Boston Bruins 2023-24 Roster and Salary Cap Discussion V

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
To break out of the physicality talk cycle - if Edmonton continues their fall and picks in the top 10, in the offseason:

Would you trade Ullmark for that pick, assuming he'll waive his NTC?

Would Edmonton be desperate enough to trade that pick for Ullmark or would there need to be an add?

Did a quick look at their cap situation for next year.

They have about 10 million to spend but need 5 forwards and 1 D and 1 G to get to 20.

Not impossible, but they’d have to move out a couple of players making real money.
 
Did a quick look at their cap situation for next year.

They have about 10 million to spend but need 5 forwards and 1 D and 1 G to get to 20.

Not impossible, but they’d have to move out a couple of players making real money.
They probably need to move Campbell, although not too many teams are taking that contract.
 
Did a quick look at their cap situation for next year.

They have about 10 million to spend but need 5 forwards and 1 D and 1 G to get to 20.

Not impossible, but they’d have to move out a couple of players making real money.
According to my calculations they have over 20 million in cap space next season. Could be a lot more depending on the cap.

But they do need a ton of players signed. I agree with that much.

3 defenders, 1 goalie and like 4-5 forwards.

9 players essentially sharing the remaining 20+ million. I think the cap is jumping though.
 
According to my calculations they have over 20 million in cap space next season. Could be a lot more depending on the cap.

But they do need a ton of players signed. I agree with that much.

3 defenders, 1 goalie and like 4-5 forwards.

9 players essentially sharing the remaining 20+ million. I think the cap is jumping though.
I was going by cap friendly
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5821.png
    IMG_5821.png
    195.7 KB · Views: 4
To break out of the physicality talk cycle - if Edmonton continues their fall and picks in the top 10, in the offseason:

Would you trade Ullmark for that pick, assuming he'll waive his NTC?

Would Edmonton be desperate enough to trade that pick for Ullmark or would there need to be an add?


Think we've got a wildly different definition of intimidation.
I am sure we do have a different definition of intimidated but to get to the question you asked I would be very wary of moving either goalie right now unless a young top 2 center was the return.

Also I don't know much about this years draft, say Edmonton comes in between 8-12, is there an impact prospect there or is this a weak draft?

Also can't see Ullmark waiving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NeelyDan
To break out of the physicality talk cycle - if Edmonton continues their fall and picks in the top 10, in the offseason:

Would you trade Ullmark for that pick, assuming he'll waive his NTC?

Would Edmonton be desperate enough to trade that pick for Ullmark or would there need to be an add?


Think we've got a wildly different definition of intimidation.

I would
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDiesel
I am sure we do have a different definition of intimidated but to get to the question you asked I would be very wary of moving either goalie right now unless a young top 2 center was the return.

Also I don't know much about this years draft, say Edmonton comes in between 8-12, is there an impact prospect there or is this a weak draft?

Also can't see Ullmark waiving.
I think the main sticking point would be Ullmark waiving, but hypothetically speaking they could get that lottery pick from the Oil and now have a pretty valuable asset that they can use to obtain a top 6C.

Is for this draft I honestly have no clue about the players, I think you would make that trade with full intention on flipping the pick.
 
The only reason I would move on from either of our goalies is a cap situation or someone totally blew us away with an offer we couldn’t refuse. I have tons of faith in both of our goalies. I’d like to keep them both for the next decade or so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alan Ryan
Much better suggestion than McEwan, I personally see Shattenkirks spot as one to look to add some size, although RD are already hard to come by.
Except Trenin makes $1.7m. They can’t afford him without moving a fairly important/expensive piece. I think they need to look at guys making less than $1m.

Not sure they can replace Shattenkirk with a hammer either. Someone in that third pair has to pass the puck out of the Dzone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDiesel
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad