HuGort
Registered User
That's true enough. I was sky high on FantilliWho predicted Carlsson over Fantili last year?
That's true enough. I was sky high on FantilliWho predicted Carlsson over Fantili last year?
Assuming all of these players are available when the Habs pick, how would you rank these combinations?
Demidov + Reinbacher
Lindstrom + Reinbacher
Michkov + Levshunov
Michkov + Parekh
Personally, I prefer the first ones with Reinbacher.
How are Cgy going to swap 9OA for 4OA? When was the last time a team moved down or even traded a top-5 pick?Calgary is a wild card. If Lindstrom goes top 3 and they think we might take Iginla I could see them swapping with Columbus. Would mean Demidov would be available at our pick.
After Demidov, I love all 3 of those you mentioned: Dickinsion, Buium and Silayev. Each can bring such an impact to our group.Dickinson, Silayev or Buium may be too much to resist. Buium may turn out to be the gem of the entire draft
Lots of momentum in here for Dickinson over the last week based on a strong 3rd period in a Memorial Cup final game that London lost but were heavily favoured to win.
Not much talk on how Dickinson was asleep throughout the 1st period when London couldn't get the puck out of their zone or how he got turned inside out in the neutral zone in the 2nd period on Saginaw's 3rd goal. He was also on the ice when the winner was scored with 21 seconds left.
This is the story of Dickinson. Very talented with terrific tools (what a skater!) and size but also very inconsistent (falls asleep often) and not physical.
Unlike what many others have been saying, I don't see it as a crime if we leave him on the draft board and take the best forward available. Like every player in this draft with the exception of Celebrini, Dickinson has question marks and could go anywhere in the top 10.
You mean Utah has the 6th overall pickHypothetical question: Demidov is gone and Dickinson is still there at 5. Say Utah likes him. Would you do a pick swap (5 for 7) + Connor Geekie? Montreal ends up with with Geekie + 7 and Utah gets 5.
Yes that’s what I meant. CorrectedYou mean Utah has the 6th overall pick
Our 5th for Utah's 6th + Geekie?
That's a no brainer for me. I would pick Buium or Silayev and have Geekie
That would be a no brainer for me. But, highly unlikely! Geekie is unproven and they would probably not want to give him up just to move up for Dickinson in my opinionYes that’s what I meant. Corrected
For the record, Ol' Prongs is 6"6.I was wondering whats up with Dickinson
just figured out
hes channeling pronger
View attachment 880876
Neither team would want either of those players. And no team would trade that much for either.I am all in for a d at 5 : Dickinson or Buium.
However if it's the case we should trade either Matheson or Arber for example to have an other pick in the Top 11.
So NJ at 10th or Buffalo at 11th and we draft one of those 3: Sennecke, Catton or Iginla.
That would be an awesome draft !!
All I'm saying is there wasn't nearly as much top 5 talk around here for him before the Memorial Cup. The same question marks in his play are still there and if he was such an "obvious easy pick", he'd be top 3. He's in that same tier as so many in this draft who could go anywhere from 2-10. Lots of strengths but some question marks too.I don't think its just his memorial cup although there was a lot of eyes on him there.
Its the overall profile but also the fact that he is a member of the London Knight which is probably the best organisation in the CHL and so many great NHLers have come from this organisation. This teams actually operate like a real professional team.
Dickinson is such an obvious easy pick.
Pronger was one of the meanest to ever play the game. Dickinson's the opposite in that sense.I was wondering whats up with Dickinson
just figured out
hes channeling pronger
View attachment 880876
I find the lack of real buzz around Helenius reminds me of Dvorsky last year. Another really solid overall centerEiserman & Helenius not getting much buzz it seems. I think both will end up being good players.
Probably when Ottawa and Colorado traded around Duchesne I think. But it wasn’t a draft day trade.How are Cgy going to swap 9OA for 4OA? When was the last time a team moved down or even traded a top-5 pick?
Didn’t that trade happen in Nov (start of the season?). Sens we’re going for it, no one anticipated how it would actually end up w a bottom feeder iircI find the lack of real buzz around Helenius reminds me of Dvorsky last year. Another really solid overall center
Probably when Ottawa and Colorado traded around Duchesne I think. But it wasn’t a draft day trade.
In the unlikely event both of them survive through the first four picks, I would guess (and it is just that, a guess) that the Canadiens would lean toward taking Lindstrom (more on that in a bit). If just one of Lindstrom or Demidov is available at No. 5, that makes the decision somewhat easier for the Canadiens.
But in the equally unlikely event that neither of them is available, I think the Canadiens would lean toward taking a defenceman. And I don’t think they would trade down later in the top 10 to recoup an asset and take one of the top wingers available in either Tij Iginla or Beckett Sennecke, because they view the No. 5 pick as an opportunity to add a significant piece in their rebuild, and trading down would lessen the likelihood that player is a significant piece.
Nobody know for sure in my view.Basu just dropped an article, he guesses they would go Lindstrom over Demidov if both available. And a D is very possible if both are gone.
He goes on to mention they like Buium and Parekh a lot! No mention of Dickinson. Maybe we can kill the Iginla and Sennecke debates and start up the Buium vs. Parekh ones.
Basu just dropped an article, he guesses they would go Lindstrom over Demidov if both available. And a D is very possible if both are gone.
He goes on to mention they like Buium and Parekh a lot! No mention of Dickinson. Maybe we can kill the Iginla and Sennecke debates and start up the Buium vs. Parekh ones.
I think you’re right man. As I said, it wasn’t draft day trade, but it’s the last time a top five was traded( although not known to be top five at the time). I feel like it’s been close to 20 years since we’ve seen a known top five pick traded. There were the Sdin pick trades and possibly 03 with Fleury? Not sureDidn’t that trade happen in Nov (start of the season?). Sens we’re going for it, no one anticipated how it would actually end up w a bottom feeder iirc
After that memorial cup and now his combine testing, I have a feeling Dickinson will go top 4Basu said Lindstrom before Demidov and i’m damn happy about it.
And if we go D, better be Dickinson.