jMoneyBrah
Registered User
A team can offer sheet an RFA up to $4.2M AAV before having to transfer a 1st round pick as compensation. Here is the 2023 offer sheet compensation schedule.
Speculation: 2022-23 Sharks Roster Discussion Part II
- Thread starter WTFetus
- Start date
- Status
A team can offer sheet an RFA up to $4.2M AAV before having to transfer a 1st round pick as compensation. Here is the 2023 offer sheet compensation schedule.
Grinner
Registered User
- May 31, 2022
- 1,889
- 1,479
sharski
Registered User
- Jun 4, 2012
- 5,837
- 5,078
The Storm trooper Helmet is done well BUT I think the Smiling Marleau is just So Great!
- Oct 12, 2020
- 1,810
- 3,143
That's the real question, I think Grier has good ties with Rangers and will ask if a trade is possible. Maybe flip some of our not so highly touted prospects and low picks for him.
STL Shark
Registered User
- Mar 6, 2013
- 4,407
- 5,475
Bigger question is does Grier think Laf is any good after being around him for a few years.
Everything over 1.5 would be an extreme over payment, and there is no way that the rangers do not match anything realistic.
Everything over 1.5 would be an extreme over payment, and there is no way that the rangers do not match anything realistic.
Gecklund
Registered User
I mean even a 2nd for him is kind of a lot. Yes he’s only 21 but 91 points in 216 games isn’t something you pay a 2nd for. If I’m SJ and I want Laf, I’m looking at trying to get him+Goodrow for a cheaper player.
Alaskanice
Registered User
jMoneyBrah
Registered User
Yeah, I wasn’t taking a stance either way - just stating facts, breh
But if you want my opinion:While I like the concept of the Laf+Goodrow, and I like Goodrow in a bottom 6 role - that contract is just too much (glad he got paid) it’s a real noose, to the point it might actually interfere with other more productive uses of the cap space.
Counter argument to your idea: what is the likelihood the Sharks would draft a player as that contributes to the level of Laf at the NHL level using a 2nd? I’m under the general impression that a bonafide 3rd line winger (where I think he is today), probable middle 6 upside, with decent top 6 potential, and the outside chance he figures it all out and peaks as a top line winger, would be an excellent outcome for a 2nd round pick.
- Jun 23, 2020
- 5,957
- 8,612
I don't think the Goodrow contract would actually block anything - we're going to suck for a while anyway.Yeah, I wasn’t taking a stance either way - just stating facts, breh
While I like the concept of the Laf+Goodrow, and I like Goodrow in a bottom 6 role - that contract is just too much (glad he got paid) it’s a real noose, to the point it might actually interfere with other more productive uses of the cap space.
Counter argument to your idea: what is the likelihood the Sharks would draft a player as that contributes to the level of Laf at the NHL level using a 2nd? I’m under the general impression that a bonafide 3rd line winger (where I think he is today), probable middle 6 upside, with decent top 6 potential, and the outside chance he figures it all out and peaks as a top line winger, would be an excellent outcome for a 2nd round pick.
My main issue may be that Lafreniere would be close to free agency when we actually start to compete.
I do think he's worth a second, in the abstract anyway. Let's be honest - if Robins were to turn into Lafreniere this season, how many people would be very happy with that outcome? That's basically what we're talking about.
Gecklund
Registered User
You’re right that I don’t think a 2nd will be better. I just would rather picks personally.Yeah, I wasn’t taking a stance either way - just stating facts, breh
While I like the concept of the Laf+Goodrow, and I like Goodrow in a bottom 6 role - that contract is just too much (glad he got paid) it’s a real noose, to the point it might actually interfere with other more productive uses of the cap space.
Counter argument to your idea: what is the likelihood the Sharks would draft a player as that contributes to the level of Laf at the NHL level using a 2nd? I’m under the general impression that a bonafide 3rd line winger (where I think he is today), probable middle 6 upside, with decent top 6 potential, and the outside chance he figures it all out and peaks as a top line winger, would be an excellent outcome for a 2nd round pick.
Goodrow is the exact kind of player I want my young guys to be around. I think by the time the cap space matters, the cap should go up.
Alaskanice
Registered User
Alaskanice
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2020
- 5,957
- 8,612
I'd be ok with throwing a lower level pick for him if management likes him - he's probably worth a 4th or lower if they don't have serious concerns, and we should be able to add some late round picks this year anyway. Yes, we could wait, but someone else could grab him, and burning a 4th or whatever for the guarantee is fine.
I do not know whether Farinacci is worth signing, though - just that, if he is (and is willing to sign), I think a pick is worth the certainty.
Alaskanice
Registered User
OffSydes
#tank2014/5
- Aug 14, 2011
- 3,402
- 2,108
I think my kid solved the Shorks problems and appreciate any help in getting in touch with MG.
They teach someone to be "gooder" than Bedard and trade said player for Bedard. Once traded they stop pretending and the Shorks win the cup with Bedard.
They teach someone to be "gooder" than Bedard and trade said player for Bedard. Once traded they stop pretending and the Shorks win the cup with Bedard.
Jargon
Registered User
Friedman said to “watch the Penguins” this weekend. That he’s been hearing murmurs again with the buyout window — not that it’s a for sure thing but, as we all figured, the likeliest time a trade might happen.
jMoneyBrah
Registered User
FML. I don’t know how my brain farted so hard, but for whatever reason when I looked at Goodrow’s contract on CF I read the 3 at the front of his cap-hit as a 5 (so I was thinking it was $5.6 instead of $3.6, which is so divorced from reality I should have know something was off).
So, with that in mind: yeah, if there was a deal that traded a lower cap player (who on the Sharks roster would this be, Kunin?) for Laf+Goodrow I’d be for it. Also, I agree Goodrow would be a good role model for younger players. Nice creative idea!
Grinner
Registered User
- May 31, 2022
- 1,889
- 1,479
I can't see the Rangers giving up on Laf for that.
Goodson would be welcomed back by the fans whole heartedly
SjMilhouse
Registered User
- Jul 18, 2012
- 2,351
- 3,049
I'll be camping with no service this weekend. Definitely going to happen Saturday/Sunday...I always miss news like this
tiburon12
Registered User
- Jul 18, 2009
- 5,102
- 5,204
That's where Grier's inside knowledge helps. If he knows Laf has the same "stuff" he's looking for in players, then it would be smart to use the 2nd that way. With any uncertainty about him it would probably be less risky (all things considered including contracts) to keep the 2nd
Jargon
Registered User
Honesty I think the return is going to be so disappointing that you’re not really going to miss anything.
- Status
