Toggle sidebar

Prospect Info: [2022 - 62nd] Lane Hutson (NCAA - Boston University)

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
montreal said:
I don't put any stock in JFresh or advanced stats for that matter, but I've slowly been coming around to them in baseball so I guess it's only a matter of time for me to start paying attention to them in hockey, just not there yet.
Click to expand...
I sorta wish it never became a thing honestly :confused: Moneyball kinda ruin the game in a lot of ways. On an aesthetic level at least I much prefer baseball the way it used to be before guys figured walks and homeruns was all they really needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cournoyer12, montreal and Grate n Colorful Oz
Pompeius Magnus said:
I sorta wish it never became a thing honestly :confused: Moneyball kinda ruin the game in a lot of ways. On an aesthetic level at least I much prefer baseball the way it used to be before guys figured walks and homeruns was all they really needed.
Click to expand...

you and me both, I'm old school when it comes to baseball stats, really hate how it's all about walks, launch angles, etc..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cournoyer12, habsfan891, Sterling Archer and 1 other person
montreal said:
He just creates so much out there, he's on another level then I'm used to seeing as a 18 year old Freshman though as a opposite to what Jordan Harris did in his Freshman year where his defense was excellent but his offense was shit as his shot was weak.

I can't recall any game of Hutson's this season (I think I've missed 1 or 2) where I didn't walk away thinking how did he not have 2 or 3 more points. It just totally reminds me of Caufield but actually a bit more exciting in terms of what i'm seeing. Sure it could end up not going well in the NHL but no way am I betting against this kid, he just gets it imo just based off what he does on the ice. To try those things at that size knowing he's not that fast, strong or quick yet he will deke, shake, shimmy, whatever he has to do and it so often turns into something.




I don't put any stock in JFresh or advanced stats for that matter, but I've slowly been coming around to them in baseball so I guess it's only a matter of time for me to start paying attention to them in hockey, just not there yet.

Hutson's biggest problem is that for his size, he's not overly fast, so you have to mix a lack of height, weight, strength, speed, skating. His defense seems fine to me, it's the lack of the physical tools that can get him into trouble. If say over the next 5 years or even 7 years (so by the time he's 23 or 25) if he can get stronger, improve his upper and lower body strength, add as much mass as possible without it slowing him down, work on the skating and stop using his hands like that as it looks like it just wastes energy and over an 82 game schedule it will help I got to think. If he can work on those things then even at his current height I think he will be a very good NHLer though he may need someone like Guhle as his partner.
Click to expand...
Not implying that the two players are exactly comparable, but back in the day, a lack of size, strength and speed was the take on Gretzky as well. But both of them have a hyperdeveloped hockey mind ("hockey sense"). The motor cortex and the part that connects it to the visual cortices (V1-V5) is cabled with high-throughput white matter tracts, which is what he has over other players. Difficult to measure that advantage with a scale or chronometer. Maybe with a tractographic reconstruction from magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (MR-DTI), assuming an NHL average tractography were possible :skeptic:.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Walrus26, montreal, Twisted Sinister and 1 other person
VirginiaMtlExpat said:
Not implying that the two players are exactly comparable, but back in the day, a lack of size, strength and speed was the take on Gretzky as well. But both of them have a hyperdeveloped hockey mind ("hockey sense"). The motor cortex and the part that connects it to the visual cortices (V1-V5) is cabled with high-throughput white matter tracts, which is what he has over other players. Difficult to measure that advantage with a scale or chronometer. Maybe with a tractographic reconstruction from magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (MR-DTI), assuming an NHL average tractography were possible :skeptic:.
Click to expand...
All I heard was 'HUTSON IS THE NEXT GRETZKY!'
:5:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: HabsfaninBrant, JustAHabFan, junyab and 3 others
VirginiaMtlExpat said:
Not implying that the two players are exactly comparable, but back in the day, a lack of size, strength and speed was the take on Gretzky as well. But both of them have a hyperdeveloped hockey mind ("hockey sense"). The motor cortex and the part that connects it to the visual cortices (V1-V5) is cabled with high-throughput white matter tracts, which is what he has over other players. Difficult to measure that advantage with a scale or chronometer. Maybe with a tractographic reconstruction from magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (MR-DTI), assuming an NHL average tractography were possible :skeptic:.
Click to expand...

That's somewhat of a reduction, no? Spatial recognition of objects needs to pass through the temporal lobe and hippocampus and also involves the entire salience network, which all involve VENs. There's an overlap between default mode and active attention to consider, cause I'm pretty sure they are not entirely on autonomic response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nicehiss and Twisted Sinister
Ozymandias said:
That's somewhat of a reduction, no? Spatial recognition of objects needs to pass through the temporal lobe and hippocampus and also involves the entire salience network, which all involve VENs. There's an overlap between default mode and active attention to consider, cause I'm pretty sure they are not entirely on autonomic response.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: HankyZetts and Goalfield13
He still needs to make the final cut of 25 to the active 23.

He should make it and play 2nd pairing minutes I would think
 
Lane playing on the 2nd pair tonight with Chesley against Finland, 6PM.

F273EF52-FC57-40F4-9494-60C1A5DD5476.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sagikev
SuzukiSZN said:
Lane playing on the 2nd pair tonight with Chesley against Finland, 6PM.

View attachment 623951
Click to expand...

I want to see what he does on the US PP!

Legend123 said:
He still needs to make the final cut of 25 to the active 23.

He should make it and play 2nd pairing minutes I would think
Click to expand...

Who are the offensive D men on the Americans aside from Hutson? Do they have several who can QB a PP? I'm curious. Remember when Robertson was playing 1st line and #1 PP unit and Caufield was playing 2nd line and 2nd PP Unit?
 
Habs Halifax said:
I want to see what he does on the US PP!



Who are the offensive D men on the Americans aside from Hutson? Do they have several who can QB a PP? I'm curious. Remember when Robertson was playing 1st line and #1 PP unit and Caufield was playing 2nd line and 2nd PP Unit?
Click to expand...
Luke Hughes is gonna be on PP1 and Hutson should have PP2, Ufko is a good PP QB too, we’ll see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs Halifax
Ozymandias said:
That's somewhat of a reduction, no? Spatial recognition of objects needs to pass through the temporal lobe and hippocampus and also involves the entire salience network, which all involve VENs. There's an overlap between default mode and active attention to consider, cause I'm pretty sure they are not entirely on autonomic response.
Click to expand...
What’s VENs?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom