UncleRisto
Not Great, Bob!
Finally. Parise, then Suter, separately.Suter.
Finally. Parise, then Suter, separately.Suter.
No, you delete.
Do your job
Now now kids, behave yourselves or you gonna get spankedNo, you do your job
You get spankedNow now kids, behave yourselves or you gonna get spanked
Tbh if I’m giving a discount to a team I want to stay with, I’m making my sure it’s buyout proof too. The agent won’t let his client get ripped off.Drouin is trying to get a "buyout proof" medium term deal. Seems like he doesn't actually believe he can keep up a high level of play and wants that insurance.
Would only come back if the bigger money isn't actually there.
Colton is move able but a replacement would be needed and they're actually going to try to give him more rope to play next season.
Front office is confident Kovalenko is a played. Bednar isn't so sure. May see him get buried early and never really have a chance.
What did I miss? Where is that from? Why are you posting this without source or context?Drouin is trying to get a "buyout proof" medium term deal. Seems like he doesn't actually believe he can keep up a high level of play and wants that insurance.
Would only come back if the bigger money isn't actually there.
Colton is move able but a replacement would be needed and they're actually going to try to give him more rope to play next season.
Front office is confident Kovalenko is a played. Bednar isn't so sure. May see him get buried early and never really have a chance.
Not on a discount. He'll take the most guaranteed dollars he can. From anyone as long as the contract total is in the $20s.Tbh if I’m giving a discount to a team I want to stay with, I’m making my sure it’s buyout proof too. The agent won’t let his client get ripped off.
He still seems to perform well against Nate, trade out Manson bring him on cheap.. And then bring boqvistWhat happened to Nate Schmidt, there was a time there where he looked pretty good
Manson was amazing last year for his cost but man, the downside risk is so high. Another injury filled year or just regression could sink us.He still seems to perform well against Nate, trade out Manson bring him on cheap.. And then bring boqvist
2024-25 | $8,000,000 | $6,125,000 | $0 | $1,694,444 | $1,694,444 | $6,305,556 | -$180,556 |
2025-26 | $7,300,000 | $6,125,000 | $0 | $1,694,444 | $1,694,444 | $5,605,556 | $519,444 |
2026-27 | $4,800,000 | $6,125,000 | $1,000,000 | $1,694,444 | $2,694,444 | $3,105,556 | $3,019,444 |
2027-28 | $4,800,000 | $6,125,000 | $0 | $1,694,444 | $1,694,444 | $3,105,556 | $3,019,444 |
2028-29 | $2,800,000 | $6,125,000 | $2,000,000 | $1,694,444 | $3,694,444 | $1,105,556 | $5,019,444 |
2029-30 | $2,800,000 | $6,125,000 | $2,000,000 | $1,694,444 | $3,694,444 | $1,105,556 | $5,019,444 |
2030-31 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1,694,444 | $1,694,444 | -$1,694,444 | $1,694,444 |
2031-32 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1,694,444 | $1,694,444 | -$1,694,444 | $1,694,444 |
2032-33 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1,694,444 | $1,694,444 | -$1,694,444 | $1,694,444 |
2033-34 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1,694,444 | $1,694,444 | -$1,694,444 | $1,694,444 |
2034-35 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1,694,444 | $1,694,444 | -$1,694,444 | $1,694,444 |
2035-36 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1,694,444 | $1,694,444 | -$1,694,444 | $1,694,444 |
Trade out Manson, sign Schmidt for bottom pair, sign Alexandre Carrier.Manson was amazing last year for his cost but man, the downside risk is so high. Another injury filled year or just regression could sink us.
No, you get spanked.Now now kids, behave yourselves or you gonna get spanked