- Jan 18, 2016
- 34,911
- 26,068
That’s at best a lateral move. And would be expensive.Are we getting Laughton for 3C?
That’s at best a lateral move. And would be expensive.Are we getting Laughton for 3C?
That would be a big pile of meh.Are we getting Laughton for 3C?
There IS NO "cheaper and actual center" that would be available...Trading Colton to replace him with a cheaper and actual center wouldn’t be the worst idea for the 3C
We don't need late 1sts. We need value contracts, cap space, and roster upgrades.Can we even get back what we paid Colton for? Would a team give up a late 1st for him?
So much this. A cheaper upgrade on Colton will cost ~ a 1st+Guly/Behrens+ most likely. And realistically I don’t think there’s any way anyone who fits that bill is readily available.Alright, since this continues to be a weird topic of discussion, the people who think we're going to magically trade him and upgrade our roster AND get cap space....
Who is going to fit that bill? A realistic trade option for Ross Colton that is an upgrade on him as a 3C AND has a cheaper cap hit.
Sissons. Saves you 1.15m, PK1, PP2, similar production (on Nashville).Alright, since this continues to be a weird topic of discussion, the people who think we're going to magically trade him and upgrade our roster AND get cap space....
Who is going to fit that bill? A realistic trade option for Ross Colton that is an upgrade on him as a 3C AND has a cheaper cap hit.
Well, not exactly the same position. McDonagh was basically given the option to find himself a place where he wanted to go, or a list of options. Goodrow didn't get that chance. That said I agree, he will deal with it. He will probably be sour on Drury and the Rangers, but a team like NYR can get away with treating their players a bit questionably. People still want to go there.Ryan McDonagh was faced with the same situation as Goodrow, yet he was a fantastic soldier for Nashville. Just because Goodrow didn't want to waive his NTC and might be upset about it does not mean he will have a shitty attitude. Goodrow is known for being a very high quality leader and the pros pro.
Well, Laine didn't really want out of Winnipeg. He was chased out of there by some of their core pieces. Funny, how that also coincides with Bufyglien quitting. And also Ehlers wants out of there now.This isn't a Laine type attitude.
Alright, I'm going to be THAT guy (someone who only looks at generic/everyday stats)....Sissons. Saves you 1.15m, PK1, PP2, similar production (on Nashville).
Forsberg or Josi...Sissons + Saros
For
Georgiev + 2024 1st + Colton + someone fill in the blank
Trading Colton to replace him with a cheaper and actual center wouldn’t be the worst idea for the 3C
If you want to replace Colton you’re either downgrading in talent and cap hit or paying an exorbitant amount amount of assets to get a cheaper upgrade.
Cheaper will be worse.
In the cup year we had JTC who produced better in the playoffs than Colton did in this playoffs and JTC was actually solid defensively. He was only making 500K less than Colton but my point is, maybe the Avs can find a 3C who’s making 3 mill instead of 4 and is actually a defensive center who can be trusted when things get rough in the playoffs. Even saving a mill is something for the Avs who will be cap crunchedThere IS NO "cheaper and actual center" that would be available...
Not one that wouldn't cost a ton in trade assets, nor one that would be cheaper than 4M AAV as a UFA (and I don't think there is one to be had in UFA).
He produced 40 points, you're also not getting that production either.
This whole idea to trade him AFTER the Avs spent so much time identifying this role as something worthy of trading a former 1st round pick (before his value bottomed out), and then signed him to term and gave a NTC, is very weird.
Can we even get back what we paid Colton for? Would a team give up a late 1st for him?
In the cup year we had JTC who produced better in the playoffs than Colton did in this playoffs and JTC was actually solid defensively. He was only making 500K less than Colton but my point is, maybe the Avs can find a 3C who’s making 3 mill instead of 4 and is actually a defensive center who can be trusted when things get rough in the playoffs. Even saving a mill is something for the Avs who will be cap crunched
Nuke?Sissons + Saros
For
Georgiev + 2024 1st + Colton + someone fill in the blank
Columbus can't do anything about their geographical location. However, their efforts to attract and retain talent has included the following progression of head coaching hires.....Tortorella to Larsen to Babcock to Vincent. It's like they have been actively trying to drive talent away. With the Arizona Coyotes in a "paused" state, the Blue Jackets are now the most inept organization in the league.Well, not exactly the same position. McDonagh was basically given the option to find himself a place where he wanted to go, or a list of options. Goodrow didn't get that chance. That said I agree, he will deal with it. He will probably be sour on Drury and the Rangers, but a team like NYR can get away with treating their players a bit questionably. People still want to go there.
Well, Laine didn't really want out of Winnipeg. He was chased out of there by some of their core pieces. Funny, how that also coincides with Bufyglien quitting. And also Ehlers wants out of there now.
And who can really blame anyone for wanting out of Columbus lol.
Alright, since this continues to be a weird topic of discussion, the people who think we're going to magically trade him and upgrade our roster AND get cap space....
Who is going to fit that bill? A realistic trade option for Ross Colton that is an upgrade on him as a 3C AND has a cheaper cap hit.
I wouldn't say Bjugstad is better defensively, but the point of taking a hit at center to address other areas would be it.I don't think there's a good answer to this question. I think the concept of trading Colton (if Colorado really did it) means the Avalanche are willingly taking a hit at 3C to address other areas.
Throwing out a potential trade: Bjugstad (50%, $1.05M) <-> Colton ($4M).
That would save the Avs a hair under $3M, and Bjugstad is the better defensive player. But he's also a wildly inconsistent 32-year-old journeyman with only one year left on his deal. It would be an absolute band-aid of trade, made only for Colorado to use that $3M elsewhere.
I wouldn't say Bjugstad is better defensively, but the point of taking a hit at center to address other areas would be it.
For the money, you're generally not going to get a better 3C. If you offered up Winnipeg Ritchie + 24 1st + Colton + another thing for Lowry, maybe you get there, but people would rage at it. Generally, we'd be looking at a step or two worse 3C to save ~1.5m.
It would take something absurd to the point of everyone here would burn Denver like Vancouver after a game 7.I'd pay so much to get Lowry. But I can't see Winnipeg ever moving him.