Rumor: 2022-2023 Trade Rumors and Free Agency: The Search for a 2C

Status
Not open for further replies.
They need D. Girard would help them a lot.

G isn't the type of defensemen that Zito normally goes after... and more than just needing D, they need Ekblad to actually stay healthy. It isn't a top 10 group when healthy, but plenty fine until closer to the deadline.

The guy Florida would want is Toews (or Byram). That's where the deal would have to be centered.
 

Dating back to last season, the Canucks have made several players available for trade, including the likes of Tyler Myers, Conor Garland and Tanner Pearson, and have entertained calls on Brock Boeser. The team, according to sources, would like to move Oliver Ekman-Larsson, but he owns a no-movement clause and has not been willing to waive it.

“We’re going to look to make bigger deals and open up a lot more cap space so we can be involved in some of the talks for some of the players that are going to be available next off-season,” Rutherford said. “Or prior to that. We’re willing to do something right now if something's available to us.”

One key part of the roster that needs to be figured out this season is captain Bo Horvat, who is in the final year of his contract.

Horvat, 27, currently leads the team with 10 goals in 12 games, is believed to be looking for a long-term contract extension worth north of $7.5 million per season. The two sides remain far apart on a deal, as Rutherford confirmed.

“There hasn’t been any movement,” he said. “Our priority is to keep Bo. We recognize what can do for us. I’m very proud of him, I give him a lot of credit. He could lose his focus and be thinking about what’s going to happen with his contract and whatnot, but he came in ready to play and he’s played terrific for us. I hope that keeps going. I hope we can sign him. If we can’t sign him, the better we play, the better return we’re going to get for him. So, it works out for everybody. But ideally, we can figure out a way to keep Bo in Vancouver.”

If the Canucks and Horvat don’t agree to an extension by the trade deadline and the Canucks are still far from a playoff spot, there will be plenty of suitors interested in acquiring Vancouver’s captain, who comes with a $5.5 million salary cap hit.
 
G isn't the type of defensemen that Zito normally goes after... and more than just needing D, they need Ekblad to actually stay healthy. It isn't a top 10 group when healthy, but plenty fine until closer to the deadline.

The guy Florida would want is Toews (or Byram). That's where the deal would have to be centered.


LOL. No way does Bennett get you Toews or Byram.
 
No it would have a #1D and five 5-7D. At least the top-6 has at least 3-4 actual top-6 guys lol

I'd say as it stands... 2 top line guys, 3 middle 6 (not top 6) complementary sorts, 1 3rd liner, 4 bottom 6ers/4th liners, and 2 AHL depth... not really all that different.
 
Read it multiple times. That’s not what he said.

You just have the reading comprehension of a child.

Go tell your therapist. It is what he said in response to a discussion about Bennett.

I did. He said the only dmen the Panthers would have interest in is Bo/Toews. So any trade for a dman between the two of us would be around those two Dmen.
And it was a discussion about Bennett.
 
Has Reinhart been at C for Florida?
He spotted there for a time, but as Lundell took over a center role full time, he was primarily on the wing. He's like a very good version of Schmaltz... can play there in spurts, but his weaknesses start to come out when left there over a longer term.
 
He spotted there for a time, but as Lundell took over a center role full time, he was primarily on the wing. He's like a very good version of Schmaltz... can play there in spurts, but his weaknesses start to come out when left there over a longer term.
He had a bunch of coaches in the NHL (like 3 or 4 in Buffalo alone) and none of them kept him at C. Safe to say he's a winger.
 
Go tell your therapist. It is what he said in response to a discussion about Bennett.


And it was a discussion about Bennett.

You really should try understanding what was said. I'll try to say it in a longer form here.

Florida wouldn't want G. They don't like that style of defensemen and it doesn't fit what they hope to build. It isn't that G sucks, just not their flavor.

Off of the Avs, that have any value (so not the Manson/EJ garbage), and would potentially even be moved (so not Makar)... the only players of value to Florida would be Toews or Byram. If you want to pry off one of their centers utilizing one of the Avs' defensemen, you have to center the deal around one of those two defensemen.
 
I did. He said the only dmen the Panthers would have interest in is Bo/Toews. So any trade for a dman between the two of us would be around those two Dmen.

I mean to be fair he said "that's where the deal would have to be centered" when the entire discussion was trading for Bennett. Nobody else was mentioned and it wasn't like he was talking about a different player on Florida. Obviously Bennett doesn't have the same value so I took it as Bennett++ for Byram/Toews because they'd have no interest in Girard for Bennett.

I'd do Toews for Lundell. I think it makes sense for both teams on paper. I don't think Colorado will move Toews tho and I'm not really sure if Florida would even listen to Lundell offers.
 
He had a bunch of coaches in the NHL (like 3 or 4 in Buffalo alone) and none of them kept him at C. Safe to say he's a winger.
Totally agree... he can play there when injuries hit, but he's a winger (and a pretty damn good one)
 
Don’t be shocked if JT Miller is traded despite his contract extension.

If he is, the Avs need to be all in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redacted
I mean to be fair he said "that's where the deal would have to be centered" when the entire discussion was trading for Bennett. Nobody else was mentioned and it wasn't like he was talking about a different player on Florida. Obviously Bennett doesn't have the same value so I took it as Bennett++ for Byram/Toews because they'd have no interest in Girard for Bennett.

I'd do Toews for Lundell. I think it makes sense for both teams on paper. I don't think Colorado will move Toews tho and I'm not really sure if Florida would even listen to Lundell offers.
The only way you get a perk up for Lundell is if you are offering Byram.

Don’t be shocked if JT Miller is traded despite his contract extension.

If he is, the Avs need to be all in.
I'm expecting it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cousin Eddie
You really should try understanding what was said. I'll try to say it in a longer form here.

Florida wouldn't want G. They don't like that style of defensemen and it doesn't fit what they hope to build. It isn't that G sucks, just not their flavor.

Off of the Avs, that have any value (so not the Manson/EJ garbage), and would potentially even be moved (so not Makar)... the only players of value to Florida would be Toews or Byram. If you want to pry off one of their centers utilizing one of the Avs' defensemen, you have to center the deal around one of those two defensemen.
and since only Lundell or Barkov is worth one of these 2 and they aren't trading them...
 
  • Like
Reactions: redacted
You really should try understanding what was said. I'll try to say it in a longer form here.

Florida wouldn't want G. They don't like that style of defensemen and it doesn't fit what they hope to build. It isn't that G sucks, just not their flavor.

Off of the Avs, that have any value (so not the Manson/EJ garbage), and would potentially even be moved (so not Makar)... the only players of value to Florida would be Toews or Byram. If you want to pry off one of their centers utilizing one of the Avs' defensemen, you have to center the deal around one of those two defensemen.
They don't want D that are excellent at transitioning the puck even though that's what beat Tampa (yes I know he was injured)? Not buying it.

I realize you like to try to disguise the fatalistic as "realism" but this? Really?
 
I mean to be fair he said "that's where the deal would have to be centered" when the entire discussion was trading for Bennett. Nobody else was mentioned and it wasn't like he was talking about a different player on Florida. Obviously Bennett doesn't have the same value so I took it as Bennett++ for Byram/Toews because they'd have no interest in Girard for Bennett.

I'd do Toews for Lundell. I think it makes sense for both teams on paper. I don't think Colorado will move Toews tho and I'm not really sure if Florida would even listen to Lundell offers.
I mean it definitely started about Bennett. But I think it’s obvious Hench wasnt saying that it would take Bo or Toews to get Bennett out of FLA. Just that any deal between the two teams would be centered around Bo/Toews. Not Bo/Toews for Bennett.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad