I Eat Crow
Fear The Mullet
- Jul 9, 2007
- 19,982
- 13,642
2020 Draft & Undrafted Free Agent Thread: Part IV
- Thread starter Krams
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
- Status
- Jul 16, 2005
- 14,857
- 13,013
Holtz or Rossi to me. Might depend.... did we get Stutzle at 3? Then Rossi might be better. Did we get Byfield at 3? Then maybe Holtz is the better pick.
- Jul 16, 2005
- 14,857
- 13,013
Rangers394
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2020
- 902
- 845
VK needs to show he can play first before we trade Buch. Last thing we need to do is trade Buch before VK is ready then we'll have a giant hole at RW.
- Jul 16, 2005
- 14,857
- 13,013
Don’t forget we are getting Lundell when we trade up with our second pick.
I Eat Crow
Fear The Mullet
- Jul 9, 2007
- 19,982
- 13,642
If Edmonton loses, we are guaranteed to have no worse than the 11th overall pick. Lundell territory.
At this point we're either picking #1 or #9-11, so you'd have to assume one of Lafreniere, Perfetti, Rossi, or Lundell is a Ranger unless for some god-forsaken reason we don't pick a center.
Mac n Gs
Drury plz
- Jan 17, 2014
- 22,835
- 13,558
- Jul 16, 2005
- 14,857
- 13,013
I’m sorry, if the Rangers are at 11, and Drysdale and Sanderson both go in the top 7 or so, that means some high tier forward (ie, not the Jarvis/Lundell/Quinn tier) is gonna be there at 9.
I will kinda go apeshit if they don’t try to move up.
11 players and my stipulation was Drysdale and Sanderson go top 7
1) Laf
2) Byfield
3) Stutzle
4) Raymond
5) Perfetti
6) Drysdale
7) Sanderson
8) Holtz
9) Rossi
10) ?
11) Rangers
They gotta try to get to 8 or 9 there.
Unless it’s Perfetti, not as interested in him.
I will kinda go apeshit if they don’t try to move up.
11 players and my stipulation was Drysdale and Sanderson go top 7
1) Laf
2) Byfield
3) Stutzle
4) Raymond
5) Perfetti
6) Drysdale
7) Sanderson
8) Holtz
9) Rossi
10) ?
11) Rangers
They gotta try to get to 8 or 9 there.
Unless it’s Perfetti, not as interested in him.
Ghost of jas
Unsatisfied
After months of listening to @Edge, unless the Rangers win the lottery, my gut feeling is that Lundell will be the pick.
Perfetti is probably going to end up on the wing.
And with the Wings. No secret that they love him and with good reason, he's a beast.
There are a few wingers I'd be happier with than Lundell. We're getting into the range where I'd actually be a little annoyed if they took him lol
Crease
Chief Justice of the HFNYR Court
- Jul 12, 2004
- 24,767
- 27,709
Which one of them is a "gamer" who "forechecks hard" and "finishes his checks" ?
Ghost of jas
Unsatisfied
Askarov is the wild card. If he goes in the top ten, that could change quite a few selections.
We need Askarov to go in the top 10. That’s a major key.
Edit - same thoughts as the post above me at nearly the exact same time
Edit - same thoughts as the post above me at nearly the exact same time
GeorgeKaplan
Registered User
They're picking 1, bucket!
... In that scenario I take Jarvis or Quinn and LMAO at most of the teams picking ahead of us when our guy ends up being better.
Yeah I would be heart broken if Rossi was missed by one spot BUT Quinn/Jarvis/Mercer/Lundell wouldn't be so bad. Maybe even a chance to trade down a few slots if a good second rounder was included. Let's just make sure we pick #1 or top 10.
If Chicago is out of the top 10 who is picking Askarov? Detroit trading down a spot or two and still taking him to solidify their future goaltending?
Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,071
- 40,921
- Status
