Is finding top end playmakers really that much easier to find, then goal scorers? Considering the sharks have had 1 of them in the past 20+ years i would guess not. But we have had like 5 that have been late 30's early 40's for goals in that time period.
Its easier to hit 500 goals, then it is to hit 1000 assists. Which should be the other way around as there are 2 assists on a goal.
Hitting 1000 assists is nearly unthinkable, as only 13 players have ever done it.
There has been 37 players to reach 500 goals. For assists to get around that same amount of players to do it, has to go down to 800 assists.
It's a very fair point. Seems to be at least from what I've seen.
2023 - 60 70 pt players, 54 30 goal scorers and 19 40 goal scorers
2022 - 50 70 pt players, 51 30 goal scorers and 17 40 goal scorers
2021 - 37 48 pt players (in shortened season that's a 70 pt pace) and 29 21 goal scorers (in shortened season that's a 30 goal pace) and 7 28 goal scorers (40g in 82ga)
2020 - 37 61 pt players (70 pt pace), 34 26 (30 goal pace) goal scorers and 10 36 (40 goal pace) goal scorers
So there are slightly more 70 pt players than 30 goal scorers and many more 70 pt players than 40 goal scorers. That said, my larger point is these are players that I believe are easier to acquire. I'd look to see how many FAs or trades there were of 70 pt players vs. 30-40 goal scorers.
Perhaps I'm biased as a Devils fan where I'm used to 70 pt production but don't have many clinical finishers (Timo and Toffoli being two of them now). Conversely seems like Sharks fall on the other end of the spectrum, being sniper heavy and playmaker light for awhile. The team seems to have had more A+ finishers in the last 2 decades (Marleau, Meier, Cheechoo, Hertl) but not as many amazing playmakers (Joe^2, Couture).
His character concerns are him thinking he is bigger then the entire team as a rookie after just a handful of games in the KHL.
Could you elaborate? Is there a clip or something where he said that or is that the impression? I'm not aware of that