Looking at all the transactions on the main board trade page……..
“Er, Gary. GM’s think playing into late June is as silly as fans think it is.”
They're 100% correct.
Looking at all the transactions on the main board trade page……..
“Er, Gary. GM’s think playing into late June is as silly as fans think it is.”
Gotta start somewhere. Build from the back out. Something Toronto never ever seems to get.By the time the Sens are ready to compete he will be 35.
Well they did trade Rask for Raycroft...Gotta start somewhere. Build from the back out. Something Toronto never ever seems to get.
Can’t say i agree with this. Bruins D without McAvoy is not something id enjoy watching.Nope, but I would move McAvoy for Tkachuck.
They retain on PLD for Ullmark? 50% retained PLD for Ullmark work for them and Boston?
If that was the deal McAvoy for Tkachuck, you could then look to a FA like Montour to take Cmac spot.Can’t say i agree with this. Bruins D without McAvoy is not something id enjoy watching.
He took heat for a PO’s where he tried to do too much. But sometimes you don’t know what you have until it’s gone.
Edit: Love Brady Tkachuk by the way. Just not right trade for me.
I’m with you. He’s going somewhere within a year, that’s for sure.Trying to figure out what is going on with Ullmark.
LA I am guessing is just a no on a trade. Maybe LA just wanted to move PLD and didn't care? Maybe they will buy out Kuemper? I still don't think Linus wants to go there
Devils---DId he not want to go there? Did the Bruins not like the return? Markstrom is 1 mil per cheaper, signed for 2 years, but I'm sorry he sucks. Did Sweeney not want to deal him in conference?
Ottawa is not a nice cityOttawa and Raleigh are both nice cities. Is Carolina still in the mix?
Agree. A young offensive d man is hard to find. Kids going to be good once he fills out and gets some more playing timeThe Bruins aren’t trading Lohrei. You can stop the discussion.
Too rich for me. I’m a Charlie Mac guy though. Through and through.If that was the deal McAvoy for Tkachuck, you could then look to a FA like Montour to take Cmac spot.
That’s(Markstrom) a big return for an over the hill goalie. If this set the precedent then bruins will be getting the world for Ullmark.All Eyes On Bruins, Ullmark Following Flurry Of Goalie Trades
The trade market for goalies is officially set following a pair of deals made on Wednesday afternoon. First reported by Travis Yost of TSN, the New Jersey Devils acquired netminder Jacob Markstrom in a trade with the Calgary Flames. In exchange, the Flames received 23-year-old defenseman Kevin...bostonhockeynow.com
Shots fired……Ottawa is not a nice city
It’s practically the gulag.
Going live at 630 again.
You guys may wanna drop on
As the article states, what happened today will make it much more difficult to deal Ullmark, especially given his no trade veto power. The time table is also getting tighter every day.That’s(Markstrom) a big return for an over the hill goalie. If this set the precedent then bruins will be getting the world for Ullmark.
You want Lohrei locked into the top6 or top4? You said top6 but then the context made me think you meant top4. Fwiw, I think he's locked into the top6 even if they get a veteran D. I think they break him in the way they did Krug, 3rd pair at ES (while he learns to defend in the NHL) and 1st PP.
I don't think there's any reality where they build a team that puts Geekie on the 4th line. He's a strong 3rd liner. I don't think they need to sign 4 forwards either, or 3 forwards for that matter. They need a 1c and they need a play driver to replace DeBrusk, preferably with a RW to play with Marchand. Other than Lindholm, the UFA options are meh, IMO.
Guentzel is the only 'play driver' in the UFA class, but he's going to get paid Pasta money and I don't think they can afford both Lindholm and Guentzel. Lindholm is the bigger priority.
Reinhart is a career 30/30 guy who had a great season and you're going to end up paying for 90 point Reinhart not 60 point Reinhart. I don't think he's a play driver and I don't think you can afford both Reinhart and Lindholm. Plus, Reinhart and Lindholm play the same spot on the PP.
Stamkos isn't coming here. He and Pasta play the same spot on the PP. I think "fit" matters and you only have one PP1 bumper. You are selling someone on having that job and those goals.
Marchessault is not a play driver, not young and looking to get paid. Laine has baggage that would give me pause and he plays the same spot on the PP as Pasta. Toffoli isn't a play driver. Perron isn't young and isn't a play driver...
I'd be down for Necas. I like the idea of using Ulmark for a secondary scorer but I'm also okay with them using him for a 1st round pick.
So, I think they're going to look at those less than perfect UFA fits and say, why get locked into a long, expensive contract for someone we're not sure is going to work. Let's take a flyer on someone cheap and see if Lysell or Merkulov can beat them out of a job. At least Lysell can be a dynamic play driver. Maybe he's still not mature enough, that seems to be the opinion of those in the know, but that's why you sign the vet as insurance. And, there are good fits on defense, guys who could be impactful players, so I think that's why they lean that way.
I agree that Chiarelli’s teams were tough, intimidating and fun to watch… and I agree that Sweeney’s teams for the most part have not been tough or intimidating, but I don’t think that was an issue for the Bruins this year. I thought they were just as physical as Florida. We had just as many blow up hits as they did and outhit them in the series overall. No, we weren’t the 2011 Bruins but we lost that series on skill not toughness IMO.
HE DOESN'T KNOW THAT YETOttawa is not a nice city
It’s practically the gulag.
I think this just confirmed my post.Vilardi was 23yr old top prospect coming off a 41pt season in 63gp.
Iaffalo was 29yrs old amd had put up 35p in 59gp the season before being traded
Kupari was a 23yr old depth guy
Durzi (how the 2nd was acquired) was 24yr old and had just put up 38pt in 72gp
I think there's more quality there than you think. Is it superstar quality? No. Durzi & Vilardi are very good pieces with upside however.
I imagine if ullmark ends up staying, the 50-50 split is over. Maybe 66-33, or even 70-30 sway....not exactly a desired position for a FA to be goalie. And he is meh in his games? Could be really bad for him
Anyone have the link…
I can only find previous shows.
Is this on? Am I missing it?Going live at 630 again.
You guys may wanna drop on