Kevin Musto
Hard for Bedard
- Feb 16, 2018
- 22,629
- 29,301
You'd really have to question Kyle Davidson if he signed Guentzel to a big 7 year contract.
I can't see it happening.
I can't see it happening.
I’ll be honest, if we get 5 years of PPG production out of Guentzel, it’s worth it. And it’s not like we have a glut of players to pay at this point. The only contract coming up in the next two years with a big raise is Bedard. Nobody else has proven anything. It doesn’t affect the cap structure at all.Timeline doesn’t fit but Jake would be a great get to go with bedard
Arvidsson 3x5Alright so we don’t want Guentzel, fine. So post your ideas on who we’re signing at what amount and for how long to make sure Bedard isn’t alone.
The only realistic options you posted are Kane and Henrique. All the other players will get way more term. This isn’t like last year. The cap went way up and will do so again next year. GMs will be willing to give out big deals.Arvidsson 3x5
Domi 2x4
Kane 2x6.5
Roslovic 3x4
Tuevo 4x5.5
Stephenson 5x5.5
Henrique 3x4.5
Are realistic options IMO
The only realistic options you posted are Kane and Henrique. All the other players will get way more term. This isn’t like last year. The cap went way up and will do so again next year. GMs will be willing to give out big deals.
going off this
I would do Stephenson for 6.25 X 6
Anderson was good in the shutdown role with Dickinson. He can stay and fill a hole for the time being.
I honestly have no desire to see Hawks sign any of our RFA's/UFA's outside of Phillips and Crevier
Anderson would be only other potential one but honestly, he is meh who has a few games in which he looks good and then is invisible
Seems way more political than for hockey reasons, which I think is a mistake.
I just think they don't want to have to re-break people's hearts if they were to ship him out again. It is a bit of a marketing/PR nightmare.Seems way more political than for hockey reasons, which I think is a mistake.
I doubt it's that at all. If they signed him they probably wouldn't trade him especially considering the limited return they got last time.I just think they don't want to have to re-break people's hearts if they were to ship him out again. It is a bit of a marketing/PR nightmare.
Also, it seems like Patty still desires chasing Lord Stanley, which I commend. so, I hope he goes on to find more success.
You don’t have to worry about Necas. Reports are they want a budding superstar since they view him as such, not a bunch of pucks and prospects. We have nothing to offer them that matches that.If we don't get Kane back, don't draft Demidov, and trade (and sign) for Necas, Imma be pissed.
It would be like management is crossing off a list of things I don't want.
Yeah I’ll pass on Teuvo. Good player but we are gonna end up like the 2010s Oilers if we accumulate a bunch of small guys up frontI am fine with throwing a bunch of $ at him if he signs 3-4 year deal. Overpaying $ wise for that woudln't be bad for Hawks
5-7 years = Nope
In end though I would rather bring back Teravainen