Speculation: 2022-23 Sharks Roster Discussion Part II

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sheng RT'd him on this one so it's probably happening I think. Makes sense since we don't have enough forwards even if we were to recall Kaut

Also this:


Hertl, Couture, Barabanov, Zetterlund, Johnsson, Gregor, Lorentz, Svechnikov, Sturm, Lindblom, Labanc, Kaut. They would have 12 if Kaut came up.

But instead Eklund is coming up.

Eklund-Hertl-Zetterlund, Johnsson-Couture-Barabanov, Gregor-Sturm-Svechnikov, Lindblom-Lorentz-Labanc
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
Hertl, Couture, Barabanov, Zetterlund, Johnsson, Gregor, Lorentz, Svechnikov, Sturm, Lindblom, Labanc, Kaut. They would have 12 if Kaut came up.

But instead Eklund is coming up.

Eklund-Hertl-Zetterlund, Johnsson-Couture-Barabanov, Gregor-Sturm-Svechnikov, Lindblom-Lorentz-Labanc

Shockingly I don’t hate this lineup? Pretty fast, hard working, etc. I mean only like 4 players can score but still!
 
You're right about their chemistry. It seems like EK has guys he trusts more than others and I've noticed he seems to trust Barabanov (and Meier :() more than others for playmaking. Would've been sweet for them to go to Edmonton because I think that would've helped them a lot more than the moves they made did.

I just hope Grier plans on cooking some Boston Clam Chowda in a few hours and not Beef Stew.
Update: It was beef stew.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan
So, uh, this Peterson guy we got for Reedy might be okay? Found this piece from last spring after the Stars acquired Namestnikov (oh, the irony!) and pulled Peterson out of the lineup in favor of him--and how that seemed like a bad idea because of how useful Peterson had been: Taking Jacob Peterson out of the lineup isn't in the Stars' best interests
The problem with doing that here and taking Peterson out is that it takes one of the Stars’ most productive offensive players out of the lineup. Looking virtually at any advanced metric, Peterson isn’t a quality bottom-six forward; he’s one of the six best forwards on the Stars. That doesn’t necessarily mean he’s graduated into “top-six talent” category yet, because the Stars’ top forwards (beyond the top line) have mostly all played in the middle-six category range, but Peterson has been one of the six best forwards on this team, this season.
Screen-Shot-2022-03-24-at-5.39.29-PM.png
 
I mean Labanc is actually fairly skilled, I think he should be on the third line but..

He's not good enough to have good top 6 production, but he's too one-dimensional to be anything other than a top 6 guy (unless with Thornton who basically was 2C lite that year). He's not a good skater, and although he has a decent shot, he doesn't have a quick release so he needs good players to get him the puck in good spots. Honestly he's one of the more frustrating players to watch I've seen because there's like 60% of a good player but the other 40% will always keep him from his potential.
 
He's not good enough to have good top 6 production, but he's too one-dimensional to be anything other than a top 6 guy (unless with Thornton who basically was 2C lite that year). He's not a good skater, and although he has a decent shot, he doesn't have a quick release so he needs good players to get him the puck in good spots. Honestly he's one of the more frustrating players to watch I've seen because there's like 60% of a good player but the other 40% will always keep him from his potential.

I know, he’s a wild ride. He’s the San Jose Sharks in human form. Sometimes you’re like wait is he good?! And then other times you’re like, why can’t he do anything at all…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad