Toggle sidebar

HF Habs: 2024 NHL Draft Thread

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates

Who do you want at #5?

  • Tij Iginla

    Votes: 209 49.5%

  • Cole Eiserman

    Votes: 14 3.3%

  • Berkly Catton

    Votes: 92 21.8%

  • Konsta Helenius

    Votes: 13 3.1%

  • Beckett Sennecke

    Votes: 75 17.8%

  • Zayne Parekh

    Votes: 19 4.5%
  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.
Reader mode
Gally11 said:
On the flip side the power play would be outrageous and our first PK unit would be elite, all you would need is an average second unit. Not saying it’s what I would do but I can see the appeal.

Also we’d spend a ton of time in O zone 5 on 5
Click to expand...
Is there any healthy team that plays 2 dmen on a PP unit consistently anymore? If Guhle-Reinbacher is our first PK unit, we'd probably have the worst 2nd unit in the league with Xhekaj-Parekh/Mailloux.

I disagree about the O zone time given that they are probably all separated and their partner will be covering for them more often than not.

If we do draft Parekh, Mailloux is probably gone once all three of them show they can be good NHLers. You can't have those 3 on a defense.
 
WeThreeKings said:
Engstrom has too, as has other guys but they like to have handedness in it's natural spot wherever possible when building a team.
Click to expand...
I don't know if that's true. They had Guhle and Harris play a lot on their off side this year and seemed fine with it. They will find a way to get the 6 best defenseman out there as long as they show the ability to play it.
 
TheBuriedHab said:
I don't know if that's true. They had Guhle and Harris play a lot on their off side this year and seemed fine with it. They will find a way to get the 6 best defenseman out there as long as they show the ability to play it.
Click to expand...

Reinbacher's handedness played a part in his selection last year, they said as much, too. So they clearly value it.
 
WeThreeKings said:
Reinbacher's handedness played a part in his selection last year, they said as much, too. So they clearly value it.
Click to expand...

They value it, but its not the end all be all. If there was a better defenseman that Reinbacher last year that shot left but played on the right side would they still take Reinbacher over him? We don't know that.
 
The Great Weal said:
Is there any healthy team that plays 2 dmen on a PP unit consistently anymore? If Guhle-Reinbacher is our first PK unit, we'd probably have the worst 2nd unit in the league with Xhekaj-Parekh/Mailloux.

I disagree about the O zone time given that they are probably all separated and their partner will be covering for them more often than not.

If we do draft Parekh, Mailloux is probably gone once all three of them show they can be good NHLers. You can't have those 3 on a defense.
Click to expand...

I think just because teams don’t deploy two D on a PP unit now doesn’t mean we can’t attempt it and be successful at it if we’ve built an offensive D corps. Lane is not your typical D man with how deep he goes in o zone, so you can try to deploy different strategies if that’s where your best players are.

There’s also two PP units if there are two PK units to be concerned about lol.

As for Mailloux I firmly believe he’s going to be a lot better defensively than this crowd gives him credit for based on what I’ve seen watching him live late this season. I find him to be very underrated around here.

Xhekaj is still a bit of unknown for me but I think he has a lot more to offer and will work towards it.

So while I respect your opinion, I simply disagree
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rozz, HabzSauce, Simarino and 2 others
WeThreeKings said:
Engstrom has too, as has other guys but they like to have handedness in it's natural spot wherever possible when building a team.



Buium's defensive game is overstated, and Parekh is understated, I think they both have the same question marks defensively.. Buiums game is so similar to Hutsons that Parekhs dimensions are a better add.



Same risk with Buium.
Click to expand...
I agree that Parekh's defensive game gets overly shit on, but Buium is the best defensively after Silayev of the big 6 in this draft IMO. His offense won't translate as well I don't think, but he is fantastic defensively and is a one man breakout machine.

Also laughable that Basu is trying to stir up the Russian factor for Demidov. He's been nothing but clear that he wants to come to NA as soon as his contract is up, and is in fact why he got shafted the whole year by being stuck in the MHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garnet76
SannywithoutCompy said:
Also laughable that Basu is trying to stir up the Russian factor for Demidov. He's been nothing but clear that he wants to come to NA as soon as his contract is up, and is in fact why he got shafted the whole year by being stuck in the MHL.
Click to expand...
Did you read the article? He's reporting on questions being discussed by hockey ops people from NHL teams at the Combine (SKA pressure to sign an extension, two brothers belonging to SKA, entire family in the area). Also you mentioned that he got shafted by being stuck in the MHL. If he doesn't sign an extension with SKA, he'll almost assuredly be back in the MHL for another full season as they can't loan a player in their final year of a KHL contract.

