f*** off, dude.
Why do you keep coming up with these imaginative excuses? There is not one reason for Frost to now have been benched for five straight games, absolutely zero. Even if you want to believe your made up excuse of Torts/Briere wantingmore information on other players and their roles, there are 11 other forwards on the team, you take one of them out so that you can get Frost back into the line up. It's embarrassing the fact that you can't admit this organization has no idea what they are doing with Frost.I doubt it has anything to do with Frost not kissing Tort's ass.
Frost has said and done the right things.
And if Torts really had it in for Frost, why sign him to a two year bridge? Why wasn't he traded over the summer?
I suspect it's more about Torts/Briere wanting more information on other players and their roles, especially Foerster (keep on team?) and Tippett (can he adjust to LW?).
Fans may feel urgency, but if they feel they're rebuilding, then Briere can afford to be patient and wait a few more games before making some decisions (send Foerster down to LHV, move Tippett to RW and Laughton to LW, keep TK at LW or trade for a LW).
It probably comes down more to Laughton v Frost, which may be driven by Tort's preference for Laughton as an all around player or Briere's desire to showcase Laughton (i.e. if they really wanted to get rid of Frost, they'd play him a lot of minutes in offensive situations to pad his stats).
f*** off, dude.
Why do you keep coming up with these imaginative excuses? There is not one reason for Frost to now have been benched for five straight games, absolutely zero. Even if you want to believe your made up excuse of Torts/Briere wantingmore information on other players and their roles, there are 11 other forwards on the team, you take one of them out so that you can get Frost back into the line up. It's embarrassing the fact that you can't admit this organization has no idea what they are doing with Frost.
But the thing is he hasn't said anything real about Frost. He was asked about him once last week, he hasn't been asked significantly sinceOccam's razor.
If Torts didn't want Frost on the team, he'd have been dealt over the summer, not given a bridge deal.
If Torts was unhappy with Frost, he'd say so. Instead he says he has to get him into the lineup.
memer when we said he was the sameol in a new suit.So Andrae got 3 games ????
And 2 straight losses and still no Frost, and tonight will be 3 straight losses for Emperor Torts and his guys !!
Briere is such a rat, he will go down as one of the WORST Flyers Gms, mark my words.
Occam's razor.
If Torts didn't want Frost on the team, he'd have been dealt over the summer, not given a bridge deal.
If Torts was unhappy with Frost, he'd say so. Instead he says he has to get him into the lineup.
Seeler did not look good on the right side, Belpedio is a RHD.
If they are sending a message to Attard, it suggests he's not working on his defense, which is what is keeping him out of the NHL - he has solid offensive skills, but defensive fundamentals have been the issue from the get go. After TDA, they may be taking that more seriously.
because its a personal fued.Just watched Tort's presser to see if there was anything about Frost. He said
-"So important [to play] for developing players", and
-"We are trying to generate more offensive this year"
Then the question comes about changes to forward lines; Torts replies, 'No changes.' There is no real follow-up questions.
If you're trying to generate more offensive this year, how is it that maybe your best offensive center, your best pure playmaker, the player who led the team in ES scoring last year, who lead the team in preseason this year, is sitting on the bench?
How are these beats not asking for further explanation? Everything Torts is saying would suggest Frost should be playing, but it's now going to be 14 days since the last time this kid has played. He's going to have rust and then Torts will use that to justify another benching.
But the thing is he hasn't said anything real about Frost. He was asked about him once last week, he hasn't been asked significantly since
Some teams have beat writers like "walking a beat."How are these beats not asking for further explanation?
That's simply not true. We saw it last year, it was the same in CBJ, Torts benched almost everyone at some point, some even multiple times, and they got another shot. Look at TDA, for example.because its a personal fued.
if Torts dont like you, thats the end of ur playing time.
Just watched Tort's presser to see if there was anything about Frost. He said
-"So important [to play] for developing players", and
-"We are trying to generate more offensive this year"
Then the question comes about changes to forward lines; Torts replies, 'No changes.' There is no real follow-up questions.
If you're trying to generate more offensive this year, how is it that maybe your best offensive center, your best pure playmaker, the player who led the team in ES scoring last year, who lead the team in preseason this year, is sitting on the bench?
How are these beats not asking for further explanation? Everything Torts is saying would suggest Frost should be playing, but it's now going to be 14 days since the last time this kid has played. He's going to have rust and then Torts will use that to justify another benching.
But the thing is he hasn't said anything real about Frost. He was asked about him once last week, he hasn't been asked significantly since
That's because a lot of people here jump to conclusions without evidence.It's not even slightly mysterious to anyone but you.
How is that any different than you are doing when you say they are just evaluating Foerster?That's because a lot of people here jump to conclusions without evidence.
Because they haven't said Foerster has a starting job.How is that any different than you are doing when you say they are just evaluating Foerster?