Key quote (last sentence):
The Sharks are more likely to be a doormat enjoyed by opposing fanbases all season than a group of legendary losers remembered for years to come.
tl;dr our expected goals are higher than we've seen, our goaltending is slightly better than league average, and if you project out those things for the rest of the season, author argues we're likely to be worst but not historically bad. Time will tell!
A regression towards our xG per game over our actual goals per game would still have us as a historically bad team
As that article points out our xG for is currently at 2.09 per game, that would only be good enough for the 66th worst of all time rather than the 2nd, still historic for a league that is over 100 years old
The idea that our offense can regress to the mean and restore us to respectability ignores that our goaltending is massively outperforming their xGA, which is just as likely to regress
Our team goaltending has saved 2.52 goals above expected at even strength in 9 games, or an extra goal against every 5 games, it doesn't make any more sense to expect our goaltending to keep playing so well behind this defense than it does for us to expect our offense to start capitalizing in opportunities when we don't have any elite play drivers on the roster
We're dead last in shots on goal per game with 24.6, .1 behind STL, and we're dead last in shots on goal allowed per game with 38.3, 1.8 shots more than MTL, our xG opportunities don't translate to shots on goal but our shots against also aren't translating to an expected amount of goals against, if our metrics regress to the mean we'd roughly meet in the middle right where we are now as one of the worst teams of all time