Prospect Info: 2022 - 1st OA] Juraj Slafkovsky (LW) Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Slafkovsky looked better on PP, been more difficult at even strength

Yeah, he is very solid on PP. If he can put at least 25 points this season, that's a good rookie year for him. Next year, 50 points and more will be really good.

So far after 22 games, his game getting better and better, this guy have a solid shot, solid playmaker on PP too. I would be happy if he play with Caufield and Suzuki on PP this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77 and Pomee
I think you are getting way ahead of yourself.....way over thinking this......
I simply stated what my 2 cents is, send him to the tourney, and I think he would be great while there, thus creating some confidence....I am being the optimist, and you are being the pessimist....

Pretty easy to agree to disagree, I just think he would benefit from going to the WJC.

Does anyone know if this has happened years past, where a team has let a kid go, and he lit up the tourney?
Just curious...
How am I overthinking this if all I'm doing is presenting the opposite outcome to what you're proposing?

You think he could be great there and it would create some confidence.

I simply asked, which is a very fair question, what if it's the opposite?

I've never wavered from my take on this, I dont think there's anything for him to gain by going to the WJC.

But I think it's only fair to discuss all potential outcomes if he would go.

If anything, I think you're the one overthinking what kind of impact this tournament has on players.
If you acknowledge that going could boost his confidence, you also have to acknowledge that going could also shatter his confidence if things don't go quite as planned, no?
 
What if he was not hustling that much last game on purpose, just so he would look bad knowing it would lead the management to loan him to wjc? xd
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Adam Michaels
Slaf only has 1 less point than Anderson while having played 3 less games , having limited ice/pp time and being a ten years younger 18 years old rookie. Also has the same number of pts as Gallagher. He'll be fine

Now i know that in the grand scheme on things this comparison doesn't really mean shit lol but just trying to put things in perspective.
 
I don't think the WJC were ever in consideration for Slaf, he is an NHL player. The question is...is he going to be a great one. The real question is would he benefit more playing top 6 minutes against pro's in the AHL vs top 9-12 in the pro's, and really it depends on the player. What I like so far is that he is gradually moving up the depth chart on merit. What I don't like is his skating with his head down which is going to get him seriously hurt.

But I don't think Slaf is someone like Shane Wright, too good for the OHL but not good enough for the NHL (yet). Slaf is playing, and contributing and rarely a question if he's going to be in the lineup with experienced vet's sitting.

I remember Craig Patrick saying something in an article once about how he wished he could take a first round pick and just have him practice / watch from the press box and generally learn so many aspects of what it takes to be just a pro in the NHL without the pressure.

He thinks they'd benefit a lot from it, and I think he's a pretty smart guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 417
Slaf only has 1 less point than Anderson while having played 3 less games , having limited ice/pp time and being a ten years younger 18 years old rookie. Also has the same number of pts as Gallagher. He'll be fine

Now i know that in the grand scheme on things this comparison doesn't really mean shit lol but just trying to put things in perspective.
Josh Anderson is an unfortunate comparable for Slaf. A fully cooked and broken Gallagher is even worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: River Meadow
I remember Craig Patrick saying something in an article once about how he wished he could take a first round pick and just have him practice / watch from the press box and generally learn so many aspects of what it takes to be just a pro in the NHL without the pressure.

This is true and important. When I reflect upon my own experiences in a high-performance professional career there's a few parallels I assume exist to that of a professional player. My education provided me with a strong basis, but it was observing other more experienced and talented professionals that helped develop my capabilities in problem solving, initiative, teamwork, thoroughness, and leadership.

About 25% of my time is client-facing. The other 75% of the time is working and relying on the capabilities I listed above. The client only sees (and cares) about the end product and rarely has a glimpse into the work that happens in the background.

At times I was impatient in my career, but now I look back and am thankful that I had good mentors that brought me along at a good pace in an environment that was conducive to healthy learning and development.

I assume it is similar for professional hockey players. They develop a strong skills basis in junior or European men's professional leagues. We get a glimpse into 25% of their professional lives through hockey games or tweets about practices and training. We are probably not getting a good view of how much planning, execution, learning, etc. goes into training properly, dieting properly, mentally preparing for games. We miss out on the minutiae of professional hockey life like proper stretches, pre-game warm-ups, video coaching. We're not seeing how coaching and mentorship is helping young players make the right reads to break down NHL-level defenses, or how to take initiative on a play without making a critical error that your opponents can take advantage of.

We can project our impatience on them, but the reality is no player is fully polished when they arrive at the NHL, and learning everything - the 25% that's visible and the 75% that's in the background - takes time, reps, experience, mentoring, etc. As I observe and draw parallels on my career, I'm hopeful that for the first time in a long time, young Canadiens players are being brought along at a good pace in an environment that is conducive to healthy learning and development.
 
Slaf only has 1 less point than Anderson while having played 3 less games , having limited ice/pp time and being a ten years younger 18 years old rookie. Also has the same number of pts as Gallagher. He'll be fine

Now i know that in the grand scheme on things this comparison doesn't really mean shit lol but just trying to put things in perspective.
It is a good comparison because players from one team have 'almost the same conditions' to work with.
Comparing young players from different teams is more tricky. A young player on a good team can benefit and have more points than on a bad one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad