Ghosts Beer
I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
- Feb 10, 2014
- 22,783
- 16,531
Starting?!
Our coach did it before it was cool.
Bellows on the second line ? Do you even read the crap you post . Bellows who has 0 points this year with us and was let go for nothing by the Islanders . He has played a little bit better the last couple games but has done nothing to warrant a spot anywhere other than LV .Interesting that Hayes is moved to wing, Torts is really running a full-time audition.
Sedlak earned a shot at playing up in the lineup, of course he's no more a 2C than Frost is a 1C, but he has played well.
Cates is in the role he should be, as the center of a defensive oriented "energy" line.
Poor Laczynski, gets to play center but has to drag Willman and Brown around.
This all changes by January with everyone back, and now it looks like Atkinson as well.
But I can't see how Hayes can stay at wing without better centers, I don't think Sedlak will last in the top 6.
JVR - Hayes - Atkinson
Bellows - Frost - Tippett
Farabee - Cates - TK
Deslauriers - Sedlak - Laczynski/Allison
Just a week or so ago he was casting Bellows aside and now that Torts has decided to showcase him and move him up it must be defended.Bellows on the second line ? Do you even read the crap you post . Bellows who has 0 points this year with us and was let go for nothing by the Islanders . He has played a little bit better the last couple games but has done nothing to warrant a spot anywhere other than LV .
You use to post Rubtsov was coming up cause he had a decent couple games then Susko and the list goes on . Heck you post Wisdom is coming up this spring , you know Wisdom who has not scored a goal yet this year . Ratcliffe , Hodgson , Hogberg and the list goes on of players that are NOT NHL players and you keep pumping their tires . Give it a rest already .
Yup, prior to the season I said that if every player other than Ellis (he’s dead after all) stayed healthy this was at best a 75-80 point team. Now? They won’t break 55 points and should be in a dog fight with Arizona, Chicago, Anaheim and Columbus for dead last.It's still an awful team when healthy. Their ceiling is about 25th place. You get those 7 players back, and then what? Half the roster is still trash.
mike knuble says hi. (just kidding, but seriously)Bellows earned a second shot, I see no reason not to play him along with Frost and Tippett.
They're all 23, they've got enough experience you shouldn't worry about them being overmatched - since that merely tells you they're not that good, not that they're not NHL ready.
I have no problem with these players, or Allison, Laczynski, MacEwen, N Cates being asked to "sink or swim."
At some point you're no longer a "promising prospect" but a NHL player (or not).
I'd put Lycksell in the same boat, and Ginning next season (with 230 SHL games, he doesn't need 3 years in the AHL).
If you're 23 or older, with 200+ professional/college games, there's not much "adjustment" left.
So they'd be my priorities this season, find out who is a NHL player and it what role.
Short term: I can't walk, I can only hobbleAll of this is an inconvenience the same way shooting yourself in the foot is an inconvenience. Sure, you can probably still get around, but go ahead and toss any chance of winning a foot race out the window.
Maybe the plan is to hire the best analysts simply to keep them away from clubs that would actually listen to them.They spend on analytics just to ignore them.
There are always late bloomers, but if a guy is seriously bad at the NHL level, odds are you can waive him and send him down to the AHL and give him a chance to turn it around.mike knuble says hi. (just kidding, but seriously)
Welp, Charlie said it:
"Ownership essentially rubber-stamped a rebuild year this season, without officially calling it one. You know what happens in a rebuild year? The team loses — a lot. So firing Fletcher as a reaction to the losses that on some level they knew were coming doesn’t make a lot of sense. Perhaps they didn’t think it was going to be quite this bad, but they knew it would probably going to be bad, especially once it became clear that Ryan Ellis and Couturier weren’t riding in anytime soon to save the day."
I don't think it saves Chuck, but it does show they didn't hire Torts as a quick turnaround artist, and why they didn't go after JG.
I still contend it was the interview process that opened their eyes, I'm sure potential candidates did not want to promise a quick turnaround and gave them a reality check with regard to this team.
If they fire Chuck, it'll be at the end of the season and part of a house cleaning, which you need to do after the season b/c you can't easily replace people mid-season. Problem is who in the organization could preside over a reorganization?
I’d say it’s about as good management as being given a mandate to win and not winning.If they rubberstamped a rebuild and then ever since have acted as far opposite of a rebuilding team as possible, is that good management?
YupA rebuild for one season but not longer than that?
That's a retool. No team can rebuild nor has ever been rebuilt after a single season.