Very different players IMO. McTavish is more like a Horvat...shoot first and I think he'll be much more physical as he matures. Carlsson is much smoother and cerebral...I'm not sure I'd say pass first but more balanced between pass and shoot. Kopitar is my best comparable offensively.Just wondering.
Compared to McTavish what more does Carlsson bring?
John
Pretty much that, in terms of points you would envision that Carlsson puts up higher total of points.I completely disagree that Carlsson is a better two way player than Fantilli.
If anything, you draft Leo because you believe the offensive upside is higher
This is exactly correct. And the difficult task for the Ducks is to look at both players today and envision what they'll become in 3-5-7-10 years. I don't envy them. I think Carlsson is just scratching the surface of his talent. Meanwhile, Fantilli has all the skills in the world but how much more will he develop? I honestly don't know who I'd pick between the two of them at this point. So so close.I completely disagree that Carlsson is a better two way player than Fantilli.
If anything, you draft Leo because you believe the offensive upside is higher
Best comparable against their own ages was the U20 tournament. Carlsson was 3-3-6 in 7 games and Fantilli was 2-3-5 in 7 games.This may be an odd opinion but I thinkni probably would have preferred seeing the two against players their own age rather than adults. While I admit playing against men gives us a glimpse of how NHL ready they are I feel like against guys their own age you might see Carlsson offensive upside more.
I personally don't think either of them should be playing in the NHL next year but opinions vary. Carlsson worked his way into the conversation over the past week or so but Fantilli is still the betting favorite.So what becomes of either Fantilli or Carlsson next season? Stick with the Ducks? Return to his current team? AHL (I think each is eligible)?
Interesting that some of you think Carlsson is still a possibility. I had just assumed that Fantilli was a lock for 2OA.
Seeing him live 3 times and then also seeing other games on TV, I agree. That area would need to be improved for sure, he just seems to he alergic to cut down a bit and slow the game down to make the best decision.From the games I’ve watched fantilli loses a lot of pucks for no reason. I guess you can make the excuse of lack of chemistry with his teammates, but a lot of the turnovers do scream lower iq. Like can he really not slow the game down? I guess he’s just 18 as well but I don’t see the player many are describing in these games, I’m often left wondering what game are they watching?
He does manage to look for options when he's transitioning, but when he receives the puck he does take the rush decision every time. There could be many factors influencing him under these conditions, bigger players, faster pace, does he see the options, are his linemates open. Maybe the only place to find the answers to wether or not it's going to be an issue is his NCAA games, when he is comfortable with the pace, and in charge, does he do those things?Seeing him live 3 times and then also seeing other games on TV, I agree. That area would need to be improved for sure, he just seems to he alergic to cut down a bit and slow the game down to make the best decision.
He's still my favorite but this does concern me. We have 2 more games to watch him this tournament and I'm waiting for EP draft guite on 5th of May to keep evaluating him
Pretty much those are the only kind of players who can carry a 4th line as a 18 yearold into scoring against grown men/NHL veterans. Placing Fantilli with Lucic is like putting Carlsson with Silfverberg on a 4th line. Lucic on his line is like having a 200 pound iron ball chained to his legs, its a lot of weight to carry.I have no horse in this race, and barring the Finland game I haven't watched a single game that Canada has played (just some highlights on occasion), but it strikes me as odd to say that Fantilli has a problem with too high a game speed and bad reads.
I've seen footage and I can tell what people mean by that, but to me that looks more like putting a Lambo in a group of 30-year-old Ford Fiestas and complaining that the Lambo driver doesn't know how to coordinate checking in at your roadtrip accommodations properly because he arrives at the location three hours earlier than everybody else and gets all they keys from the reception. Put him on a line with guys who are attuned to playing at high speeds and making reads other people don't and he'll, in all likelihood, score.
Sure, that means that, at least right now, he's not going to elevate the entire roster into a cup contender the moment he's put in the lineup, but barring McDavid, Crosby, and maybe Bedard (if even) there's barely anybody who does that.
I have no horse in this race, and barring the Finland game I haven't watched a single game that Canada has played (just some highlights on occasion), but it strikes me as odd to say that Fantilli has a problem with too high a game speed and bad reads.
I've seen footage and I can tell what people mean by that, but to me that looks more like putting a Lambo in a group of 30-year-old Ford Fiestas and complaining that the Lambo driver doesn't know how to coordinate checking in at your roadtrip accommodations properly because he arrives at the location three hours earlier than everybody else and gets all they keys from the reception. Put him on a line with guys who are attuned to playing at high speeds and making reads other people don't and he'll, in all likelihood, score.
Sure, that means that, at least right now, he's not going to elevate the entire roster into a cup contender the moment he's put in the lineup, but barring McDavid, Crosby, and maybe Bedard (if even) there's barely anybody who does that.
If the Ducks draft Clelin Ferrell with #2 OA, we riot.We need to start drafting like the Raiders. Gut feelings from old men that are light headed from taking too much Viagra!
Fantilli saving his best for last it appears. You get the feeling with Fantilli that if his head catches up with his skills he could lead this tournament in scoring in a year or two. Tantalizing prospect.
Yeah, just want to emphasize that the "head" part to me is just adapting to the higher level of competition. As others have said, I think his hockey IQ is fine and might even be excellent with more experience. Carlsson is ahead of him in the level of competition area b/c he's been playing against men for most of the past year.Completely agree. My only reservation with Fantilli as a prospect is that the imo “head” part is the hardest to develop in a meaningful way. There are many examples of players who improved skating, shoot, got stronger ect, to make a big jump, but not a lot that all of a sudden became cerebrally elite.
Best comparable against their own ages was the U20 tournament. Carlsson was 3-3-6 in 7 games and Fantilli was 2-3-5 in 7 games.
I personally don't think either of them should be playing in the NHL next year but opinions vary. Carlsson worked his way into the conversation over the past week or so but Fantilli is still the betting favorite.
Players are very often making that big step around 22-23 year old seasons. Happens to everybody, they enter some sort of their physical prime.The more I see the more I think the Mackinnon comparison fits. Nate was good when he came into the league but it took him a few years to not just want to go 100 MPH and steamroll people all the time. I think there's going to be a similar adjustment curve with Fantilli. I think he'll put up 40-50 points for a couple years and people are going to question the pick but then he'll explode production wise once he figures out what works.