Toggle sidebar

HF Habs: 2023 NHL Draft part 2

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Goldenhands said:
All hockey experts seem to agree that you need size to win in playoffs. Andre Tourigny, Danny Dubé, Pierre Mcguire among some. Vegas' blueline is averaging 6'3, Boston Bruins had an all time reccord season with a big strong puck possession team. St-Louis Blues won a cup with a huge mobile blueline, Habs reached the Stanley cup finale with a mediocre foward crop and a big strong blueline + elite goaltending. Tampa won cups with Hedman 6'6, Sergachev 6'3, Mcdonagh 6'1, Ruuta 6'3, Cernak 6'4. Yeah they were pretty skilled up front, but their blueline was huge and talented.

We are drafting 5th OV and some folk want a 5'9 160 lbs winger or a soft playmaking center who will likely end up on the wing? I dont get it. Yeah Marchessault is pretty good, so are other undersized fowards, but you cant have too many of them on your team, we already have Caufield on our top 6 who has an elite trait, his goalscoring skills. Small skilled fowards are also easier to get later in the drafts, I mean Marchessault was not even drafted.

We have the opportunity to draft a big, smooth skating top RD with great puck poise, passing skills, physicality who is elite at breaking plays and who can generate offense by rushing the puck up ice or great outlet passses. We have the chance to add a big strong 2-way center with deadly shooting and puck possession skills. We have the opportunity to draft a great scoring powerwinger with deceptive speed, great hands, high end motor and competitiveness, but yeah, go for the sexiest picks that will wow you at times, but get crushed hard in playoffs...
Click to expand...
You mean hockey playoffs aren't a skills competition? And the draft isn't a hockey pool?

I swear many here must not watch the NHL playoffs and have no idea how the game changes. We got our Michkov 15th overall in 2019.

I mean...I'll be totally fine if we do take him as I know Habs brass are doing their due diligence but he's nowhere close to Bedard and has some question marks. I can't get over how many are acting as if a small average skating one dimensional player that they haven't watched play in 18 months is a must draft at #5. If he was such a can't miss prospect, he'd be taken at #2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bopeep, morhilane, Belial and 1 other person
Estimated_Prophet said:
Mike Keane is a bit of a stretch as Leonard is definitely a better skater with better hands but I agree that the comparisons with the Tkachuk brothers is also a poor one. I have said that Hyman is the best comp although he is also bigger than Leonard, perhaps J.T. Miller is his upside but once again Miller is still bigger than Leonard.

I see him as a hybrid of Hyman and Konecny if all goes well with his development.
Click to expand...
Mike Keane was a pretty good skater. They’re about the same size. He was always motoring. Hitting guys left and right. He even dropped the gloves once in a while. His offensive IQ was lower and the offence never got off the ground when he graduated to the NHL. His hands were below average while Leonards are above average. But Keane was very good defensively. Keane helped us win the Cup and was an important cog. I just wouldn’t take him at 5OA even if he doubled his goal output. But teams love having a player like that.
 
Goldenhands said:
All hockey experts seem to agree that you need size to win in playoffs. Andre Tourigny, Danny Dubé, Pierre Mcguire among some. Vegas' blueline is averaging 6'3, Boston Bruins had an all time reccord season with a big strong puck possession team. St-Louis Blues won a cup with a huge mobile blueline, Habs reached the Stanley cup finale with a mediocre foward crop and a big strong blueline + elite goaltending. Tampa won cups with Hedman 6'6, Sergachev 6'3, Mcdonagh 6'1, Ruuta 6'3, Cernak 6'4. Yeah they were pretty skilled up front, but their blueline was huge and talented.

We are drafting 5th OV and some folk want a 5'9 160 lbs winger or a soft playmaking center who will likely end up on the wing? I dont get it. Yeah Marchessault is pretty good, so are other undersized fowards, but you cant have too many of them on your team, we already have Caufield on our top 6 who has an elite trait, his goalscoring skills. Small skilled fowards are also easier to get later in the drafts, I mean Marchessault was not even drafted.

