Mighty Makar
I hate this fu*ken team
- May 24, 2016
- 15,220
- 16,861
I’ll hate this f***en team if Toews leaves.
I hope I’m wrong, but this could very well be Toews’ last year with the Avs.
But they can't go high AAV.To sign him they’ll have to.
Over the last 2 seasons, Girard has been 60th overall in time on ice per game for defensemen.Matches the eye test too. No matter how good Girard looks skating the puck out of the zone he's going to have limitations defending due to his size. Now that he's completely off the PP he's just not worth his contract. You can't be paying a small defenseman that's not even on the PP that kind of money.
Because advanced stats tends to not favor stay at home physical defenseman like Manson but benefits defenseman that moves the puck.If you can go 8 with Nuke there’s zero reason to not go 8 years with Toews.
Why should Girard benefit from advanced stats but Manson shouldn’t?
They can, it just isn’t without compromise.But they can't go high AAV.
It's 7-8 years or nothing. If the Avs won't go there like they didn't want to with Kadri then Toews walks.
They don’t benefit those guys because they aren’t good hockey players majority of the time. But there’s plenty of stay at home guys who have fine to even great analyticsBecause advanced stats tends to not favor stay at home physical defenseman like Manson but benefits defenseman that moves the puck.
That’s not true. There are many stay at home guys who are gods analyticallyBecause advanced stats tends to not favor stay at home physical defenseman like Manson but benefits defenseman that moves the puck.
Nuke's 8 years: age 27 to 35
Toews' 8 years: age 30 to 38
No team wants 35+ players making big money
I agree the Avs don't want olds... but be be clear, there are no 35+ cap rules that would apply to any of these contracts.I think it's exactly this. Team gave Miles of Wood six years to drive down AAV, it's not term that's the issue per se, but rather the 35+ status of the contract and the incumbent cap rules.
I agree the Avs don't want olds... but be be clear, there are no 35+ cap rules that would apply to any of these contracts.
Yeah and the even narrowed those 35+ implications in the latest MOU. At this point, teams can avoid the 35+ tag pretty easily.Yes, you are correct. I've had another look and the rule only applies to contracts signed when the player is 35+. I think I was conflating with the cap recapture penalties that we've seen on those long contracts from the previous CBA.
Yes for the love of god grab Allison.Give me Allison please
Unless Cmac is willing to move G then this is entirely possible.I hope I’m wrong, but this could very well be Toews’ last year with the Avs.