WeThreeKings
Demidov is a HAB
If Demidov scores 100 points in a Habs jersey he would be a generational player for the Habs.
In fairness Josh Anderson almost always looks like an AHL playerHlinka. Demidov was a year younger. I think skill wise there's no denying Michkov is more skilled. But i've been watching hockey since the mid 80ies and one of the most skilled player to wear a CH uniform was Vladimir Malakhov. Skills is not everything. I think most people would tell you Demidov is the more complete player of the two.
Slafkovski was in the same Hlinka tournament if i remember correctly and did very well. He was older though and not as good as Michkov and about the same as Demidov despite being much older. Slafkovski being drafted 1st overall was almost solely on his wc tournament where he was MILES better than NHL players like Josh Anderson. I rember watching that game Slovakia against Canada and Slafkovski looked like a tier or two above Josh Anderson he made him look like a AHL player.
Buffalo and Ottawa already in our rearview bud.They better worry about just getting past Buffalo and Ottawa and out of the basement.
I’ll take your word for it friend!He's of course not a generational McDavid level talent but this is an overcorrection imo. Demidov isn't a "normal" prospect who's going to need another year in Russia, 2 years in the AHL, and then have to work his way up from the third line. If it weren't for the KHL contract he'd be on our opening night roster this October.
Slafkovsky, Kotkaniemi, Galchenyuk, and even guys like Mete/De la Rose were able to make NHL impacts at 18/19. Demidov is significantly more talented than all of them and he'll debut at 19. We don't need to worry about if his game can translate as if he's Joshua Roy or Sean Farrell.
Honestly no they shouldn't unless they expect him to be McDavid or something. It's OK to be excited about drafting him and there's not really a compelling reason to downplay how good he is. He's going to be in the top six on our opening night roster in 2025 and will never look back.
Personally if I'm going to try Demidov at Center. I'd put him on the 2nd line with Dach. For one, Slafkovsky and Suzuki have good chemistry. Plus you could rotate Dach and Demidov taking face offs on their strong sides.Anybody thinking about Demidov at center? He has said that he likes playing center so not sure about how that plays out. Lets say he does play center. What does your forward roster look like now?
Slaf / Demidov / Caufield
Newhook / Suzuki / Dach
Roy / Hage / Beck
Xhekaj / Kapanen / Mesar
If Roy is generational then so is Brodeur.Missing a few
Richard
Lafleur
Beliveau
Roy
very close but not generational
Bobby Hull
Marcel Dionne
Martin Brodeur
Chris Pronger
Raymond Bourque
Scott Niedermeyer
Mike Bossy
In Quebec saying that Hasek is the best of those 3 is a possibility of 25 years in jail..If Roy is generational then so is Brodeur.
My opinion, I think Hasek is the only true generational goalie. Then Brodeur and Roy in the superstar/franchise/whatever tier.
Not including anyone before the 90s because A) never saw them play and B) position has changed so much
Mtl never had a generational player..never.
Lafleur was an elite player but not generational. Lafleur was an average player past 29 years old.
Look the stats of Lemieux and Wayne past their prime...Lafleur in not on that level at all..
Look at Crosby..what he does at 36.
You are righe about Lindros.. Lindros was a generational prospect and he had an awesome start of his career but not long enough.
Lafleur was damn near generational. He just smoked like a chimney between periods and partied A lot! That’s why by 30 he slowed. He was top of the league at that timeMtl never had a generational player..never.
Lafleur was an elite player but not generational. Lafleur was an average player past 29 years old.
Look the stats of Lemieux and Wayne past their prime...Lafleur in not on that level at all..
Look at Crosby..what he does at 36.
You are righe about Lindros.. Lindros was a generational prospect and he had an awesome start of his career but not long enough.
Roy is the goat come on now! When it counted most ie: the playoffs, Roy was clutch.Hasek is the goat but Roy was in the same tier. Brodeur was in the second tier.
If Demidov scores 100 points in a Habs jersey he would be a generational player for the Habs.
Anybody thinking about Demidov at center? He has said that he likes playing center so not sure about how that plays out. Lets say he does play center. What does your forward roster look like now?
Slaf / Demidov / Caufield
Newhook / Suzuki / Dach
Roy / Hage / Beck
Xhekaj / Kapanen / Mesar
I’d also add that players now have training programs, eat well, etc. Lafleur would smoke in between periods lolSo you obviously recall that devastating purposeful knee on knee to Pat Boutette in Round 1 vs Whalers of 1980 playoffs - with no non invasive knee procedures of that time?
It’s like saying Bobby Orr isn’t generational because his knees were toast by age 27..
*WhenIf Demidov scores 100 points in a Habs jersey he would be a generational player for the Habs.
I’d rather Dach works at C.
I’d also add that players now have training programs, eat well, etc. Lafleur would smoke in between periods lol
Guy is one of the 5 greatest Habs ever, and top 20 in NHL history.Lafleur was damn near generational. He just smoked like a chimney between periods and partied A lot! That’s why by 30 he slowed. He was top of the league at that time
Morenz & Vézina were right up there in that period as well..Habs had the NHL's 1st generation, generational player. Newsy Lalonde. After that, a whole shit ton of franchise players. Generational players are just that, players that come along every generation.
Guy Lafleur was not a generational player.
Look around everywhere and nobody outside Montréal are saying that he was one.
Lafleur was done at 29.. Lafleur was the best player in the world in the mid 70s for about 5 years.
One thing Don Cherry always maintained has stood out to me, to paraphrase:By the time he was 29 he had a 104 even strength points season which was the best in history. Only Gretzky beat that (not even Mario which is crazy!!)
In his prime years, PP minutes were basically at their lowest, 30-50% less then in the 80’s/early 90’s. Lafleur’s prime is underrated because of that.
In 1979, before Gretzky, if we compare prime years which is all that matters to me, he was the best offensive player to ever play the game, and second best player ever after Orr, IMO. I don’t know how that isn’t generational.
Edit: for reference, in his best season, Mcdavid had 75 ES points to 71 PP points, and that includes 3v3 hockey…and we all know how dominant he his 5v5…
20 minutes of Demidov praise, enjoy