pucksindeep92
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2023
- 72
- 92
Make it Jakub Dvorak instead of Englund and it would be very intriguingWould anyone do Mason Lohrei + Linus Ullmark for Quinten Byfield + Andreas Englund?
Make it Jakub Dvorak instead of Englund and it would be very intriguingWould anyone do Mason Lohrei + Linus Ullmark for Quinten Byfield + Andreas Englund?
This seems like a pretty easy yes.Would anyone do Mason Lohrei + Linus Ullmark for Quinten Byfield + Andreas Englund?
I'm a no on basically all of those guys if the first player we're sending is Mason Lohrei.Wasn't Marc Savard universally considered an immature POS coach killer before he got to Bob Hartley? Maybe Zegras is as irredeemable as they say but don't you do your due diligence and figure out if your "winning culture" can straighten him out? If you're a no on Zegras and no on Lindholm and no on Stephenson then what do you do?
So, Peter Chiarelli!Holy shit, that's actually great ^
Edit: The gift basket story, lol.
I don't think LA would. Byfield turned the corner this past seasonWould anyone do Mason Lohrei + Linus Ullmark for Quinten Byfield + Andreas Englund?
If the cost for Zegras is the same as what Atlanta gave up for Savard I'd be up for taking a chance on him. I think Lohrei exceeds that that, though.Wasn't Marc Savard universally considered an immature POS coach killer before he got to Bob Hartley? Maybe Zegras is as irredeemable as they say but don't you do your due diligence and figure out if your "winning culture" can straighten him out? If you're a no on Zegras and no on Lindholm and no on Stephenson then what do you do?
Savard also had started turning that corner in Atlanta under Bob Hartley.Upside to Zegras is hes young and you have control for a few years plus.
The downside is he is a gamble. You dont know what you will get. Output + chemistry.
Sure Savard was a risk too but critical difference was he cost you $ and no talent going the other way. Thats important IMO.
Well they got Savard for free basically.If the cost for Zegras is the same as what Atlanta gave up for Savard I'd be up for taking a chance on him. I think Lohrei exceeds that that, though.
I'm also okay with picking up Lindholm or Stephenson too, as long as their cap hit isn't too ridiculous.
Lohrei has a ton of upside and will only get better with more experience at the NHL level.
Teams would be lining up if we wanted to trade him.
I keep him, unless someone is giving us a legit #1 center that is 27 YO or younger in the deal.
That list would include:
Larkin
Hintz
Thomas
Barzal
Stutzle
This is all fine and dandy, and yes, the skill is there but Zegras is baby shit soft. They'd absolutely have to address the wing situation and put someone who isn't constantly picking themselves up off the ice on there. Teams have a field day enough as it is with Pastrnak, Zegras would be much, much worse. At least Pastrnak will throw a body check.Savard also had started turning that corner in Atlanta under Bob Hartley.
I’m in on Zegras, personally. Depending on the cost. Natural skill level is off the charts. We’d need a banger on the left side to compliment, but imagine him a Pastrnak together? Would be difficult for me not to be excited.
That’s the kind of softness we can’t tolerate. Kid breaks an ankle and all of a sudden he can’t skate? Soft.He, uh, broke his ankle.
I think we would be forgetting any other mistakes that Don Sweeney has made because this would be the Mother of all mistakes. Find another way! The only way I include him is for a super-star player because IMHO Mason is going to be considered easily a top 10 defenseman in the league in several years. ML checks off so many tools/attributes of a top D-man.
If he does I will personally drive to Toronto and kick him in the balls. As well as any owner who happens to be nearby.Cant wait for Bettman to engineer another lockout.
Bettman being a commissioner is already embarrassing.If he does I will personally drive to Toronto and kick him in the balls. As well as any owner who happens to be nearby.
Another lockout would be embarrassing.
Ullmark for Chychrun (potentially with Ullmark ending up elsewhere because of NTCs) and then Frederic + Lorhei as a base for Zegras. Would you do it?
I do hope not. Trading Lohrei makes many of us sorry in the near future. I’m not great at this stuff, but he’s a slam dunk keeper for me.DS not trading Mason L
Make sure to stop in New York on the way because that's the office you would find him in.If he does I will personally drive to Toronto and kick him in the balls. As well as any owner who happens to be nearby.
Another lockout would be embarrassing.
How about just swapping RFA? Jeremy Swayman for Quinton Byfield.Would anyone do Mason Lohrei + Linus Ullmark for Quinten Byfield + Andreas Englund?
Agreed, and I’ve been part of that at times, regretfully. The tiresome part for me is it’s the same people that are 100 percent do no right and 100 percent do no wrong. If you take that out you can still find some real interesting back and forth.There has been a trend downward on here for a complete and utter lack of respect for people’s opinions.
Same things were said about Nathan Horton like you said the Bruins have a world class set up here that flat out make players better and more responsibleNot sure Frederic gets it done but let's say Ullmark for a pick, Lohrei and a pick for Zegras. Lot of possibilities there. Anaheim could retain for 2 years, would allow them to add a 2nd C or a wing and a LD, and Zegras's deal would end when Coyle's does.
Sure he might be a little immature and he has some things to work on but weren't they just on the brink of trading for Pierre-Luc Dubois? A winning culture and a strong leadership group go a long way. Buy low and get the benefit of the change of scenery for once.