JoelWarlord
Registered User
I think the controversial thing is more that you started this discussion by sayingDemidov is great but will need great playres on his line. Not even sure how it's a controversial opinion...lolll
"who the f*** will Demidov be on par with on this team so that they'd be able to follow his vision? Who scores on this team apart from Caufield? Chances are if we don't add to it. we will think Demidov is a dud in the NHL 'cause he gets no point when he actually nobody will be able to complete his plays..."
I don't know if you intended to come off this way, but the way you phrased the first post on this topic reads as declaring that something is a problem through a rhetorical question despite there being pretty obvious answers to the question between Slafkovsky, Suzuki, and Laine. The take is controversial because people disagree that the problem you've identified and presented is actually a problem in the first place. "Is Demidov, Caufield, Laine, Suzuki, and Slafkovsky enough scoring talent to contend with if Demidov is the best player" is a reasonable question that I think a lot of people share, but I think the idea that we are so bereft of talent that Demidov will look like a dud unless he plays with Caufield is pretty overdramatic.
For example, you hinted at Michkov with the "if only we could have drafted a talented scorer" thing and he's currently PPG with Konecny, Tippett, Couturier, Laughton, and Poehling as his linemates this year and Drysdale as the PP1 QB. I don't think that group compares favourably to Slafkovsky, Laine, Suzuki, Caufield, Dach, and Newhook plus Hutson as the PP1 QB.