We have the opportunity to draft a big, smooth skating top RD with great puck poise, passing skills, physicality who is elite at breaking plays and who can generate offense by rushing the puck up ice or great outlet passses. We have the chance to add a big strong 2-way center with deadly shooting and puck possession skills. We have the opportunity to draft a great scoring powerwinger with deceptive speed, great hands, high end motor and competitiveness, but yeah, go for the sexiest picks that will wow you at times, but get crushed hard in playoffs...
Click to expand...
I think skilled player are a lot harder to find regardless of size than big D man that can skate most of these are available as UFA or in the 2nd/3rd round for each Marchessault you have 2 Chariot
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAVO16
Kennerback said:
Mike Keane was a pretty good skater. They’re about the same size. He was always motoring. Hitting guys left and right. He even dropped the gloves once in a while. His offensive IQ was lower and the offence never got off the ground when he graduated to the NHL. His hands were below average while Leonards are above average. But Keane was very good defensively. Keane helped us win the Cup and was an important cog. I just wouldn’t take him at 5OA even if he doubled his goal output. But teams love having a player like that.
Click to expand...
I loved Keaner but he and Leonard aren't similar players at all. Keane's career high is 16 goals. Leonard's a very gifted goal scorer with offensive tools and instincts across the board way above what Keane ever had.

Keane was never drafted and carved out a great career for himself by being a classic overachiever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Belial and Estimated_Prophet
Goldenhands said:


Skating the puck up ice: 2:03 and 2:20 min mark.

Long outlet passes: 5:18 5:28 5:46 mark
Click to expand...

I didn’t say he never did them. There are exception to the rules.

2:03- Love the breakout, his stick-handling is limited. That’s the upper limit of his stickhandling and deeking. We’re talking about a Top-5 pick here. Hughes drafted @4OA could pants Ds every which way.
2:20- Love the breakout again. Typical short simple pass, not much offensive creativity in those circumstances.

5:18- it’s a can’t miss pass situation. No traffic. He has two forwards alone. There’s no chance both miss the pass in their general vicinity.
5:28- Bobbles the puck reception, but makes a very good Cross-ice pass
5:46- This is my favorite play. Excellent high-skill pass off the boards.
 
Schooner Guy said:
You mean hockey playoffs aren't a skills competition? And the draft isn't a hockey pool?

I swear many here must not watch the NHL playoffs and have no idea how the game changes. We got our Michkov 15th overall in 2019.

I mean...I'll be totally fine if we do take him as I know Habs brass are doing their due diligence but he's nowhere close to Bedard and has some question marks. I can't get over how many are acting as if a small average skating one dimensional player that they haven't watched play in 18 months is a must draft at #5. If he was such a can't miss prospect, he'd be taken at #2.
Click to expand...
Well Michkov is a high end offensive talent, he is a magicien with the puck and a great goalscorer. The question marks are about the defensive side of his game, compete without the puck, but TBH, I havent watched him at all since the 2-3 games he played at the WJC 2 yrs ago where he looked like a young phenom. Thats why I am asking the same people who want him 5 OV if they at least watched him play this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bopeep, Schooner Guy and Andrei79
Kennerback said:
Mike Keane was a pretty good skater. They’re about the same size. He was always motoring. Hitting guys left and right. He even dropped the gloves once in a while. His offensive IQ was lower and the offence never got off the ground when he graduated to the NHL. His hands were below average while Leonards are above average. But Keane was very good defensively. Keane helped us win the Cup and was an important cog. I just wouldn’t take him at 5OA even if he doubled his goal output. But teams love having a player like that.
Click to expand...

I watched Keane's entire career and he was a favourite of mine but outside of his size/competitiveness he shares little in common with Leonard. Skating certainly was not a strength for Keane although his hustle and intelligence helped him to get to where he needed to be. Keane was a heart and soul grinder who killed penalties and banged in the odd garbage goal. Leonard i quite literally better at every aspect of the offensive game and is already heavier than Keane was. Leonard is a much better skater, much better shooter and has much better hands than Keane, it really isn't close.

I would love to have a couple of Keane's to fill out the bottom six as the guy was a flat out warrior and a winner.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bopeep, Gainesvillain, HabbyGuy and 1 other person
I am 100% confident with Reinbacher's puck rushing and transition passing. Where he'll be in some years, who knows, but he already does stuff that looks really really good on a regular basis against pros.

The projection with him is his in zone offense. Right now it's basic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAVO16, Mrb1p, bopeep and 1 other person
Goldenhands said:
Well Michkov is a high end offensive talent, he is a magicien with the puck and a great goalscorer. The question marks are about the defensive side of his game, compete without the puck, but TBH, I havent watched him at all since the 2-3 games he played at the WJC 2 yrs ago where he looked like a young phenom. Thats why I am asking the same people who want him 5 OV if they at least watched him play this year.
Click to expand...
I watched a few of his games but on video. The defensive aspect of the game is there but needs work in the same way Will Smith‘s needs work. He’s good at stealing pucks and his technical skills are there, but his mindset is too focused on offence. Compete without the puck is insufficient and needs work.

His two first step on the back check are anemic and need to be fixed. Once he’s off, he’s good on the backcheck follow through, and checks the stick. He’ll go down deep.

It’s fine to cherry pick a bit near your defensive blue line to receive a break out pass. But if his team bobbles the puck, he should be a half second quicker in getting back in defensive mode. When in the box he’s ok but should be consistently more aggressive.

On the forecheck he’s agressive if the player is close to him, but not agressive enough when he’s further.

But lots of his offensive opportunities start with him mugging the puck from a player. His skating stride reminds me a lot of Cammaleri’s. He’s faster than Benson and Dvorsky.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JAVO16 and Grate n Colorful Oz
calder candidate said:
I think skilled player are a lot harder to find regardless of size than big D man that can skate most of these are available as UFA or in the 2nd/3rd round for each Marchessault you have 2 Chariot
Click to expand...
Leonard is not the reincarnation of Steve Begin!

All that dipsy doodle we can see on those highlights for these highly skilled guys in junior are rarely translatable to the NHL, even less to the NHL playoffs.
 
Hockey93 said:
I’d be extremely disappointed with any of those 3 as our pick.

If we don’t draft Michkov I want Benson.
Click to expand...
Benson kid looks amazing not gonna lie but what's the percentage of his plays he pulls off in junior will actually translate to the next level?
 
Belial said:
Benson kid looks amazing not gonna lie but what's the percentage of his plays he pulls off in junior will actually translate to the next level?
Click to expand...

I'll play Devils advocate (I do really like Benson), but why does no one bring up Gilbert Brule as a possible Benson outcome?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fenris
Scott Wheeler on his Habs reddit AMA also said he doesn't see Montreal taking Michkov.

It's either the most elaborate smokescreen of all time, or just every person in the game has gotten the same feeling.

You'd think there would be someone saying the sense isn't Michkov but...
They aren't even getting the sense it's a remote possibility
 
WeThreeKings said:
Scott Wheeler on his Habs reddit AMA also said he doesn't see Montreal taking Michkov.

It's either the most elaborate smokescreen of all time, or just every person in the game has gotten the same feeling.

You'd think there would be someone saying the sense isn't Michkov but...
They aren't even getting the sense it's a remote possibility
Click to expand...
Did you hear that Nikolishin interview?
 
Mrb1p said:
You dont like Benson, if you would youd claim it high and loud.

Michkov and Benson are two players you dont have the balls to call upon.
Click to expand...
You just love players that are exciting and make plays more often than other players but you clearly have no idea what it takes to actually win a cup!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom