I get the frustration because, trust me, it's warranted and I share it. But I think you're kinda misplacing it and shitting on players who don't deserve it.
They don't have "jack shit." They actually have a handful of useful young or young-ish players who would fit right in on a very good, competitive team. The problem is they don't have elite centerpiece talent to make use of it. That's because your options for acquiring that are basically:
1. Bottom out/luck out and draft top-5 (they got the luck once and...Nolan Patrick!)
2. Scout well/luck out and hit on a player outside of the top 5
3. Have the cap flexibilty or assets to sign/trade for it in the rare occasions it becomes available.
None of that has come to fruition, because they refused to bottom out (on purpose, at least) under Hextall and Fletcher, they haven't gotten that lightning strike luck, and for point #3...again, Hextall and Fletcher.
If York develops into a really good 2nd-pairing guy (and his ceiling might be a little higher than that even) then...that's a perfectly good use of a mid-1st round pick. Who gives a shit about nice second pairing defensemen? Uh, every goddamn team in the league. They're a pretty sought-after commodity.
As for Konecny, I didn't really give you an assessment, I stated a fact. Now I'll combine that with a bit of an assessment. This might get chincy for you, but it's a nuanced game, right? Even despite one particularly bad down year, Konecny is 83rd among forwards for even strength points per 60 since he entered the league. For perspective, Giroux is 70th over that time—and
QuantHockey doesn't let me filter minimum games played, so when you scrape out the 10 small-sample size guys with 25 or fewer games played, Giroux is at about 61 and Konecny is around 72.
So, 30-32 teams over that time period means 90-96 first line players means that at even strength, Konecny has produced at first-line levels throughout his entire NHL career.
The raw point totals don't reflect that because:
1. He has averaged less than 14 ES minutes per game over his whole career, which is pretty low for guys who score the way he does (and a huge credit to the awesome geniuses who have coached the Flyers over that span)
2. The vast majority of his PP time was spent on either their godawful second unit early in his career or their godawful first unit since (2019-20 being the outlier).
You can think this is all pick-and-choose wizardry, but the point is this: When we see TK's stats TOTALLY EXPLODE!!! this past season, it's not really an anomaly. His scoring rate improved slightly this past year, but the vast majority of his "nice year" came from TOI. He's always scored at a first-line rate and he finally got first-line minutes, playing over 20 minutes a night. Which is about 3 minutes more per night compared to the year before and 5 minutes more than his career average.
That's it. That's the biggest difference. Travis Konecny is really good at scoring in the NHL. When the minutes go up, so do the point totals. It's a simple formula. Is a first liner a secondary player?
On the "secondary talent" thing, I'll disagree—at least in respect to like, York and Konecny. Those are really good players who would have an important role on any team in the NHL. Third, fourth, fifth-rate talent? Yeah, they love that shit. But that's the Ristos and Deslauriers and worse.
They don't suck because they picked players like York and Konecny. Those are guys that either already have or will soon outperform all established standards for their draft position. They suck because they haven't had cohesive leadership or a plan—or luck—to acquire the elite centerpieces you need to win in this era.