Was thinking about the Karlsson trade the other day, and then saw some twitter discussion today about the Burns trade from MIN.
Wild fans were saying they made out pretty well with Coyle, Seto, and the 1st, but I think the absolute opposite. Not only did the 1st bust and Seto unfortunately run into off-ice issues that affected his on-ice value, Coyle at his best was never close to as impactful as Burns at his worst...and Burns was a perennial Norris candidate for years. The Sharks also made the SCF once and the WCF another time, getting 83 playoff games from 14 series over that time. The Wild meanwhile only got 61 playoff games from 11 series over that same time span and never made it past round 2.
To me, that's a slam dunk "Sharks won the trade".
Now when I think about the Karlsson trade, I can't help but still feel that we're "winners" of the trade as long as Ottawa doesnt make the ECF while Stutzle and Norris are on the team. Like yes, SJS is on a major down swing while Ottawa is on a major upswing, but as far as I'm concerned, they haven't done anything in the seasons following the trade. The Sharks meanwhile have made the WCF and Karl won the Norris (which has franchise value).
Anyone else feel the same way? or is this train of thought major copium?