Skip Bayless
The Skip Bayless Show
- Aug 28, 2014
- 21,885
- 25,673
We talking about that 160 pound stick that lives and breathes bigotry and bullying?
I'd slap a DND on him and move on
I like him more now.
We talking about that 160 pound stick that lives and breathes bigotry and bullying?
I'd slap a DND on him and move on
I’m surprised to be honest, I would’ve bet the farm that Buium did it for you.I'd lose it at Buium. Buium and Helenius are the least appealing options that have been discussed with the Habs.
I’m surprised to be honest, I would’ve bet the farm that Buium did it for you.
Helenius is not in the convo that seems clear.
Freewheeling like Parekh does is fine… for a team that doesn’t sport Lane Buium inspires me more of a structured player, but Dickinson would be my preferred option between the rest of the D. I’m looking for a minute cruncher with upside and size if I’m out of Demidov Lev Iggy or Lindstrom.
It should change his standing. I’d sell while his value is high and we know both of the top 4 RD spots are taken. I wouldn’t wait. You’re better off getting a veteran RD for the bottom pairing than having a guy who doesn’t offer much value defensively or has no chance to show what he has offensively.Mailloux is destined to be a 3rd pairing D at best, so drafting or not drafting Parekh doesn’t really affect his standing
His defensive and positional play came a long way in Laval this year. He has great assets to work with to keep on improving with that size, skating, wingspan and strength. Everyone has a hard on for Hutson but his defensive game has more question marks than Mailloux's.Yes, I also watched Ryan Poehling's NHL debut when he scored a hat trick and his "poor shooting" argument was apparently completely invalid because he had some nice goals. Mailloux was impressive in his first game but one game at the end of the season doesn't mean all his previous seasons of a questionable defensive game is not valid anymore.
I'm not denying his progression, he's just got a lot to work on defensively since it's been an issue for a while. If he turns into someone you can play on the PK then great, but it's definitely not something you can feel confident about given his resume and one game won't change that.
Cal has a 2nd first rd pick. Plus they’d have to throw in a prospect or another 2nd rd pick. Will depend how bad they want that player. Not saying it will happen but you just never know.How are Cgy going to swap 9OA for 4OA? When was the last time a team moved down or even traded a top-5 pick?
I wouldn't lose it if they went Parekh, I see the upside there.Understatement of the century.
If they go Parekh at 5 I will lose it.
Did that twice before got burnt hard. Kotkaniemi and Kostitsyn. Costs us Tkachuk and Parise. Probably 3-4 cups also. We had good teams in '06, '10, '14, '21.
Taking a guy rated way back based on good 2 months. I say again, Like I said then on here, I seen Brian Savage played like Coco Lemaire for 2 months. But it doesn't make him Lemaire. You want to learn through your mistakes. Base your draft on long term play.
wouldn't mind this result! but I would prefer moving up to nab Michael B-N at 15.
View attachment 880984
Parekh was CHL dman of the year, won the Memorial Cup and had one of the most productive seasons every by an OHL dman in his draft year with 33 goals and 96 points. He has unreal offensive gifts that cannot be coached. By all accounts, he worked hard on his defensive play this season and will continue to.I wouldn't lose it if they went Parekh, I see the upside there.
But I think Buium is better and have had him higher than Parekh most of the year. He had one of the best draft eligible years ever in NCAA history for a defenseman. He helped lead USA to gold and won the NCAA national title.
and Reinbacher is younger.Lindstrom//Demidov - Reinbacher. For sure.
Michkov have high offensive potential, but Lindstrom and Demidov are much complete player than him.
Reinbacher is in the same tier of Leshunov, the difference, Reinbacher is better at D zone, more safe choice between both.
I like Parekh, but the lackadaisical style irks me a bit. He needs to give a shit at the next level. That playstyle better not keep following him.Parekh was CHL dman of the year, won the Memorial Cup and had one of the most productive seasons every by an OHL dman in his draft year with 33 goals and 96 points. He has unreal offensive gifts that cannot be coached. By all accounts, he worked hard on his defensive play this season and will continue to.
My main concern with Parekh is that he's reckless and puts himself in situations where he gets absolutely tattooed. I worry about potential for concussion issues with this style of play.
Savage was Mr. October!Did that twice before got burnt hard. Kotkaniemi and Kostitsyn. Costs us Tkachuk and Parise. Probably 3-4 cups also. We had good teams in '06, '10, '14, '21.
