Prospect Info: [2023 - 110th] Bogdan Konyushkov (KHL - Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod)

schwang26

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
4,659
4,473
He was very good, just the prevailing thought was his production would translate from the Swedish second league to the top as most players did. Then he didn't. Then he had a great playoffs. Then he struggled a lot the next season across three leagues including the NHL. Then last year he seemed to progress a lot at the end of the season after being dicked with the whole year in terms of icectime, leaving some speculation he could still develop. He's been very up and down since being drafted.

This season will be pretty crucial for him but Laval's coaches don't seem to like or trust him so he's working from behind compared to Trudeau or Beaudin who will eat top 4 minutes. Struble is also coming in to take minutes. Mailloux will probably steal that top pairing PP time Norlinder should have been getting the past two years but didn't. Then Wideman is probably going to go down as well. Norlinder is not in good position as we are super deep on D.
I never was that impressed by him. He had the occasional good play and he can move the puck, but I found him lacking, especially for an offensive D. I'd have to check, but I don't think he even really produced much in Sweden. I never saw the hype.

Just checked and ya, his production wasn't great in Sweden. In fact, it dropped after his first year. And yes, I'm well aware it's not the same production over there as in NA, but apples to apples, they weren't great.
 

dackelljuneaubulis02

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
11,958
7,600
He was very good, just the prevailing thought was his production would translate from the Swedish second league to the top as most players did. Then he didn't. Then he had a great playoffs. Then he struggled a lot the next season across three leagues including the NHL. Then last year he seemed to progress a lot at the end of the season after being dicked with the whole year in terms of icectime, leaving some speculation he could still develop. He's been very up and down since being drafted.

This season will be pretty crucial for him but Laval's coaches don't seem to like or trust him so he's working from behind compared to Trudeau or Beaudin who will eat top 4 minutes. Struble is also coming in to take minutes. Mailloux will probably steal that top pairing PP time Norlinder should have been getting the past two years but didn't. Then Wideman is probably going to go down as well. Norlinder is not in good position as we are super deep on D.
Yeah it’s amazing how many seem to forget he showed plus, skating, plus hands and plus shot a few years back. Don’t know if the injuries played a part but like you said very up and down. It’s not looking good but he seemed to improve in the 2nd half. Would be hilarious if he became relevant again and we’re even more stacked back there
 

dackelljuneaubulis02

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
11,958
7,600
I never was that impressed by him. He had the occasional good play and he can move the puck, but I found him lacking, especially for an offensive D. I'd have to check, but I don't think he even really produced much in Sweden. I never saw the hype.

Just checked and ya, his production wasn't great in Sweden. In fact, it dropped after his first year. And yes, I'm well aware it's not the same production over there as in NA, but apples to apples, they weren't great.
Nah the production was there. D+1 was great. SHL playoff totals were very solid. Injuries were a thing. He slowly stagnated and regressed though. The talent is/was there. Lot of revisionism going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Lurk

Wats

Error 520
Mar 8, 2006
42,240
6,996
... and then, at that point, you are supposed to tell what you heard , so people could be happy instead of frustrated , eating all the ice cream to compensate :banghead:


then don't stop to type
Well the only other way to scout him then would be in person. Kinda goes without saying.
 

schwang26

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
4,659
4,473
Nah the production was there. D+1 was great. SHL playoff totals were very solid. Injuries were a thing. He slowly stagnated and regressed though. The talent is/was there. Lot of revisionism going on.
He had a decent playoffs, but regular season he went from 10 points to 2 points the next year. How's that solid?
 

dackelljuneaubulis02

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
11,958
7,600


Oh how quickly we forget

He had a decent playoffs, but regular season he went from 10 points to 2 points the next year. How's that solid?
Well if you were talking specifically about his D+3 then absolutely. I thought you meant his tenure there as a whole.

Injuries were a thing. He did regress though but some are acting like there was never anything there
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Lurk

schwang26

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
4,659
4,473


Oh how quickly we forget


Well if you were talking specifically about his D+3 then absolutely. I thought you meant his tenure there as a whole.

