Baring top 4, Reinbacher/Benson/Smith and Wood/Barlow/Leonard would have me very happy.
Im not the biggest Smith fan, but I can't deny the upside.
If they trade a top 20 pick for Dubois, whom I love, I will riot.
2024 picks + Harris should be more than enough.
Geekie is a better skater than Wood. Wood is a better skater than Robertson was in his draft year, and with the emphasis on skills teaching and whatever gospel Adam Nicholas has, I don't see why not.
He has best player in the draft upside.
He is not. He makes a lot of cutbacks, skates around in circles a lot but thats not being dynamic. Its something a lot of new and or bad scouting persons do. Cutbacks are nice, they are not however a sign of dynamism. Neither is circling around the zone with the puck and never finding the inside. (Moore).
His tools are going to limit him, he's not a good shooter, his playmaking is good but somewhat unimaginative and his size is going to limit him for sure. The upside is a Gallagher type of player without the sandpaper, thats not dynamic. Maybe a guy like Zuccarelo if he finds new skills along the way, but were reaching I think.
Moore, Lardis, Sawchyn, Heidt, Perron, Perrault, Molgaard and even Mukhanov all have similar strengths to Brindley.
Benson doesn't have skating concerns.
Its Bensons size vs Smiths passiveness/sawft play.
Strengths are similar, etc. Two high-end offensive players. Do you want the 5'10 Benson or the Sawft as butter Smith?
Smith is too much like Suzuki and Benson is too much like Farrell, IMO. Sucks but it is what it is.