FLYguy3911
Sanheim Lover
- Oct 19, 2006
- 54,767
- 90,166
They are going to be hunting for size so Girard is out.
nah…front hood ornament…a snarling dogI don't know what the front office would accept, but we need draft picks more than anything. We can still afford to take some cap dumps. I would drive Hayes and Laughton there for you, but I would make Hayes ride in the trunk.
You didn't see Lindros and LeClair together did you?
Although, for his play style I think his answer makes sense. LeClair already did what Knuble did....just a whole lot better. A prime Knuble would clean up a lot of Giroux and Voracek passes and wreak havoc in the crease.
When have they hunted for size with Flahr running the draft?
All the big guys they drafted were skilled other than McDonald in the 6th rd.
The bigger problem has been too many big skilled players who were "soft" (Voracek, JVR, Hayes).
My problem with Girard is just how good is he, it's not that he's small, but can he play defense? He's good but not great on offense. Sanheim level.
In his favor, he was 2nd on the AVs in blocked shots.
But he was -10 in the regular season, -4 in the PO, now +/- is a limited stat, but it's hard to be minus on the team like the AVs!
And his xGFrel the last two years reflects this, especially the PO, -9.16, -9.17.
Girard will be 25 on a 4x5 contract. LH shot.
Hard pass. Put him on the Flyers and I'll bet his game falls apart.
They are going to be hunting for size so Girard is out.
grinder/mucker... thats the only thing they care about..No mention of anything about him other than his height and weight. Checks out lol.
Something like 'Flyers add smooth-skating two-way defense prospect with size" would have been a much more educational headline.
Also, isn't "trade deal" a bit redundant?
this is the type of bargain the Avs usually look for. Probably need retention on Hayes if he won't cost much so they can still add to the roster with other assets. I hope I'm wrong but I wouldn't be surprised at all to see it happen, and I think Hayes would be decent for COLLaughton’s nickname is “Sarge”??
Also, I’d take anything for Hayes. More than a cap dump and a 7th is too generous
You think if they traded for Girard, they wouldn't put, "we just obtained 5'9 170 lb D-man Girard . . . " It's a simple description. People here are weird.Too funny reading this.
Not going after Girard....they want size
When have they drafted for size under Flahr
Pic of Grans trade with Flyers hilighting his height and weight
The alternative was?
it's like someone pissing on your face and you try and say it's just raining.
Unfortunately, I have a weak wrist shot.Torts is going to use you in OT you defend so much
You think if they traded for Girard, they wouldn't put, "we just obtained 5'9 170 lb D-man Girard . . . " It's a simple description. People here are weird.
All the big players Flahr drafted were skill players, Foerster, Gauthier, Attard, Kaplan, other than 6th rd pick McDonald.
I think we can all agree that big skill players, skill held equal, are a better bet than small skill players.
Tippett can skate and shoot, would he be a better player if he was 5'9 180 and was the same skater and shooter?
Now if you want to claim that Holmgren and Hextall were obsessed with size, well, Morin, Bunnaman, Ratcliffe, Ginning, St Ivany et al would agree with you.
Some posters here are obsessed with the past. "Six years ago they drafted . . ."
But those days are long gone.
Briere is the GM, last time I checked he was listed at 5'9 174, think he's obsessed with size?
Torts' favorite players over the years included St. Louis and Atkinson, and one of his favorite Flyers is TK and he put York on the 1st pair. Think he's obsessed with size?
Alright, I'm jealous of this one.Torts is going to use you in OT you defend so much
Probably not. But we have plenty of evidence that you are.You think if they traded for Girard, they wouldn't put, "we just obtained 5'9 170 lb D-man Girard . . . " It's a simple description. People here are weird.
All the big players Flahr drafted were skill players, Foerster, Gauthier, Attard, Kaplan, other than 6th rd pick McDonald.
I think we can all agree that big skill players, skill held equal, are a better bet than small skill players.
Tippett can skate and shoot, would he be a better player if he was 5'9 180 and was the same skater and shooter?
Now if you want to claim that Holmgren and Hextall were obsessed with size, well, Morin, Bunnaman, Ratcliffe, Ginning, St Ivany et al would agree with you.
Some posters here are obsessed with the past. "Six years ago they drafted . . ."
But those days are long gone.
Briere is the GM, last time I checked he was listed at 5'9 174, think he's obsessed with size?
Torts' favorite players over the years included St. Louis and Atkinson, and one of his favorite Flyers is TK and he put York on the 1st pair. Think he's obsessed with size?
Or keep his mouth shut, and in three weeks, take a "vacation" in Tblisi, then a connecting flight to London . . .
now that Flutch is gone i sure bloody hope soKings fan here - would the Flyers move Seeler?
Kings fan here - would the Flyers move Seeler?