Taking a guy rated way back based on good 2 months. I say again, Like I said then on here, I seen Brian Savage played like Coco Lemaire for 2 months. But it doesn't make him Lemaire. You want to learn through your mistakes. Base your draft on long term play.
can you imagine some of the past "all stars" who had done things way worse, before muh-feelings?He's a beast, but hfboards has gone woke. Sad!
Whats the red flags on Iginla??Demidov, Lindstrom, Catton, Dickinson, Buium, Iginla and Sennecke
To me those could all end up being worth the 5th.
But they also all have potential red flags…
Yup, Parekh had a great year too. I just have more concerns about his defensive game compared to Buium and generally his engagement and his upright stance.Parekh was CHL dman of the year, won the Memorial Cup and had one of the most productive seasons every by an OHL dman in his draft year with 33 goals and 96 points. He has unreal offensive gifts that cannot be coached. By all accounts, he worked hard on his defensive play this season and will continue to.
My main concern with Parekh is that he's reckless and puts himself in situations where he gets absolutely tattooed. I worry about potential for concussion issues with this style of play.
I wouldn’t say it’s a red flag, but he’s not the fastest, isn’t the strongest, cheats defensively. Nothing glaring though.Whats the red flags on Iginla??
Sure Hutson has more of a questionable defensive game, but neither are projected to be good enough to feel comfortable putting them in penalty-killing situations.His defensive and positional play came a long way in Laval this year. He has great assets to work with to keep on improving with that size, skating, wingspan and strength. Everyone has a hard on for Hutson but his defensive game has more question marks than Mailloux's.
To a certain degree, and it's mostly for forwards. We've got everyone losing their minds at how bad Matheson is yet he's 9th in points for dmen this season.We've been crying for decades to get offensive players. When we have them, we shouldn't be looking at getting rid of them early in their development stages.
Parekh might not be Karlsson pre-achilles but he's a still a very fluid skater. He flies through the neutral zone at high speed. If the Habs do pick him, he'll be the most offensively gifted player we'll have drafted in decades. He'll add 10 points per season to Slaf's, Suzuki's and Caufield's totals. It would be the end of our PP woes.I like Parekh, but the lackadaisical style irks me a bit. He needs to give a shit at the next level. That playstyle better not keep following him.
He plays like Karlsson, but Karlsson is a phenomenal skater. Parekh can’t afford to play at 75% with his lack of physical tools.
So I just listened to the podcast StevenIves was on and what he's saying about Nygard and why he places him so high is.
1. He does more Little things to win a hockey game then any 18 year old
2. He played in the 2nd best Swedish league but didn't put up big numbers which is why he's ranked in the lower teens but in international play he was phenomenal
3. Best Defensive Winger in the entire draft. He's so good that that when he moved up into the Swedish men's league later in the season the coach trusted him enough to play at center. That rarely happens for a an 18 year old in the top men's league in Sweden. and when he played center he did really well.
4. Big, physical one of the fastest forwards in the draft
5 He's so versatile that he could potentially be used up and down the lineup in different situations and succeed
6. Elite level shot, Elite IQ and likes to go to the net where most goals are scored in the NHL
7. All purpose player
8. His player comparison is which is pretty lofty but he thinks he can do it is "Faster Mark Stone"
------
So basically he's not a potential 80-100 pt player like some in the draft but he'll give you 60pts while making sure his team doesn't get scored on while he's on the ice.
A player like that can me way more valuable in tough games and in the playoffs.
Here's the podcast he was on where he goes through his rankings and talks about them in depth.
Mike Grier would get charged for public indecency by running around naked if he came out with Celebrini+Silayev.I expect New Jersey to take him at #10. He's exactly what that organization needs. They'd be dumb not to take him.
First 15 picks:
1. SJS: Celebrini
2. Chi: Levshunov
3. Ana: Dickinson
4. CBJ: Lindstrom
5. Mont: Demidov
6. Utah: Buium
7. Ott: Yakemchuk or Parekh
8. Sea: Yakemchuk or Parekh
9. Calg: Iginla
10. NJ: MBN
11. Buf: Sennecke or Helenius
12. Phil: Sennecke, Helenius or Catton
13. SJS: Silayev
14. Minnesota: Sennecke, Helenius, Catton or Eiserman
15. Detroit: Same as above.
Mike Grier would get charged for public indecency by running around naked if he came out with Celebrini+Silayev.