- Apr 25, 2006
- 53,877
- 60,287
Nope. You're asking someone to pay for negative value.Maybe the worst analogy of all time.
It's the perfect analogy.
Nope. You're asking someone to pay for negative value.Maybe the worst analogy of all time.
Interesting read/logic about the "Jones to Avalanche" rumor:
Last Word on Baseball: NHL Rumours: Colorado Avalanche, Chicago Blackhawks, Minnesota Wild.
NHL Rumours: Colorado Avalanche, Chicago Blackhawks, Minnesota Wild
Interesting read/logic about the "Jones to Avalanche" rumor:
Last Word on Baseball: NHL Rumours: Colorado Avalanche, Chicago Blackhawks, Minnesota Wild.
NHL Rumours: Colorado Avalanche, Chicago Blackhawks, Minnesota Wild
No question.Seth Jones has another 5-6+ years of good play in him, and right now is kind of buying low. If you’re a team that’s serious about winning and he is interested in playing here you’ve got to at least look at a deal
What rumors? It's been debunked alreadyNo question.
IF the rumours are true, you have to explore. A top pairing D under 30 who wants to be here. He’s also a pretty cheap cap hit for the upcoming year.
What rumors? It's been debunked already
The Friedman suggestion was also debunked?What rumors? It's been debunked already
What rumors? It's been debunked already
The Friedman suggestion was also debunked?
Interesting read/logic about the "Jones to Avalanche" rumor:
Last Word on Baseball: NHL Rumours: Colorado Avalanche, Chicago Blackhawks, Minnesota Wild.
NHL Rumours: Colorado Avalanche, Chicago Blackhawks, Minnesota Wild
I didn't renew my Athletic subscriptions so this is the first time I'm reading Baugh's take on Jones.
He thinks they should steer clear of him because being a 26 year old defenseman "would fly in the face of everything Joe Sakic has built" and he would "block one of the team’s other young defenders from playing a more prominent role."
None of this makes any sense. 26 years old is right in the wheelhouse of the Avs core and who is he worried about Jones blocking? 19 year old Justin Barron who will likely start in the AHL and could be there all season anyway?
This wasn't written by Baugh.
This wasn't written by Baugh.
Isn't this referring to what Baugh wrote directly below? There's a huge gap of space after this and before what looks to be where the Last Word On Sports writer gives his opinion.
"Rumour: The Athletic’s Peter Baugh recently had a mailbag where he evaluated Seth Jones‘ fit on the Avalanche roster.
Analysis: It is tempting to view the former fourth overall pick as the last piece of need, but Colorado should steer clear of Jones. That isn’t a knock on the Columbus Blue Jackets defender, but trading for a 26-year-old skater would fly in the face of everything Joe Sakic has built. Such a trade would block one of the team’s other young defenders from playing a more prominent role next year."
The "rumour" is from Baugh's mailbag, but the analysis is from the LWOS guy.
I really don't see how Saad makes less than 6 on the open market.So you're pinning us blowing leads on Andre Burakovsky, and that's it? Or should we be getting rid of Landeskog, too? Since he caused a goal against the same way Burakovsky did.
Who the hell is going to score beyond the top line if he's moved and we get a more defensive forward to take his place?
Brandon Saad will not make 6M per season, and I will personally fly you anywhere in the world 1st class if Tyson Jost even sniffs that dollar figure. The guy shouldn't even get a raise from his current contract, let alone that figure.
Anyone have a source for this Friedman quote? Been looking for a legit source for this rumor and can’t find one.
I really don't see how Saad makes less than 6 on the open market.
I pin blowing leads on Bura, Nemeth, Graves and G. Unlike the other 3, I believe G is worth keeping.
I don't blame Landeskog, no.Not Landeskog or Grubauer or Kadri or JB or Sakic much less the other players?