You keep saying people are missing the points... your points are simply not rational.
They're perfectly rational, people just think you can omnipotently know how ready a player is before they step into an NHL training camp. Sometimes... sometimes not.
Why are you worried about keeping a hypothetical 2nd overall pick happy?
Is that a serious question..? You should always be showing good faith with players you invest a lot in.
(If you fear a 2nd overall pick staying 4 years to ufa, Thats irrational crazytown.)
No, that's not what I said. But did you not just see Cutter Gauthier force his way out of his drafted team? Let's not act like things are impossible when you tick players off.
If not that why do you think theres an issue of telling him to stay at Michigan State?
There's not an "issue" if you are convinced he is not ready, or he expresses a desire to go back to Michigan State. If he expresses a desire to turn Professional, I disagree on being so hastily to shut that door.
If they "don't know if he's nhl/ahl ready" then Davidson and the scouting/development staff should all be replaced.
No, you're being completely irrational.
That's literally part of their job to think though now, before drafting him.
Why do players subject to the CHL Transfer Agreement try out in NHL Training Camps, sometimes get extended looks, sometimes play NHL games and get sent back, sometimes stay up...? If it's "literally part of their job", all of that is just a big waste of time?
There's no mystery, consensus is absolutely he has jumped 3 levels in 3 years, he needs some stability and college is still a great development situation. He absolutely should stay.
OK, and he may want to stay, he may not. I imagine part of this interview process is determining all of that.