Zach is out for the yearYeah. When Jenner came back they ticked up but I think they are still without Werenski which hurts too.
Zach is out for the yearYeah. When Jenner came back they ticked up but I think they are still without Werenski which hurts too.
I read that in my head like "Zock" because of DachZach is out for the year
I read that in my head like "Zock" because of Dach
Been a real rough year injury wise for the jacketsThat is a killer for them.
So yesterday on a sports radio channel here in Ottawa,the hosts of a show were taking about Connor Bedard and the 11 lottery teanswith a chance at him...
Maybe with tongue in cheek or maybe not,they said something like: we all know Chicago gets him....because that is what Gary wants!
So maybe they were just joking around ...butthey also implied that Bedard in Columbus or Anaheim or Arizona woukld not be what the NHL would like to maximize marketing potential and revenues from Bedard's superstardom trajectory ...and implied having a healthy Chicago market is very important to the NHL...
So they then ended the discussion with IF there are no "shenanigans"....ie. IF there is no "fix" then Bedard will end up with the luckiest team from the 11 with a chance at him...but maybe tgey were really asking if the lottery will be rigged to land hom in Chicago as tfe NHL's preferred optimal destination for him?
I have posted many times my feelings Hawks would not be so lucky in an honest lottery...Odds much much higher that hexwill end up with 1 of the other 10 teams having a chance at him ...
But the idea that the NHL might "fix" a lottery in favour of 1 preferred team might not be just a conspiracy theory ...We keep coming back to the Crosby draft and the suspicion the NHL could not afford Pittsburgh and one of its owners,Mario Lemieux,going bankrupt...that it would be a disaster for the NHL...so it is highly suspected tge NHL "fixed" it to bail our Mario and save the Pittsburgh franchise...
We can of course never find out the truth...which is why when a situation cones up that a "fix" solution seems like it might be the preference from an NHL optimal for revenues solution,one must not just laugh off the possibility for a non-kosher lottery.
However...no danger the Hawks go bankrupt...so not exactly the dire circumstances that were there in the Pittsburgh /Mario situation prior to that lottery ...
Yet for obvious reasons the NHL would like both a healthy arena filled Chicago market AND a large market and good time zone to maximize the Bedard revenue generating potential ...
So we can only bring up this topic with the idea that it cannot be dismissed outright....if only Hawks fans brought this up as a possible outcome,then that would be a fantasy wish...but the fact that it was Ottawa sportscaster bring up there could be a fix to satisfy NHL preferred location for Bedard for marketing and revenue maximization suggests it just might be in the works..
I will end with just saying that I fo nit believe luck will land us Bedard ...but rather that a healthy Chicago market generating top revenues plus the marketing opportunities to feed off the Bedard phenomenon are really both answered if he is "put" into the Chicago market...
Just saying what others are thinking...
Thanks for posting it … I guess.This is the best fiddy post I've ever read. Well done dude.
Question.Draft rankings st the allstar break..
1.Columbus
2.CHICAGO
3.Anaheim
4.Arizona
5.San Jose
6.Montreal
7.Vancouver
8.St.Louis
9.Philadelphia
10.Ottawa
11.Montreal(via FLA)
12.Detroit
13.Vancouver(via NYI)
14.Buffalo
15.Nashville
16.Calgary
Hawks would pick #2, #27(TB), #34, #59(TB), #66, #95(DAL) and #98
SameI’m no scout by any stretch, but I’m really liking Carlsson.
I’m no scout by any stretch, but I’m really liking Carlsson.
Question.
Would you A) Trade #2 for #6 and 11?
Or B) for #7 and 13?
I would do it for 6-11 but not 7-13.
6 gets you 1 of Michkov, Benson or Smith.
11 gets you 1 of Cristall, Yager or Ritchie
I’m just not sold on the 2 and 3 guys like others are.
Fantilli has 17 pts in his past 7 games with Michigan.I like him more than Fantilli to be honest. Fantilli has the better tools, Carlsson has the better hockey sense.
No. In several years the Hawks down the middle...Question.
Would you A) Trade #2 for #6 and 11?
Or B) for #7 and 13?
I would do it for 6-11 but not 7-13.
6 gets you 1 of Michkov, Benson or Smith.
11 gets you 1 of Cristall, Yager or Ritchie
I’m just not sold on the 2 and 3 guys like others are.
No.Question.
Would you A) Trade #2 for #6 and 11?
Or B) for #7 and 13?
I would do it for 6-11 but not 7-13.
6 gets you 1 of Michkov, Benson or Smith.
11 gets you 1 of Cristall, Yager or Ritchie
I’m just not sold on the 2 and 3 guys like others are.
I’m honestly not that shocked. Following sone of our younger guys who were recently drafted, a lot of them are playing really good hockey right now.Wheeler posting his minor league system rankings and he is down to 6 and not hit the Hawks yet. So top 5 system according to his ranking.
I haven’t watched enough to have an opinion on that, but it seems like Carlsson gets a bit overshadowed by the other two.I like him more than Fantilli to be honest. Fantilli has the better tools, Carlsson has the better hockey sense.
Cool, I just don’t see him as significantly better than others and the more I read/watch the more I like Michkov and Smith.No.
Draft Fantilli.
if the Hawks get moved down to 4 from 2 by neither MTL or VAN...sureQuestion.
Would you A) Trade #2 for #6 and 11?
Or B) for #7 and 13?
I would do it for 6-11 but not 7-13.
6 gets you 1 of Michkov, Benson or Smith.
11 gets you 1 of Cristall, Yager or Ritchie
I’m just not sold on the 2 and 3 guys like others are.
Montreal at 6 and 11 are looking at getting Will Smith and Ryan Leonard, both USDP centres...not too shabbyif the Hawks get moved down to 4 from 2 by neither MTL or VAN...sure