed #1 overall pick compared to (maybe) the 3rd D picked.
 

HuGo Burner Acc

Registered User
Mar 30, 2016
4,682
5,304
I think we should stop trying to galaxy brain it and just pick Catton or Iginla but thats just me.

Iginla is probably a better choice as Catton probably won't be able to dominate from the middle of the ice like he has up until now. They'll both probably have to become wingers and Iginla game won't be as hurt from doing so. Nothing against Catton but he's more of a perimeter player. Habs need to learn how to play on the inside more
 

Jaynki

Registered User
Feb 3, 2014
5,814
5,964
If Buium has top 10 potential, then so do 4 or 5 others in this draft if you believe countless rankings and mock drafts.

not sure why Dahlin is being used to draw some sort of equivalency. Undisputed #1 overall pick compared to (maybe) the 3rd D picked.

I dont draw any parralel between Dahlin and Buium

I just used this as an example to aim for highest upside instead of needs, fits or whatever distraction.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
77,201
48,183
That’s why God created trades.
How do you get the best players? You draft them. Once you draft them, you tend to hang onto them. That's why you rarely see big trades anymore.

It makes no sense to draft a blueliner now so we can try to trade a blueliner for a forward tomorrow. Just draft the forward.
 

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
54,116
68,829
If you think the forwards left are 2nd liners and a top pair D is available, who do you take? That’s the real decision.
Top pair D all day. Imagine if Dallas passed up on Harley because they had Heiskanen and Lindell. Not to mention that Suter was also in the top 4 a good bit of times meaning they had 4 LHD in the top 4. Obviously you'd like to have at least one RHD there which is why adding Tanev helped them out tremendously, but if a team like Dallas can do that despite having a top 5 dman in the NHL, I don't see why the Habs can't do the same.

I still think we're getting one of Demidov/Lindstrom, I doubt the Hawks are passing up on Levshunov because Demidov is one inch taller than expected.
 

SOLR

Registered User
Jun 4, 2006
13,202
6,741
Toronto / North York
My two cents on this whole thing. I've always seen Suzuki as a high IQ player, Matheson not so much. Matheson's skating is sublime. He can make a mistake and outskate an opposing player back to his own end. We've seen him do that before.

As for being more IQ tested, I'd say Suzuki's been far more successful on that front. He may not be a 100 point player but he's got strong two way play. Matheson shouldn't be a number one pairing blueliner. He's got great skills and can put pucks in the net but his defense leaves a lot to be desired.

Anyways, this probably isn't the thread for this conversation. But it's an interesting foil to look at this vs the upcoming draft from the perspective of physical ability vs IQ. To me, Matheson's success is borne out of his skating. He's one of the best in the NHL and it's served him (and us) really well. He's taken far too much abuse here but I wouldn't call him a high IQ player. I would with Suzuki.

Now try to explain how skating can be magically detached from IQ since it's mainly a coordination challenge. And how a fast player need to process the game often 30-40% faster than a slower player (Suzuki who is average). Matheson is higher IQ than Suzuki, his issue: he would have to be even higher IQ to just look like Suzuki who plays the same 10-15 plays over and over. Being a forward is a lot simpler than being a D.

The reverse case: Ribeiro was smart but was also slow, ie. a lot of his processing was going to recognizing patterns vs. moving.

The absolute case: McDavid is 2-3 standard of deviation faster, with the pattern recognition of Ribeiro (no tradeoff).
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CristianoRonaldo

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,015
12,113
Isn’t he a journalist for The Athletic? Surely through out his career he must have develop some connections.

The Athletic is a relatively new publication that brought in hacks like Wheeler and Pronman who have never worked in hockey. Just because he now has the opportunity to meet/interview some of these people does not give him an ounce of credibility as they don't share anything of value with an outsider like him. I know NHL players, who are mostly retired but I have had many opportunities to speak to players, executives, scouts and agents and they don't share certain things especially with media types like Wheeler who is not part of the club that people like myself were much closer to. I am not even remotely obtuse enough to ask certain questions because I know what the answer would be and the reason that they were cool with me was largely due to that level of respect. When a guy like Wheeler walks in the room there is collective hush that comes over these people and he is at best a necessary evil that they would sooner see go away than have to entertain on a phony level for any period of time.

It is important to understand that there are only a couple of media personalities that have earned enough respect to even allow the door to open a tiny crack like Mackenzie and Friedman and even they only get things that the team is ok with divulging and that does not include who they are going to draft. The only exception is Mackenzie getting the the scoop straight from the draft table moments before teams walk up to the podium and the pick has already been decided upon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SwiftyHab

dcyhabs

Registered User
May 30, 2008
4,420
2,655
Montreal
I like Buium way more than Dicksinson.
It really depends on how their games translate. I haven't seen much of either, but both put up pretty impressive stats. Buium may have inflated stats due to a good team or he may be an NHL star, at least in the regular season.

Dickinson may top out as a second pairing player but he could be an NHL playoff star.

It's really tough to judge ahead of time. In 5-10 years I'll look at hockeydb, do a couple of sorts, and say "obviously we should have taken whatever player wasn't really in consideration." It's really a matter of trying to end up with the guys who progress, and we have to hope the dinners and meetings gave some insight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoodKiwi

HabzSauce

Registered User
Jun 10, 2022
1,575
2,158
Catton produced at Crosby, Bedard level and he lost 5 ranks, really makes you think :loony:

Catton Saturday :dd:

This kid is so intriguing man. I'm not super high on him and would rather draft Buium, Demidov with our pick. He's in the next tier for me with Iginla & sennecke.

But man you cannot deny this dudes skill. Unreal player. Whoever gets him is going to look really good in a couple years
 
  • Like
Reactions: Team_Spirit
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad