LegionOfDoom91
Registered User
Well they would basically be the only analytical group to value the Risto and Deslauriers types. Considering they brought outsiders in, that’s just not a likely scenario. But I also recognize there are lots of private datasets that are not available to the public…so I guess it is possible that they are using some model that shows these crappy players have value.
But honestly, it’s most likely Fletch is just not listening to them. He talked about wanting Risto for years. We know he loves the perceived hard workers, low event players.
Charlie said around the time of the extension that the analytic department presented a case against Ristolainen just like they did at the time of the initial trade. Both times their recommendations were ignored. As the hockey people just liked Ristolainen too much to value what the analytics say/said about him. They concluded the analytics are missing it with a player like Ristolainen.
He also talked about everything he’s ever discussed with analytic people in the private & public spheres is that the variance isn’t going to be that greatly different. In regards to a bad player like Ristolainen he said they’re all gonna conclude he’s bad it’s just to what degree. He said the variance isn’t going to be that greatly different.
You can fire them for all I care along with everybody else but do we really think they’re going to win a battle in this current industry over the likes Fletcher, Lombardi, Clarke, Holmgren, etc.? These guys are all older school hockey guy types who if they feel strongly about something they’re not going to come off it no matter what is presented. All of these guys have made similar mistakes before even Ristolainen.
Last edited: