Toggle sidebar

Speculation: 2022-23 Sharks Roster Discussion Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
sharski

sharski

Registered User
Jun 4, 2012
5,837
5,078
landshark said:
Nice!! I had issues getting the right angle. And sizing was weird for me, I think I haven't figured out how to size the layer individually after I drop it on there. If that's possible. I'm using a free website photoeditor thingy.

Was Patty basically a stormtrooper? I think so. He's shooting away from the goalie for a goal, trying his hardest to not hit the goalie, and hits the goalie dead on in the chest instead of missing... :sarcasm:

It's a good thing for the rebel alliance that the head stormtrooper never figured out reverse psychology.
Click to expand...
I use gimp because I'm on poverty time and mgmt will get suspicious if I try to expense a Photoshop license when I'm not a designer

It's definitely enough for chopping memes while you're on the clock though
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan, Pavelski2112, landshark and 1 other person

gaucholoco3

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
1,506
1,927
I
Pinkfloyd said:
If push comes to shove because Petry is supposedly what stopped an EK65 trade previously, the buyout window for Pittsburgh would likely be used to buy Petry out to save like 3.25 mil then trade the Sharks Granlund, Rutta, and DeSmith so they can get Karlsson at 8 or 8.5 mil.
Click to expand...
I really like the idea of the Sharks taking back both Petry and Granlund. Both have negative value based on their contracts but both can provide minutes for the Sharks and be competent which will let the Sharks bring up their prospects slowly without being rushed. Also they can help prospects develop as they don’t want Eklund receiving passes from Ferraro or Benning on the top PP.

The 2 years of term doesn’t hurt the Sharks at all and they can probably get an asset back for the both in the 25 deadline. An added bonus is taking both also with reduces the retention or increases the return.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Cas

Cas

Conversational Black Hole
Sponsor
Jun 23, 2020
5,957
8,612
gaucholoco3 said:
I

I really like the idea of the Sharks taking back both Petry and Granlund. Both have negative value based on their contracts but both can provide minutes for the Sharks and be competent which will let the Sharks bring up their prospects slowly without being rushed. Also they can help prospects develop as they don’t want Eklund receiving passes from Ferraro or Benning on the top PP.

The 2 years of term doesn’t hurt the Sharks at all and they can probably get an asset back for the both in the 25 deadline. An added bonus is taking both also with reduces the retention or increases the return.
Click to expand...
I agree, but I don't see Petry agreeing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jMoneyBrah
Cas

Cas

Conversational Black Hole
Sponsor
Jun 23, 2020
5,957
8,612
pappaf2 said:
No trade clauses are so annoying. I feel like the number of NTC should be limited to like 2 per team
Click to expand...
Teams can choose not to issue them, or to acquire players who have them. If they struggle to attract players, well, that's just the cost of not having to deal with them.

The biggest issue is that Karlsson's value probably isn't anywhere near as high as his season would have you believe, so we have a massively difficult time moving him. That's on Wilson and Karlsson more than anyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sendhelplease
pappaf2

pappaf2

Registered User
Feb 24, 2009
2,063
784
Bay Area, CA
Cas said:
Teams can choose not to issue them, or to acquire players who have them. If they struggle to attract players, well, that's just the cost of not having to deal with them.

The biggest issue is that Karlsson's value probably isn't anywhere near as high as his season would have you believe, so we have a massively difficult time moving him. That's on Wilson and Karlsson more than anyone else.
Click to expand...
I’m not talking about superstar players like Karlsson, I’m talking about lower level players like Petry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
landshark

landshark

They'll paint the donkey teal if you pay.
Sponsor
Mar 15, 2003
3,789
3,205
outer richmond dist
sharski said:
I use gimp because I'm on poverty time and mgmt will get suspicious if I try to expense a Photoshop license when I'm not a designer

It's definitely enough for chopping memes while you're on the clock though
Click to expand...
For sure. kleki is free too, just web-based instead of an installed program. I like that I can use it on whatever device. No sign ups, don't have to give them an email address. There's not a credit system like NightCafe uses for AI generated pics... I like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan and sharski
Pinkfloyd

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,625
15,325
Folsom
gaucholoco3 said:
I really like the idea of the Sharks taking back both Petry and Granlund. Both have negative value based on their contracts but both can provide minutes for the Sharks and be competent which will let the Sharks bring up their prospects slowly without being rushed. Also they can help prospects develop as they don’t want Eklund receiving passes from Ferraro or Benning on the top PP.

The 2 years of term doesn’t hurt the Sharks at all and they can probably get an asset back for the both in the 25 deadline. An added bonus is taking both also with reduces the retention or increases the return.
Click to expand...
I would have been perfectly fine with the Sharks taking on Petry as part of a Karlsson trade. Problem is it doesn't sound like Petry wants to go to San Jose and is on his no-trade list since he wants to stay close to where his family is. So the only way to get around it where the Pens still get Karlsson without a 3rd team involved is to buy out Petry and move to us Granlund, Rutta, and DeSmith. All guys I'd be perfectly happy taking on. Granlund and Rutta can be kept until their two years are up. DeSmith is probably a 3rd goalie for us until his contract expires. I don't think they can move him nor do I think they can move Kahkonen but letting their contracts expire is an acceptable outcome if it comes to that.
 

Sendhelplease

Registered User
Dec 21, 2020
476
1,018
pappaf2 said:
I’m not talking about superstar players like Karlsson, I’m talking about lower level players like Petry.
Click to expand...
I don't have an issue with them. If I was settling down with my family I would want control over where I play and I think that is the case for a bottom six forward or a top pairing defenseman. If teams don't want the players to have NMCs or NTCs then they should find a way to compensate the players for the loss of control over their destination.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Barrie22

Barrie22

Shark fan in hiding
Aug 11, 2009
25,659
7,202
ontario
Peng suggested a trade involving the hawks.

Penguins get Karlsson 4.5 retained by sharks.

Sharks get Ty Smith, Sam Poulin, 2025 second round pick (1st in 24 or 25 if the penguins win the cup.

Hawks get Petry and 2024 1st round pick (top 5 protected)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Grinner
hohosaregood

hohosaregood

Banned
Sep 1, 2011
33,164
13,818
Barrie22 said:
Peng suggested a trade involving the hawks.

Penguins get Karlsson 4.5 retained by sharks.

Sharks get Ty Smith, Sam Poulin, 2025 second round pick (1st in 24 or 25 if the penguins win the cup.

Hawks get Petry and 2024 1st round pick (top 5 protected)
Click to expand...
Seems like Hawks get more out of this for being a facilitator than the Sharks do. It's like 2 marginal prospects and a conditional 2nd for the Sharks, while the Hawks get a guaranteed 1st and a good player they can flip for more value. Are the hawks even retaining anything here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CupfortheSharks, Sandisfan and Gecklund
Patty Ice

Patty Ice

Mighty Luca
Feb 27, 2002
14,491
4,661
Not California
Barrie22 said:
Peng suggested a trade involving the hawks.

Penguins get Karlsson 4.5 retained by sharks.

Sharks get Ty Smith, Sam Poulin, 2025 second round pick (1st in 24 or 25 if the penguins win the cup.

Hawks get Petry and 2024 1st round pick (top 5 protected)
Click to expand...

Trade the picks and it's decent. Hawks shouldn't get the higher pick for facilitating. The very premise is laughable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CupfortheSharks and Sandisfan

Mafoofoo

Jawesome
Jul 3, 2010
18,922
5,111
Laguna Beach
Barrie22 said:
Peng suggested a trade involving the hawks.

Penguins get Karlsson 4.5 retained by sharks.

Sharks get Ty Smith, Sam Poulin, 2025 second round pick (1st in 24 or 25 if the penguins win the cup.

Hawks get Petry and 2024 1st round pick (top 5 protected)
Click to expand...

How many bottles of whiskey deep is Grier when he makes this trade?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X