2022/23 Roster Thread XV: Where Optional Skates are Mandatory

Status
Not open for further replies.

prototypical4thliner

Registered User
Jan 12, 2017
4,204
6,355
I'm not curious about very much concerning hockey anymore, but I am really curious whether or not Ghost knows that there are people here (in the Flyers fanbase) who both understand hockey and appreciate him as a player. There is just so much bullshit about him from the usual suspects on social media that I wouldn't be surprised if he thinks we all think that he is soft and useless.
Not enough of them to make him believe we aren’t a mass of Neanderthals.
 

Kelmitchell2

Registered User
Aug 30, 2020
4,303
7,217
If Hart were on the trading block. Any guesses/opinions to what his value would be?
2 1sts I'd assume woukd be the start, based off of age and, and having another year, maybe a 1st an a prospect and a 2nd? Not sure, but could bring in a haul, however he should be a building block for this team (depending on what his new contract may look like)
 

Striiker

Former Flyers Fan
Jun 2, 2013
90,304
157,001
Pennsylvania
As you can see, that regression is hitting Giroux hard. Definitely not that he was on an offensively inept team and horribly misused in Philly, since clearly his struggles have followed him to Florida and Ottawa

ddf054c09e9ca1600194ba0dadb3fc0b.png
 

blackjackmulligan

Registered User
Jun 17, 2022
3,485
1,659
2 1sts I'd assume woukd be the start, based off of age and, and having another year, maybe a 1st an a prospect and a 2nd? Not sure, but could bring in a haul, however he should be a building block for this team (depending on what his new contract may look like)
Not sure a goalie would have that type of value. All depends on the team as 2 late first may not be that appealing.

Here is the thing after 2023/24 he will need a new long term big money deal. Figure 8 years at what 6 million per (or more) at age 26. Where does that line up with when this team may start to contend. Flyers are in such a bad spot all one can do is laugh.



TK and Ivan also free agents after 2025. Should they commit 8 year deals to those 2 at age 28 (I think)?
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,561
171,392
Armored Train
Not sure a goalie would have that type of value. All depends on the team as 2 late first may not be that appealing.

Here is the thing after 2023/24 he will need a new long term big money deal. Figure 8 years at what 6 million per (or more) at age 26. Where does that line up with when this team may start to contend. Flyers are in such a bad spot all one can do is laugh.



TK and Ivan also free agents after 2025. Should they commit 8 year deals to those 2 at age 28 (I think)?

Do you believe that if they take long-term deals here it means they're awful non-competitive losers?
 

blackjackmulligan

Registered User
Jun 17, 2022
3,485
1,659
You're the one who expresses these standards, not me.
just playing your game is all with question back. so then why re-sign here if you were them? What is your take?

To answer your question. I think it plays in that they are very comfortable in their current situation to re-sign. Also not taking the risk of injury and taking the cash. Can’t fault one for that.; if that is how they are wired. Knowing I was gonna get paid I look elsewhere. There is nothing appealing playing for the Flyers or in this city at this time.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,561
171,392
Armored Train
just playing your game is all with question back. so then why re-sign here if you were them? What is your take?

To answer your question. I think it plays in that they are very comfortable in their current situation to re-sign. Also not taking the risk of injury and taking the cash. Can’t fault one for that.; if that is how they are wired. Knowing I was gonna get paid I look elsewhere. There is nothing appealing playing for the Flyers or in this city at this time.

Oh ok so it's loser behavior when Giroux does it, but fine when they do. Thanks for confirming your double standard and proving your opinion on Giroux is nonsense.
 

BernieParent

In misery of redwings of suckage for a long time
Mar 13, 2009
25,198
46,026
Chasm of Sar (north of Montreal, Qc)
He probably did the same sneer and growl even when he was a baby.
"Uh uh. I know what you're thinking. 'Did he puke up all of his formula or only some?' Well to tell you the truth in all this excitement I kinda lost track myself. But having digested 3 hours' worth of the stuff and pushed it into my bowels, which would blow this diaper clean off, you've gotta ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya, Mom?"
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,129
22,260
Torts doesn't look dumb, people scoffed that he'd bench high priced veterans when he was hired, well, he's a man of his word, you play the right way or you sit. Now his idea of merit may not coincide with Magua or Beef, but it's his team, he's the HC, so he's not going to take advice from a message board.

Hayes comes off poorly, compare to TK, Allison or others when they were benched, they were told why, they worked to fix the problem, got back into the lineup and it was never held against them. As Torts pointed out, it wasn't the turnover, he doesn't bench players for one mistake, rather, after you tell someone repeatedly, if they don't change, well, there are few other options. Hayes acts as he's the victim, when he's been slow to back check, sloppy with the puck, out of position, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernieParent

renberg

Registered User
Dec 31, 2003
7,258
7,523
Lewes Delaware
forums.hfboards.com
As a fan of both I have a hard time picturing torts benching ghost. In fact I think smoll boy big effort would have gotten him back on the top pairing.
Interesting thought. I agree that Torts would have found a way to make excellent use out of Ghost. He'd probably try to use him in some of the ways that he worked Werenski. I don't believe that he would have got into a war with him and demand that he be traded.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,129
22,260
Ah, so now we no longer support Cevin Hayes because the God Emperor says so?

Hayes is the same player he has always been. We have recognized that. We have criticized him for years.
I think it's a matter of him not being suited to the up tempo scheme run by Torts, he's a deliberate player who was never that fast and has lost a stride coming off two years of injury and medical insult. He would have value to certain teams that play a "half court" style of hockey, or if you could pair him with a strong defensive center who could cover for his defensive flaws.

The other factor is Hayes thought he was coming to a competing team, not a rebuilding situation, and he may not feel very motivated. It's obvious that this team probably won't be competitive until the end of his contract, so he probably welcomes a change of scenery.

He's not playing awful, he's scoring, he's not a total sieve on defense. Hayes is 30, doesn't fit the scheme and is probably destined to wing (which they probably expected when they signed him). So I'm sure they want to move on from him, but not at a high price.

HDCA/60 (last 21 games):
TK 14.26
Laughton 13.90
Frost 12.40
Hayes 12.31
Tippett 12.19
JVR 11.98
Farabee 10.86
Cates 9.42
 

blackjackmulligan

Registered User
Jun 17, 2022
3,485
1,659
Oh ok so it's loser behavior when Giroux does it, but fine when they do. Thanks for confirming your double standard and proving your opinion on Giroux is nonsense.
No double standard at all. Thanks for your opinion. What false narrative you pushing this month?

Now answer my question in that post.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,129
22,260
Interesting thought. I agree that Torts would have found a way to make excellent use out of Ghost. He'd probably try to use him in some of the ways that he worked Werenski. I don't believe that he would have got into a war with him and demand that he be traded.
Torts wouldn't have used Ghost like Werenski, who is a true 1st pair D-man and much bigger and more physical.

First, he would have beat the dangerous plays out of Ghost, like dancing along the blue line and getting stripped.
Then if Ghost responded he would have used him a lot in offense first situations, like O-zone faceoffs, etc.
He would have sheltered Ghost, b/c winning board battles in the D-zone is a key element of defense for Torts, and that isn't one of Ghost's strong points.
But he would have liked Ghost's ability to drive play in the O-zone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad