I wonder after drafting 3- 1sts this year and adding them to Snuggs, Bolduc, Neighbors, where that ranks our prospect pool?
Prolly pretty decent.
I wonder after drafting 3- 1sts this year and adding them to Snuggs, Bolduc, Neighbors, where that ranks our prospect pool?
It would be a strong group, but I’d be very surprised to see us make 3 first round picks. I’m pretty confident we see a Schenn trade at the draft (off the radar player, 1st rounder involved, shedding a questionable contract in the process).I wonder after drafting 3- 1sts this year and adding them to Snuggs, Bolduc, Neighbors, where that ranks our prospect pool?
Pretty high I’d say. Neighbours would likely be considered graduated but Snuggerud and Bolduc had good seasons. Hofer would be ranked higher and Alexandrov likely adds a small boost too. Add Zach Dean to the list. Then add 3 1sts to that? It’d be a good group, likely pushing top-10.I wonder after drafting 3- 1sts this year and adding them to Snuggs, Bolduc, Neighbors, where that ranks our prospect pool?
Hard to say what trade options there will be.It would be a strong group, but I’d be very surprised to see us make 3 first round picks. I’m pretty confident we see a Schenn trade at the draft (off the radar player, 1st rounder involved, shedding a questionable contract in the process).
I’m even questioning if we make 2 first round picks. I could see us trying to package the picks to move up, though I could see there not being that many takers and we end up making both remaining picks.
Is Thomas going to randomly plummet into 40-50 point range? Dean is not going to be anywhere close to Thomas. We'll be lucky is he can be as good as Barbie.for some reason I think Dean will be better than Thomas. His compete level is extremely high. Sick hands too.
Is Thomas going to randomly plummet into 40-50 point range? Dean is not going to be anywhere close to Thomas. We'll be lucky is he can be as good as Barbie.
Dude. You are way over projecting Dean. I know he's a shiny new toy but he is not the next coming of RoR.Points arent everything. ROR was basically a 55-60 pt center.
Dude. You are way over projecting Dean. I know he's a shiny new toy but he is not the next coming of RoR.
And you're never going to be considered a true top 6 center if you can't produce. Dean has proven nothing except he can produce in the Q. Bolduc has 40 more points in 11 more games in the same league.I’m not saying hes ROR, I’m just saying points aren’t everything.
And you're never going to be considered a true top 6 center if you can't produce. Dean has proven nothing except he can produce in the Q. Bolduc has 40 more points in 11 more games in the same league.
He'll be lucky to sniff those numbers. Unless scoring skyrockets he'll be closer to a 40-45 point 3rd liner who can jump into the top 6 if needed. Just like BarbieTime will tell. Dean has the skill, skating, shot, vision, tenacity and work ethic you want. Much more tenacity and work ethic than Thomas. Probably won’t be the playmaker that Thomas is, but will be a much better 2-way player. Probably a 25g 50-60pt 2-way center
If the return on a pending UFA we were highly unlikely to retain is a player 7 years younger we expect to grow into that same role with similar production who is a cost controlled RFA... That's a great return for a rental!He'll be lucky to sniff those numbers. Unless scoring skyrockets he'll be closer to a 40-45 point 3rd liner who can jump into the top 6 if needed. Just like Barbie
I completely agree with you. I'm 110% fine with Dean turning into Barbie V2.0If the return on a pending UFA we were highly unlikely to retain is a player 7 years younger we expect to grow into that same role with similar production who is a cost controlled RFA... That's a great return for a rental!
If all Dean does is fill a bottom 6 role, with moderate production (20-30 points) for 6 years before leaving as a UFA or via trade, with 1/2 seasons scoring 40+ points - that's still a net positive over getting nothing or a pick which might not develop.
Barby gave us 410 regular season games and scored 178p over 7 seasons with us for under 2.5m AAV. That's a valuable roster piece, even if Barby was not an impact player, that's still got worth.
Why?Dean will be much better than Barbie.
Why?
Shiny new toy syndrome. Dean's strengths are what we were saying about Barbie in 2013-14More offensive skill, more tenacity and better work ethic. He won’t lay the occasional big hit that Barbie does, but he does everything else better.
Shiny new toy syndrome. Dean's strengths are what we were saying about Barbie in 2013-14
You are going to end up very disappointed.He has a higher ceiling than Barbs. Wait until he fills out and adds strength. He’ll be a tenacious 2-way forward with 25g upside.
Thomas single-handedly willed Hamilton to the championship in his +1 year. Easily the most noticeable forward on both sides of the ice throughout the playoffs. Then walked in as a rookie and was a part of a line that cratered NHL playoff defense on possession, and was the key architect in what's, IMO, the most important goal in franchise history.Time will tell. Dean has the skill, skating, shot, vision, tenacity and work ethic you want. Much more tenacity and work ethic than Thomas. Probably won’t be the playmaker that Thomas is, but will be a much better 2-way player. Probably a 25g 50-60pt 2-way center
You are going to end up very disappointed.
Snuggles is the only one on that list I project to be higherNext you’re going to tell me Snuggs won’t be better then Tarasenko, Bolduc won’t be better than Perron and Neighbors won’t be better than Schenn. You guys are always ruining my hopes lol.