Injuries were a thing. He did regress though but some are acting like there was never anything there

Ya but the year he had 18 points was a junior league. That wasn't SHL. Anyway, sure he had flashes, but compared to what we have now, he's been passed over big time. Trudeau is even way ahead of him. Don't get me wrong, I hope every prospect succeeds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Lurk

dackelljuneaubulis02

Registered User
Oct 13, 2012
11,958
7,600
Ya but the year he had 18 points was a junior league. That wasn't SHL. Anyway, sure he had flashes, but compared to what we have now, he's been passed over big time. Trudeau is even way ahead of him. Don't get me wrong, I hope every prospect succeeds.
It was the alsvenakan league. 2nd tier pro league. Not quite SHL but a big step up from Sweden junior. Some of those alsvenskan teams make their way up to the SHL if I’m not mistaken.

Oh I’m definitely not betting on him. I’m just rebutting the posters that are saying he wasn’t much of anything. I’ll fully concede I overrated him at the time but he really went sideways in his development. He was plenty talented.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings

Wateredgarden

Registered User
Oct 10, 2020
974
1,328
i remember when our only hope would be guys like Farrell and Norlinder during the Timmins 10 years dry spell. I'm just happy we have actual hope now.
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
50,411
73,342
Texas
i remember when our only hope would be guys like Farrell and Norlinder during the Timmins 10 years dry spell. I'm just happy we have actual hope now.
We still lack top end talent at the forward group. Embarrassing to think that Mesar is our only 1st rounder amongst non NHL prospects
 

Ezpz

No mad pls
Apr 16, 2013
15,346
11,870
i remember when our only hope would be guys like Farrell and Norlinder during the Timmins 10 years dry spell. I'm just happy we have actual hope now.
I think the fact that Farrell has progressed extremely well and still is barely a top ten prospect for us is a good sign. Timmins, for all his faults, started hitting or attempting to hit homeruns again after Bergevin stopped trading picks. I think they kept trying to draft "safe" when they'd only have six picks in a draft and no second rounder.

Guhle, Trudeau, Dobes, Farrell, Mailloux, Kidney, Roy, Caufield, Struble, RHP, Harris, Ylonen, Norlinder, Romanov, are all interesting prospects or NHLers that Timmins got in his last four years (didn't include KK cause that's just straight up a bad pick at #3 overall, his progression would be good as a mid-late first) There's a lot of busts too but it shows when you hoard picks you're able to make those longshot attempts more often. Not to mention he's the one who invited and asked Bergevin to sign Xhekaj.

Just take the 2019 draft for example, RHP was one of those extra picks. If we'd had less picks, the team probably would have went with only Arsen Khisamutdinov who is basically a plug at 25.

It has been quite the turnaround, there were many years where Gallagher and Price with 1-3 others were the only drafted guys on the team. This year we're going in with at least 8-9 + Xhekaj. Nick Suzuki was basically developed by us as well, as he never played for Vegas and only attended one camp with them.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
58,991
44,809
www.youtube.com
I think the fact that Farrell has progressed extremely well and still is barely a top ten prospect for us is a good sign. Timmins, for all his faults, started hitting or attempting to hit homeruns again after Bergevin stopped trading picks. I think they kept trying to draft "safe" when they'd only have six picks in a draft and no second rounder.

Guhle, Trudeau, Dobes, Farrell, Mailloux, Kidney, Roy, Caufield, Struble, RHP, Harris, Ylonen, Norlinder, Romanov, are all interesting prospects or NHLers that Timmins got in his last four years (didn't include KK cause that's just straight up a bad pick at #3 overall, his progression would be good as a mid-late first) There's a lot of busts too but it shows when you hoard picks you're able to make those longshot attempts more often. Not to mention he's the one who invited and asked Bergevin to sign Xhekaj.

Just take the 2019 draft for example, RHP was one of those extra picks. If we'd had less picks, the team probably would have went with only Arsen Khisamutdinov who is basically a plug at 25.

It has been quite the turnaround, there were many years where Gallagher and Price with 1-3 others were the only drafted guys on the team. This year we're going in with at least 8-9 + Xhekaj. Nick Suzuki was basically developed by us as well, as he never played for Vegas and only attended one camp with them.

well said! Can't expect much from a draft when you have 1 top 100 pick or 1 top 60 pick several years running. That said had they drafted better and made better decisions in several areas things of course would look much different likely much better. But that's what happens when you just make way too many mistakes as an organization. People get fired and new guys come in to try and fix the mess.

Now we wait and see if they repeat the same mistakes or not. I can't say I feel great about some of the drafting/development so far but we'll see, should be a fun year to follow the story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezpz and bopeep

Ezpz

No mad pls
Apr 16, 2013
15,346
11,870
well said! Can't expect much from a draft when you have 1 top 100 pick or 1 top 60 pick several years running. That said had they drafted better and made better decisions in several areas things of course would look much different likely much better. But that's what happens when you just make way too many mistakes as an organization. People get fired and new guys come in to try and fix the mess.

Now we wait and see if they repeat the same mistakes or not. I can't say I feel great about some of the drafting/development so far but we'll see, should be a fun year to follow the story.
I would also add that a big issue in the Bergevin era is they didn't invest as much in development even after drafting. It is an interesting debate whether we started drafting better in 2018 or if it's because a lot of the guys drafted then came in under Hughes, Marty, and the development staff and were given chances to grow. Probably a little bit of both. So was Timmins unfairly vilified for Bergevin's poor leadership? Another debate. Timmins can be blamed too since he was promoted to assistant GM, which honestly probably wasn't smart. He really seems to only be good at scouting, particularly Dmen.

I'm just glad we're in the Hughes era where he seems to understand that you need smart people heading every aspect of drafting, development, coaching, etc. My only complaint would be finding someone who is better than Houle at the AHL level, but the truth is great coaches don't look for stable AHL development-focused gigs. Houle will never in a thousand years be an NHL coach, so it could be that the group thinks they can mold him into a good long-term AHL development coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: montreal

Wateredgarden

Registered User
Oct 10, 2020
974
1,328
I think the fact that Farrell has progressed extremely well and still is barely a top ten prospect for us is a good sign. Timmins, for all his faults, started hitting or attempting to hit homeruns again after Bergevin stopped trading picks. I think they kept trying to draft "safe" when they'd only have six picks in a draft and no second rounder.

Guhle, Trudeau, Dobes, Farrell, Mailloux, Kidney, Roy, Caufield, Struble, RHP, Harris, Ylonen, Norlinder, Romanov, are all interesting prospects or NHLers that Timmins got in his last four years (didn't include KK cause that's just straight up a bad pick at #3 overall, his progression would be good as a mid-late first) There's a lot of busts too but it shows when you hoard picks you're able to make those longshot attempts more often. Not to mention he's the one who invited and asked Bergevin to sign Xhekaj.

Just take the 2019 draft for example, RHP was one of those extra picks. If we'd had less picks, the team probably would have went with only Arsen Khisamutdinov who is basically a plug at 25.

It has been quite the turnaround, there were many years where Gallagher and Price with 1-3 others were the only drafted guys on the team. This year we're going in with at least 8-9 + Xhekaj. Nick Suzuki was basically developed by us as well, as he never played for Vegas and only attended one camp with them.
Yes i was talking from 2008 to 2017, that's 10 drafts that were almsot all wasted.
 

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,467
25,847
We still lack top end talent at the forward group. Embarrassing to think that Mesar is our only 1st rounder amongst non NHL prospects
Timmins wasn't good at drafting forwards.

But since 2018 (the last year a player could potentially still be a non NHL prospect), we've drafted forwards Kotkaniemi, Caufield, Slafkovsky, Mesar, and dmen Guhle, Mailloux, and Reinbacher. We don't have any non-NHL forward prospects aside from Mesar, because all the others are in the NHL. And Guhle, Mailloux, and Reinbacher so far seem like good picks. But it's early. We also just used a 1st on Alex Newhook.

I'm warming up to Reinbacher, but still unsure about passing on Michkov. But I don't know these 18 year olds well enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyson

KevSkillz4

Registered User
Apr 11, 2016
8,159
13,736
Immediately Konyushkov has become the Engstrom of last year lol
This new management know how to draft D looks like, shit

What's cool for Engstrom is he is still 1 year younger than Konyushkov tho lol

But pretty amazing having these 2 extra pieces of D depth on top of everything else

Yeah sound like this 100%. KHL is difficult to product for young like Konyushkov, already 5 points in 8 games, that's impressive. Another great pick in late round by Habs!
 

1909

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
21,335
11,849
We still lack top end talent at the forward group. Embarrassing to think that Mesar is our only 1st rounder amongst non NHL prospects
You can't have top-end talent every year .
 

Ad

Ad

Ad