Suntouchable13
Registered User
So he's a liar too? This is a bold faced lie. Just trying to protect his ass. I don't like this one bit.
It's bad either way. If it was Schneider's call which it wasn't completely, so why are we bringing the manager back who makes a decision like that?"I know players went into John's office after the game and basically said we know it wasn't your decision to pull Berríos." - Dan Shulman on Blair & Barker yesterday.
Someone is lying here. Or being mislead.
It's bad either way. If it was Schneider's call which it wasn't completely, so why are we bringing the manager back who makes a decision like that?
If it wasn't his call, then Atkins isn't taking ownership.
According to Atkins, Kikuchi allowing two runs was a solid outcome in that situation. Go figure.It’s not a good sign when the press doesn’t believe the story the gm is putting out there
If this is even remotely true he should be fired on that call alone. I don’t trust it was his decision but whoever made it should not be back. No consequences for that decision is unacceptable. Looks like I won’t be watching next year. Also it wasn’t a brave call it was a horrible call to pull Berrios. I’d feel the same even if Kikuchi had a clean inning
trust in this organization has been irreparably damaged from fans to management to coaches to players to the media.It's bad either way. If it was Schneider's call which it wasn't completely, so why are we bringing the manager back who makes a decision like that?
If it wasn't his call, then Atkins isn't taking ownership.
"I know players went into John's office after the game and basically said we know it wasn't your decision to pull Berríos." - Dan Shulman on Blair & Barker yesterday.
Someone is lying here. Or being mislead.
What do the overall pitching and offense have to do with that decision? It was a bad decision. Other aspects being good or bad doesn't mean that decision was good. Good on him for admitting offense wasn't good when the season is over. He had a chance to add offense and didn't. He doesn't get credit for that.Atkins defended Schneider, Mattingly, and Walker by saying the pitching management was a strength all season long including that game. Even though the decision was “unique”, the pitching gave up two runs. He put the blame on himself for placing too much belief in the offence turning it around.
Yes, I agree that the attendance will probably suffer, especially if there are not some changes made.I admit I will watch on tv but promise not to attend a single game (I usually attend a half dozen games a season) cause I’m a Jays fan since I attended their opening game in 1977. Only when avg attendance dips below an avg of 18 000 will ownership get rid of Shatkins.
What do the overall pitching and offense have to do with that decision? It was a bad decision. Other aspects being good or bad doesn't mean that decision was good. Good on him for admitting offense wasn't good when the season is over. He had a chance to add offense and didn't. He doesn't get credit for that.