Speculation: 2023-24-25 Sharks Roster Discussion

DG93

Registered User
Jun 29, 2010
4,517
2,549
San Jose
Not all teams can easily fit Laine's 8.7M x2 years under the cap either...I think that will limit suitors unless Columbus is ready to take on some bad cap coming back. The Sharks could certainly accommodate though, so I'd offer pick #42 + Bordeleau.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OversKy

spintops

Registered User
Sep 13, 2013
1,667
904
I'm confused, I thought many of you wanted us to be bad again next year. What would brinigng in Laine accomplish?
We would be just as bad, he might pump up the scoring numbers for our rookies though. I also don't think anyone is saying go out and tank again? I don't want to spend future assets yet unless we are getting really young players. But I'm down for improving the roster through FA or trading spare parts for guys that help. I thought most people wanted to take a step forward while realizing we will for sure pick in the top 5 again.
 

Star Platinum

Registered User
May 11, 2024
138
224
I'm confused, I thought many of you wanted us to be bad again next year. What would bringing in Laine accomplish?
Having Laine on your roster doesn't seem to be much of a roadblock to being bad. But it would give the young guys a genuine NHL wing to play with and maybe they rehabilitate a bit of his value and flip him in 2026 for something to a contending team. Depends on the price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sharks_dynasty

Star Platinum

Registered User
May 11, 2024
138
224
Offering anything more than cap dumps and nothing prospects for Laine is a bad idea.
With mental health and physical injury issues combined with a high price tag, I don't think anyone believes it will take a lot to acquire him. Bigger issue is whether he's willing to go to another bad franchise, as the Sharks are probably one of the franchises in his no-trade clause.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
70,793
14,317
Folsom
With mental health and physical injury issues combined with a high price tag, I don't think anyone believes it will take a lot to acquire him. Bigger issue is whether he's willing to go to another bad franchise, as the Sharks are probably one of the franchises in his no-trade clause.
True but if he would be willing to come here for his fresh start, we should only be offering guys like Vlasic, Kunin, Zadina, Burroughs, Benning or other pro players with no trade value with prospects with no trade value like Kaut or Thompson or guys like that. No picks or anything legitimately valuable like Ferraro or Blackwood.
 

ChompChomp

Can't wait for Sharks hockey to return someday
Jan 8, 2007
11,162
1,847
El Paso, TX
With mental health and physical injury issues combined with a high price tag, I don't think anyone believes it will take a lot to acquire him. Bigger issue is whether he's willing to go to another bad franchise, as the Sharks are probably one of the franchises in his no-trade clause.

He might allow a trade to play with Celebrini and Smith.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StanleyCup2035

tiburon12

Registered User
Jul 18, 2009
4,770
4,687
We just got rid of useless wingers Labanc and Hoffman why would we want to add another of the same caliber/tyle?
I think Laine's issues are more mental than physical, and because of that I think that in the right setting he can be a top player again. I wasn't joking when I said warm weather and sunshine would be great for him; my physical and mental health improved exponentially when I moved to a place where i got tons of vitamin D all year round .

So imagine getting an emotionally positive, motivated Laine who is eager to build with this org, all for some spare parts. That's the upside I see.
 

Cas

Conversational Black Hole
Sponsor
Jun 23, 2020
5,552
7,931
We just got rid of useless wingers Labanc and Hoffman why would we want to add another of the same caliber/tyle?
Laine has not been anywhere near the same caliber. Similar type of player, sure, but significantly better than either has been over the last few years (and better than Labanc has ever been).

If he's cheap, sure - we get a legitimate NHL sniper as a distressed asset we can hopefully turn into something nice in eighteen months, or he flunks and we simply got a cap dump for some spare parts while we were already going to suck.
 

weastern bias

worst team in the league
Feb 3, 2012
10,630
6,061
SJ
I wouldn’t take Laine for free.
Unironically this, I hate Patrick Laine as a hockey player, he has no NHL caliber skills outside of an elite shot, he's Brandon Pirri with draft pedigree
I'm confused, I thought many of you wanted us to be bad again next year. What would brinigng in Laine accomplish?
Laine wouldn't make our team any better, he's awful, I'd only take him on as a cap dump along with a sweetener, like Laine + 2nd for a 7th type of deal
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

LadyStanley

Registered User
Sep 22, 2004
107,602
20,398
Sin City
We just got rid of useless wingers Labanc and Hoffman why would we want to add another of the same caliber/tyle?
Still under contract until 6/30. Sharks have announced they won't re-sign.

Sharks have 49 active contracts until then so if they acquire folks at draft under contract, they may have to trade out an equal or greater # of contracts.
 

mogambomoroo

Registered User
Oct 12, 2020
1,390
2,336
I've dreamed about Laine in teal since the day he debuted in Winnipeg.
I understand it doesn't look too great now, but like I said last year about Granlund, I think Laine with a clean slate could go back to his potential.
With Celebrini, Smith, Eklund, Granlund, Zetterlund he could fit perfectly on that 1st-2nd line.
I wouldn't be opposed to having Laine - Celebrini - Smith line. Laine is probably not the best teacher in 200 ft game for Celebrini/Smith but he'll give them all the points if he is on his game.
 

weastern bias

worst team in the league
Feb 3, 2012
10,630
6,061
SJ
Would it be fair to describe Laine as a middle six winger/ elite powerplay specialist?
He's a one timer specialist who is slow, doesn't use his size, has no defensive acumen, has below average puck handling skills, isn’t a playmaker, and hasn't scored 30 goals in 5 years

I would describe him as a bad hockey player who will continue to be fed ice time because he was a #2 pick and he has an elite shot, but I wouldn't want him on my team at all
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad