Hayes is scoring around his norm, and has a low secondary assist and Sh%. So it's very sustainable, at a top 2nd line level.
And his defense is much better at LW, where he doesn't have to skate as much nor has the same defensive responsibilities as at center.
Last 25 games (since he was put on the LW with Laughton and Allison (MacEwen for a half dozen games):
CF 50.81%, CFrel +3.22, xGF 54.85%, xGFrel +7.72.
Teams will look at him as a LW who can fill in at center for a few games in case of injury.
Why I like what I've seen from Ginning in a few AHL games more than Zamula:
Ginning doesn't skate as well or pass as well as Zamula, but he's far more physical and knows his limitations.
Plays a safe game, makes the first pass out of the D-zone and doesn't get caught up ice.
Zamula's problem is mental, he's been turning over the puck too much, and for a guy who isn't a dynamic offensive player, being careful with the puck is a must, he has to be efficient to have value. He's not going end to end, and he's always going to struggle with the physical part of the game in the D-zone and along the boards. So he has to be smart and crisp with the puck.
Zamula has more upside, but when you're 22, potential starts to become a dirty word. He's only 2 months younger than Ginning.
Ginning +18 in 40 games, Zamula -4 in 22 games, on the same team.
At some point it stops being a statistical fluke and starts indicating something about how they play the game.
ES
Ginning 40g 2-11 13
Zamula 22g 0-4 4