Beef Invictus
Revolutionary Positivity
.
You know other than being an obnoxious contrarian, you don't have a clue?
I have never before seen a case of projection this severe.
.
You know other than being an obnoxious contrarian, you don't have a clue?
Well, I'm smarter than Beef, so there's that.
I don't "cherry pick," I give the rationale behind every inflection point I try to identify.
Data mining (picking the model that provides the desired result) is a no-no, but there is a legitimate form of data mining, which requires accounting for the order in which you test models, but that's far more sophisticated than the modeling used by hockey sites.
The problem is that how a team performs does change over a season as personnel change and players adjust to schemes, so you can't assume an average over the whole season is a valid predictor of future performance. So you want to identify any sustained changes in performance and the reasons for those changes. This is SOP in time series modeling, testing for inflection points (where the underlying model changes), but would probably be difficult to implement in the hockey stat context.
To me, there are three inflection points this season, the first 10 games, where everyone agrees the team looked like shit but was carried by Hart, the next 16 games, when they got comfortable with Torts' scheme but the lines and D-pairs were in constant flux, and starting in Dec 7, when JVR returned, York came up and the lines and D-pairs became set (with Allison replacing MacEwen a week or so later).
To me, if I want to judge the players and the team going forward, Dec 7 is the starting point, b/c the players are in a "comfort zone" and can't blame adjustments or getting used to their linemates for any struggles. And we see a number of players settle down at that point, Frost, Laughton, especially.
Practically all those "metrics" are flawed since they rely on naive linear correlations.
There are some serious issues with biased measures, left out variable error, etc. And chemistry matters but is hard to measure.
The "more sophisticated" metrics have similar weaknesses, they go into deeper detail but then have smaller samples.
But the real problem is that the available raw data is fundamentally flawed, so at best all you can get from them is some suggestive numbers that need to be validated by eyeballs. Proprietary team statistics should be better, b/c they have the money to do more detailed analysis (who was actually responsible for good or bad) and thus work with better raw data. But since it's proprietary, who knows?
I don't understand why the Flyers are persisting with playing two dmen in OT when their OT record is terrible: 1 and 7.
And they have at least four solid forward combos they could be sending out in OT:
Cates-Konecny
Frost-Tippett
Hayes-Farabee
Laughton-Allison
Gauging the attitude of too many fans, apathy has set in. They have become irrelevant. Ask friends if they want to go to a game and the answer is negative. They're not worth the time and money. Nothing to see of value there.They don’t want to fire Fletcher just like they don’t want to commit to a full rebuild. They’re looking for any reasons to believe that these steps aren’t necessary. Anything good that happens was all by design & anything bad that happens is all bad luck.
Clarke & Co. don’t even think Fletcher’s job status should be questioned right now. He’d be your GM next year if business ramifications wasn’t the only thing getting Comcast hesitant on that front.
Nativist Son, more like it. KKKongratulations!Dude literally won an award for being born here.
Proof that speed is crucialLaughton and TK are scoring goals for fun on the PK, so maybe try them together in overtime? The Flyers have the worst record of any team in OT except Florida, so it couldn't hurt.
NHL Stats
The official source for NHL Stats including skaters, goalies, teams stats and more.www.nhl.com
ASF's impassioned nepotism rant shows just how interconnected and *small* the Flyers are. I knew about many of the things in his timeline, but it's the first time I see it all laid out in chronological order and how each moves links to another parallel move.
I wonder what the reaction inside the Flyers' organization has been...
It's pretty bad, but you can probably show this to some extent for all teams.ASF's impassioned nepotism rant shows just how interconnected and *small* the Flyers are. I knew about many of the things in his timeline, but it's the first time I see it all laid out in chronological order and how each moves links to another parallel move.
I wonder what the reaction inside the Flyers' organization has been...
Is there anyway someone could expound on this or timestamp the juiciness?ASF's impassioned nepotism rant shows just how interconnected and *small* the Flyers are. I knew about many of the things in his timeline, but it's the first time I see it all laid out in chronological order and how each moves links to another parallel move.
I wonder what the reaction inside the Flyers' organization has been...
I hope they keep doing it. Lose lose loseUsing 2 D in OT is an all timer baffling move. just another embarrassing feather in the cap for the flyers
It's pretty bad, but you can probably show this to some extent for all teams.
There's a pretty small population of eligible canddidates for HC, GM, assistant GM, etc.
32 HCs, maybe 64-96 assistant coaches, 32 AHL HCs, same with GMs and assistant GMs, head of NHL personnel, development and so on.
So at any time only a few hundred around the league, most of whom have worked for a number of others as they climb the ladder.
You can see it in the NFL where it feels like half the league has worked for Andy Reid at some point in their careers!
Is there anyway someone could expound on this or timestamp the juiciness?
Don’t currently have the time to listen to the whole pod.
What I understood from his article is, over the entirety of their history, the Flyers have demonstrated that they are perfectly willing to forego experience or qualifications when the candidate is also a son, or a father, or a friend.
Of course this happens in all spheres of life. It's not exceptional to the Flyers or hockey.
ASF is saying it just hasn't worked, and enough is enough with the narrow pool of stewards. The Flyers are staring at 48 years without a Stanley Cup, including the most recent decade of futility.
You may be asking yourself, why did I choose today to provide this glimpse into the I-scratch-your-back, you-scratch-mine bit of Flyers history?Because recent events have proven that the Flyers will never fix themselves until there is a complete overhaul of hockey operations and that the new faces in the department are not “in the network,” so to speak.
It's actually an article -
Flyers Stuck in Purgatory Because of Decades Relying on King-Making "Network"
Professional sports, in general, have operated through the “good ol’ boy network” for the duration of their existence. Hockey, being the smallest of the four major North American sports, has likely had the most frequent occurrence of cronyism and patronage, with players, coaches, executives –...www.crossingbroad.com
Talk to me when 8 of those points didn't come against an Arizona team that is using AHL Dman Gostisbehere in their top four.Frost pacing for 40 points after spending half the year buried with AHLers. Very impressive.
He's making a lot of "fans" look real stupid right now. Especially the ones who act like usage doesn't impact scoring and a lack of scoring must mean poor play. Also making Charlie look real dumb for acting like Cates is the better player.
Because he's a defensively oriented LW learning to play center in the NHL?Why is Cates still scoring like a 4th liner despite being glued to TK? Not enough "tough love"?
yea best to forget Bedard and just keep doing what we've been doing. cuz its working so well these last 50 years...Can't imagine why they haven't won a Cup in nearly 50 f***ing years.