NHL teams don't draft these kids in a vacuum and situations evolve as we get more information. North American media aren't getting a lot of information from Russia so these gatherings of hockey ops people from teams throughout the NHL like the draft Combine is the best place to hear all the scuttlebutt. Basu's simply reporting on discussions taking place at the Combine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HabzSauce, Andrei79, sandviper and 2 others
Gally11 said:
I think just because teams don’t deploy two D on a PP unit now doesn’t mean we can’t attempt it and be successful at it if we’ve built an offensive D corps. Lane is not your typical D man with how deep he goes in o zone, so you can try to deploy different strategies if that’s where your best players are.
Click to expand...
But it’s not exactly a recipe for success. Looking at the actual championship defenses, they are mostly 2 way guys as opposed to having half their defense being pure offense.
Gally11 said:
There’s also two PP units if there are two PK units to be concerned about lol.
Click to expand...
I’m aware, the impression based on what current teams are doing is that 2 of Hutson/Parekh/Mailloux would each be on one unit leaving one to not play much.
Gally11 said:
As for Mailloux I firmly believe he’s going to be a lot better defensively than this crowd gives him credit for based on what I’ve seen watching him live late this season. I find him to be very underrated around here.
Click to expand...
His defensive game has been an issue for a while. Of course I expect him to improve because otherwise he’d have a hard time cracking any defense let alone one of a “championship defense”.
Gally11 said:
Xhekaj is still a bit of unknown for me but I think he has a lot more to offer and will work towards it.
Click to expand...
Having an unknown as your 3rd best dman defensively should immediately be a red flag.
Gally11 said:
So while I respect your opinion, I simply disagree
Click to expand...
Having half the defense be pure offense is pretty much unprecedented. Not to mention that you won’t get the unreal production you’d expect on paper due to the fact that ice time and opportunities won’t be favoured to one player. Everyone thought the Sharks would be a championship team because they had two of the best offensive dmen in the league and it hurt them badly.

If we do draft Parekh, I’d wager that at least one of the three dmen would be traded in the near future.
 
The Great Weal said:
His defensive game has been an issue for a while. Of course I expect him to improve because otherwise he’d have a hard time cracking any defense let alone one of a “championship defense”.
Click to expand...
Did you watch Mailloux in his NHL debut against a Red Wings team that absolutely had to win that game? I was very impressed by his play. He looked so composed, played an almost flawless game and even produced a point. I was far more impressed by Mailloux's all around game than I was Hutson's.

Also keep in mind Mailloux played very little hockey in his draft year and his D+1 year and has showed great progression in the last two seasons. He made the AHL All Star Game as a true AHL rookie at age 20. He has some very raw upside and he's just starting to scratch surface. He could be an absolute gem by the time he's 25 years old. We've made enough huge mistakes trading 1st round D long before they became finished products.
 
  • Like
Reactions: habsfan891, HabzSauce, Garnet76 and 4 others
Riggins said:
Hutson and Parekh on the same blue line seems pretty risky. I'd go Buium too.
Click to expand...
Yeah, considering one would be thrown into PK duties whenever a D took a penalty.

Parekh has played some PK this season but not ideal. Hutson, no.

Much more comfortable with Buium there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themilosh
SannywithoutCompy said:
I agree that Parekh's defensive game gets overly shit on, but Buium is the best defensively after Silayev of the big 6 in this draft IMO. His offense won't translate as well I don't think, but he is fantastic defensively and is a one man breakout machine.

Also laughable that Basu is trying to stir up the Russian factor for Demidov. He's been nothing but clear that he wants to come to NA as soon as his contract is up, and is in fact why he got shafted the whole year by being stuck in the MHL.
Click to expand...

Basu is saying the same thing that the Athletic podcast stated and other insiders have stated.. Demidov tantalizes a lot of teams but they do have concerns about CSKA, with Demidov's brothers, trying to push him into a long term deal OR throwing him back in the MHL again next year.

Both items aren't ideal.. so again it's a bit of that Michkov fear again, when you aren't sure they are unequivocally better than your other option, you want to take the lower risk profile when you're talking top ten picks.

Again, it's a guesstimation but it is a consideration. That consideration or Lindstrom's medicals might be the only reason we are likely to have a shot at one of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei79 and themilosh
Schooner Guy said:
Did you watch Mailloux in his NHL debut against a Red Wings team that absolutely had to win that game? I was very impressed by his play. He looked so composed, played an almost flawless game and even produced a point. I was far more impressed by Mailloux's all around game than I was Hutson's.
Click to expand...
Yes, I also watched Ryan Poehling's NHL debut when he scored a hat trick and his "poor shooting" argument was apparently completely invalid because he had some nice goals. Mailloux was impressive in his first game but one game at the end of the season doesn't mean all his previous seasons of a questionable defensive game is not valid anymore.
Schooner Guy said:
Also keep in mind Mailloux played very little hockey in his draft year and his D+1 year and has showed great progression in the last two seasons. He made the AHL All Star Game as a true AHL rookie at age 20. He has some very raw upside and he's just starting to scratch surface. He could be an absolute gem by the time he's 25 years old. We've made enough huge mistakes trading 1st round D long before they became finished products.
Click to expand...
I'm not denying his progression, he's just got a lot to work on defensively since it's been an issue for a while. If he turns into someone you can play on the PK then great, but it's definitely not something you can feel confident about given his resume and one game won't change that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77, Vachon23, Andrei79 and 1 other person
Seb said:
Assuming all of these players are available when the Habs pick, how would you rank these combinations?

Demidov + Reinbacher
Lindstrom + Reinbacher
Michkov + Levshunov
Michkov + Parekh

Personally, I prefer the first ones with Reinbacher.
Click to expand...

Lindstrom//Demidov - Reinbacher. For sure.

Michkov have high offensive potential, but Lindstrom and Demidov are much complete player than him.

Reinbacher is in the same tier of Leshunov, the difference, Reinbacher is better at D zone, more safe choice between both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei79 and themilosh
Reader mode
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom