The Madrigal
Registered User
Just like I said yesterday
Provorov - Jones
Sanheim - Larsson
York - Braun
Morin
Provorov - Jones
Sanheim - Larsson
York - Braun
Morin
Just remember, Nashville was looking to move him because of the ED. They can now protect 4+4....or even 3+5 and not lose Arvid for nothing(based on what Preds fans are saying)The Kings just stole Arvidsson from Nashville. Not that we needed another winger or more salary but hey Chuck perhaps you could do your f***ing job and start making some moves to improve this team.
I get that there were other factors involved and his production went backwards the last two years. He is a 28 year old with two 30 goal seasons and another 29 goal season though. That's a small price to pay for the Kings for that type of player. Even if he just consistently give them 20-25 goals I'm sure they would be perfectly fine with parting with a 2nd and future 3rd for someone like that.Just remember, Nashville was looking to move him because of the ED. They can now protect 4+4....or even 3+5 and not lose Arvid for nothing(based on what Preds fans are saying)
How can Makar be their best defensemen? He’s not the correct mold. He’s a smol boy who scores…
agreed.I get that there were other factors involved and his production went backwards the last two years. He is a 28 year old with two 30 goal seasons and another 29 goal season though. That's a small price to pay for the Kings for that type of player. Even if he just consistently give them 20-25 goals I'm sure they would be perfectly fine with parting with a 2nd and future 3rd for someone like that.
The Kings just stole Arvidsson from Nashville. Not that we needed another winger or more salary but hey Chuck perhaps you could do your f***ing job and start making some moves to improve this team.
agreed.
He was a steal on a contract before. If he is a 40ish point guy, it's still fair. All I was saying was that for Nashville, they moved him for ED reasons.
But it is funny:
40 pts at $4.25 for a 2nd+3rd is a steal
60 pts at $7 is a "cap dump" that we would have to add to
I don't think it's funny at all. There is a significant difference between a cap hit of 4.5 million and 7 million, that's why. Also the fact that one guy is 28 and the other 32. There is probably an expectation that Arvidsson still has prime years left where as JVR could see a steep decline at any point over the remaining three years of term he has left.agreed.
He was a steal on a contract before. If he is a 40ish point guy, it's still fair. All I was saying was that for Nashville, they moved him for ED reasons.
But it is funny:
40 pts at $4.25 for a 2nd+3rd is a steal
60 pts at $7 is a "cap dump" that we would have to add to
Can someone splain to me how I can be more smarter about hockey and shit?
What does that have anything to do with what I just said? You’re part of the group that’s saying let’s have an informed discussion. When we post something that is informed (doesn’t even have to be right as we cannot predict the future) the responses are always “Oh ok we must be dumb”, “Echo chamber”, “I’m sure the GM is just dumb then”. It’s quite insufferable.I think you're taking yourself too seriously and aren't as smart as you think you are.
Which we know isn't what they want. It's just a phrase used to play the victim and act like they're being unfairly criticized.What does that have anything to do with what I just said? You’re part of the group that’s saying let’s have an informed discussion. When we post something that is informed (doesn’t even have to be right as we cannot predict the future) the responses are always “Oh ok we must be dumb”, “Echo chamber”, “I’m sure the GM is just dumb then”. It’s quite insufferable.
Most people here think that the cost to acquire some of these players creates a worse opportunity cost down the line due to contracts, assets given up, or assets missed out on. All of this is a slippery slope and we’d be kidding ourselves to say Jones isn’t good, but the opportunity cost to acquire him and what his usage would be isn’t beneficial. Then again I assume I’m gonna hear echo chamber, I’m just dumb, or you’re not as smart as you think you are 1,000,000 more times.
Rumors are they made the Arvidsson trade so they could protect Luke KuninWell if the reports were correct and the flyers preferred:
1)Jones
2)Ellis
3)Hamilton
We sure as hell should all hope Jones goes to Chicago or Colorado because that trade almost surely means Nashville is protecting Ellis with 4+4+1.
What does that have anything to do with what I just said? You’re part of the group that’s saying let’s have an informed discussion. When we post something that is informed (doesn’t even have to be right as we cannot predict the future) the responses are always “Oh ok we must be dumb”, “Echo chamber”, “I’m sure the GM is just dumb then”. It’s quite insufferable.
Most people here think that the cost to acquire some of these players creates a worse opportunity cost down the line due to contracts, assets given up, or assets missed out on. All of this is a slippery slope and we’d be kidding ourselves to say Jones isn’t good, but the opportunity cost to acquire him and what his usage would be isn’t beneficial. Then again I assume I’m gonna hear echo chamber, I’m just dumb, or you’re not as smart as you think you are 1,000,000 more times.
Rumors are they made the Arvidsson trade so they could protect Luke Kunin
Can confirm. My gf is vegetarian but when the bacon comes out it's game over.
That's hilarious
Can someone splain to me how I can be more smarter about hockey and shit?
So seeing a few reports that trade talk is picking up….. which means we will see one more trade today between two scrubs and then silence for the next week until Eichel is traded right after the cup final.
As with most of the roster, however, Provorov's 2020-21 season did not match the standards of consistency he set the prior year (or, for that matter, in 2017-18). How much of it had to do with Provorov playing with a revolving door of defense partners in 2020-21 following the early retirement of Matt Niskanen and how much of it was the player himself is tough to fully parse.
...
What is fair to say that Provorov entered the 2020-21 season with very lofty expectations on his shoulders. The Flyers No. 1 defenseman did not have a poor season but he also did not regularly elevate his game to an elite or near-elite level on either side of the puck.
...
Entering the 2021 offseason, one of the Flyers' primary goals is to find a right-side partner for Provorov on the team's top defensive pairing. The inability to fill void left by Niskanen's departure -- in terms of chemistry with Provorov, ice-time and matchup slotting of all three defense pairings, and a steadying presence in times of adversity -- was one of the factors that negatively impacted the club in 2020-21.
This past season, Sanheim had a roller coaster campaign. The positive is that he actually did fine from an analytics standpoint: 54.1 percent Corsi, 51.5 percent Fenwick Close, positive differential in expected goals despite a minus-22 traditional plus-minus rating. He was particularly effective in joining the play up-ice and prolonging puck possession for Philadelphia.
...
The negative: Sanheim and Phil Myers, both as a pairing and individually, struggled mightily at times during the season especially during the team's fateful swoon in March. Sanheim struggled at times with gap management, net-front containment, turnovers under forechecking pressure and unforced turnovers (40 charged giveaways). He took on a penalty killing role in 2019-20 for the first time in his career and showed promise, but was not as effective this year amid teamwide PK struggles.
...
With Sanheim, much of it boils down to a matter of perspective. If someone is looking for him to be a punishing physical presence because he is 6-foot-4 and 200-plus pounds, disappointment is likely. Conversely, if one is looking for a defenseman with the coveted combination of size, mobility and ability to help move the puck up the ice, Sanheim is an above-average second pair NHL defenseman.
...
It is not impossible that Sanheim (or Myers) could be made available under certain trade scenarios this offseason. However, he is not a player whom the Flyers will actively seek to trade despite his arbitration-eligible restricted free agent status. More likely, the team and the Sanheim camp will seek to strike a new bridge deal and he will remain part of the top-three or top-four in ice time among the team's defense corps.
TBH were probably causing some of the delays because were probably in on almost all major trade talk.... Eichel, Jones, Nashville Dmen, Dumba guaranteed Fletch is in on all these players but he can only do 1 trade maybe 2 if he can get rid of JVR/Jake and Ghost. Definitely a scary/exciting time.... scary in the sense we hear rumours of Farabee (which is insane) or Hart. Fletcher can't be that stupid but when your desperate (like ownership seems to be ) you never know.