Speculation: 2020-21 LA Kings News/Roster/Rumors Discussion Part VI

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dealing for Eichel now is precisely the type of move DL was smart enough to avoid and precisely the type of move I fear Blake and Luc would go for. Maybe they're thinking that adding Eichel and a top #2 LD will move them instantly into Cup contention. But I really doubt that's the timeline they should be thinking about, sadly I could also see them thinking just that.
 
You might be disappointed,Blake has said their improving the team this off-season.Doubt this is going to carry over into next season.Propexts will probably used in trades.

I will be disappointed if they move a top prospect or 2 for a 29 year old with 1 year until he hits UFA. If they make a move for Eichel that doesn’t complete mortgage the future then I’d learn to live with it. Bernstein’s, Turcotte, Byfield and multiple picks is crazy to me.
 
The rebuild has gone pretty well so far.

A rebuild doesn't mean you start winning right away. They're supposed to be losing right now.

That doesn't mean Luc/Blake are above criticism, but the rebuild is on track where it should be.

It would be nice to see the 11th OA pick from 2017 being more of a force at this point but Lombardi didn't get high impacts from his first two first round picks--or his third first round pick for that matter--for years. Some would argue "ever" depending on your Trevor Lewis stance. Lombardi did well with his 4th 1st round pick, however. Blake's already had five.

It's on track in the sense that there are a lot of prospects and they are still not a playoff team. I'm just of the opinion that nobody should be okay with next season being like this season. That doesn't mean contender status but it does mean no more of this limp dick garbage.
 
I too think that the Kings should be trying to put a good team together for next year. With the cap space we have and the sheer volume of NHL ready prospects we have it's time to stop tanking.
 
It would be nice to see the 11th OA pick from 2017 being more of a force at this point but Lombardi didn't get high impacts from his first two first round picks--or his third first round pick for that matter--for years. Some would argue "ever" depending on your Trevor Lewis stance. Lombardi did well with his 4th 1st round pick, however. Blake's already had five.

It's on track in the sense that there are a lot of prospects and they are still not a playoff team. I'm just of the opinion that nobody should be okay with next season being like this season. That doesn't mean contender status but it does mean no more of this limp dick garbage.
Next year is the year for Vilardi and Andersson. If these guys are going to ever be good, then they're going to have to show something next season. They both have ample NHL experience under their belt, they're at prime physical ages, and they have an off season to prepare.

From next season on, we'll be having exciting rookies coming into the lineup every season for a while.

My concern is things getting stale. A losing environment. Losing begets losing, and that cycle has to be broken at some point. The culture is part of that.

I don't much care what their record is next year, but if things still feel stale, a shake up move might have to be made. Like a big trade, coaching change, or front office clean out.

Usually the GM that starts the rebuild isn't the one that finishes it.
 
Dealing for Eichel now is precisely the type of move DL was smart enough to avoid and precisely the type of move I fear Blake and Luc would go for. Maybe they're thinking that adding Eichel and a top #2 LD will move them instantly into Cup contention. But I really doubt that's the timeline they should be thinking about, sadly I could also see them thinking just that.

Dean Lombardi traded the pick they were going to use to draft Barzal, plus Jones and Miller for a declining rental winger he had 0 chance of signing.

I'm not Luc or Blake defender but unless Eichel's injury ends up being career ending there is almost zero chance that trade could ever be as awful as the Lucic trade. Even if Byfield turned into Barkov on the Sabres it still wouldn't be as big a disaster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: funky
Dean Lombardi traded the pick they were going to use to draft Barzal, plus Jones and Miller for a declining rental winger he had 0 chance of signing.

I'm not Luc or Blake defender but unless Eichel's injury ends up being career ending there is almost zero chance that trade could ever be as awful as the Lucic trade. Even if Byfield turned into Barkov on the Sabres it still wouldn't be as big a disaster.

Completely different situations. I don't see DL dealing for Eichel at this point in the building process.
 
Completely different situations. I don't see DL dealing for Eichel at this point in the building process.

I do, DL loved broken down players that wanted redemption. Nobody on this board wanted Justin Williams or Willie Mitchell but those two were integral parts to the cup runs being in the top 6 and Top 2-4 dman.
 
I do, DL loved broken down players that wanted redemption. Nobody on this board wanted Justin Williams or Willie Mitchell but those two were integral parts to the cup runs being in the top 6 and Top 2-4 dman.

I also think Dean would have been smart enough to realize.

"I am going to be paying two guys who are 30+ $66m for the next 3 years, maybe we should try and open the window a bit earlier"

It still blows my mind how many people are on board with a slow rebuild with Doughty and Kopitar's contract situations.
 
I do, DL loved broken down players that wanted redemption. Nobody on this board wanted Justin Williams or Willie Mitchell but those two were integral parts to the cup runs being in the top 6 and Top 2-4 dman.
That is not true. There were plenty of people around here who liked those moves.

But you could probably add Stoll to that list as well. He was a very good looking up and coming player who had a terrible concussion when he was with the Oilers.
 
I also think Dean would have been smart enough to realize.

"I am going to be paying two guys who are 30+ $66m for the next 3 years, maybe we should try and open the window a bit earlier"

It still blows my mind how many people are on board with a slow rebuild with Doughty and Kopitar's contract situations.


Why should we fast track it to get potentially 1 or 2 more runs out of them when they have shown they are inconsistent at best the past few years? They signed the retirement contracts that are tough to trade so they will go through a rebuild because it’s what is best long term. Trading them isn’t much of an option due to their contract and age.
 
Why should we fast track it to get potentially 1 or 2 more runs out of them when they have shown they are inconsistent at best the past few years? They signed the retirement contracts that are tough to trade so they will go through a rebuild because it’s what is best long term. Trading them isn’t much of an option due to their contract and age.
It's a salary cap argument imo. When you have a bunch of young cheap players about to come up, plus a bunch of cap space. Then we are wasting a window where we can be ultra competitive.

Having a number one dman and number one center already on the roster is just icing on the cake.
 
Part of the problem is no one is going to take a comparable offer from the Kings, its not only the taxes issue (Canada has huge taxes too), but who would want to come to the Kings, to play on a terrible team with 5-6 players who have permanent immunity from criticism because of what they did 9 and 7 years ago.

Its tough to realize this as fans of the team, but think about it, if you were an NHL player what has been appealing about playing on the Kings since the last cup?

The players revolted against the cup winning coach (who probably also deserves blame)

The previous cup-winning GM had perhaps the worst 3 year run as GM in team history from June 2014 to April 2017. Destroying a playoff team and making trades that to this day still have a massive negative effect on the franchise. It was so bad that despite winning 2 cups that person has not been able to get a GM job since.

The president hired a coach and GM not because of merit but because they were next man up (on an already sinking ship). Only the Kings fire a coach and GM for incompetence and then replace them with their #1 lieutenants.

They fired that coach, and then hired the most embarrassing coach in team history.

So that covers FA, now you may say make a trade. What did the Kings have to offer anyone since that cup team that was going to get an impact player here? Did you seen the Kings draft picks from 2012-2016? Who was trading an impact forward for what the Kings were offering? The only thing they could have done was trade the 2019 or 2020 1st rounders, and that would have been a negative thing.

It all should have been blown up in April 2017. They needed to go outside the organization for a GM and coach who weren't blinded by loyalty to these players. They should have traded one of the big two to send the message it was over and to prepare for the very difficult 3-5 year rebuild just as they did in 2006. Instead they tried to rebuild on the fly and it's been a complete and total disaster with the team not even sniffing the playoffs this season despite being gift wrapped a division with a bunch of awful teams. Had the Kings started the rebuild in 2017 they might have been a playoff team this year and at the very least would have a way better shot next season.

Face it guys, the 2014-2021 Kings have largely been the 1993-1999 Kings or 2002-2008 Kings. It's been that bad, we just have banners to look up at now and players still on the roster because of it.

Kopitar wasn't going anywhere by April 2017, so it would've had to be Doughty, and if he wanted to stay, they weren't going to force him out. I doubt there's a GM anywhere that would've gotten rid of him. Demitra was not Doughty either.

Dealing for Eichel now is precisely the type of move DL was smart enough to avoid and precisely the type of move I fear Blake and Luc would go for. Maybe they're thinking that adding Eichel and a top #2 LD will move them instantly into Cup contention. But I really doubt that's the timeline they should be thinking about, sadly I could also see them thinking just that.

Was he? How many UFAs were the Kings at least somewhat linked to in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010? There would've been some dumb contracts handed out if players were willing to come here. Those aren't trades, but I'm sure there must've been rumors back then. Were the Kings ready for the Richards deal? Not really. Hell we killed DL trading Purcell for Halpern.

Had Gagne not gotten hurt, Carter probably isn't here. Had Penner been able to score, the whole reason DL brought him in for, maybe there's less of a need for Carter.

We can look back at the bigger picture and say DL weaved a tapestry. There's plenty that had he done, that picture might look different.
 
I also think Dean would have been smart enough to realize.

"I am going to be paying two guys who are 30+ $66m for the next 3 years, maybe we should try and open the window a bit earlier"

It still blows my mind how many people are on board with a slow rebuild with Doughty and Kopitar's contract situations.

It kind of comes down to what is considered "slow", right? To me, expecting playoffs in Year 3 of basically a total rebuild (this past season is Year 3 for this argument) is silly since that is a retool and not a burn-it down rebuild. That's where it is okay to say things are "on-track" timeline wise; however, this off-season is where the two camps start to split.

For me, a rebuild doesn't mean you simply add placeholders ad nauseum while sucking and acquiring prospects until all of the prospects are good and then you add to them but rather you use your assets wisely during the rebuild to add long-term pieces that help you become a contender. That means that Blake needs to identify and add players this offseason that offer something to the long-term plan with that something not being making sure the Kings draft in the lottery again. It doesn't mean trade every high-end prospect to try and be "all-in" starting next season but it means that the time has come for some proven talent to be added so the process of starting to win can take shape.

With the way this team plays, they should give Foligno a one-year $8MM contract if he'd take it just for the culture impact. I say that mostly tongue-in-cheek but this is the kind of guy this team needs on the culture front. Why would he want to come here though unless the Kings overpaid with dollars, term or both? Turns 34 at the end of October so he wheels could fall off real soon but I'd overpay dollar wise if they keep the term to two years or less.
 
I also think Dean would have been smart enough to realize.

"I am going to be paying two guys who are 30+ $66m for the next 3 years, maybe we should try and open the window a bit earlier"

It still blows my mind how many people are on board with a slow rebuild with Doughty and Kopitar's contract situations.

I don’t see Kopitar and Eichel being teammates on a Kings team. Blake and Luc aren’t going to be able to resist a 24-25 year old that is a proven ppg player when as you’ve noted scoring is the number one issue plaguing this franchise for years.

I just don’t see a Eichel/Kopitar/Byfield lineup under any circumstances because if Blake is as high on Byfield as reports indicate where he’s off the table for anyone (save Gretzky) then you really run the risk of having a 10 million dollar center being demoted to the third line and a captain being demoted from first to third doesn’t look good for the team.

Bottom line is, if your going after Eichel and keeping Byfield, you need to jettison Kopitar because you aren’t paying 10 million for a third liner. You have to bite the bullet, retain salary and recoup what you can in terms of assets.
 
Why should we fast track it to get potentially 1 or 2 more runs out of them when they have shown they are inconsistent at best the past few years? They signed the retirement contracts that are tough to trade so they will go through a rebuild because it’s what is best long term. Trading them isn’t much of an option due to their contract and age.

Because the ownership is paying them $22m a year. You think at some point an AEG bean counter isn't going to finally say "What the hell is going on?"

If they trade for Eichel this summer and add a d-man and winger, all of which are possible and based on the outlook of the Pacific next season the Kings window opens next season. They have Kopitar for 3 more, Doughty for 6 more and Eichel for 5 more.

And it's not as if they are trading every one of their young players. There will still be plenty of prospects left in the system.

I'd prefer it to be built around a combo of people not named Byfield. But even if Blake deals Byfield, Turcotte and the Kings 1st this year as Bernstein hinted. (not saying I believe that, but that is probably the worst case scenario as far as what would be traded)

Kempe - Eichel - FA
Iafallo - Kopitar - Kaliyev
AA - Vilardi - Brown
Moore- JAD - Kupari

Extra: Lemieux, Lizotte

Bjornfot - Doughty
FA - Roy
Anderson - Walker

Peterson
Quick


That is a playoff team in the Pacific next season, it's a good lineup and it still has upside to get better. By 2022-2023 the Kings would probably be at a position where they could challenge Vegas.

If this were the Kings 4 centers next season they would have the best position group in the league, IMO.
 
Last edited:
Because the ownership is paying them $22m a year. You think at some point an AEG bean counter isn't going to finally say "What the hell is going on?"

If they trade for Eichel this summer and add a d-man and winger, all of which are possible and based on the outlook of the Pacific next season the Kings window opens next season. They have Kopitar for 3 more, Doughty for 6 more and Eichel for 5 more.

And it's not as if they are trading every one of their young players. There will still be plenty of prospects left in the system.

I'd prefer it to be built around a combo of people not named Byfield. But even if Blake deals Byfield, Turcotte and the Kings 1st this year as Bernstein hinted. (not saying I believe that, but that is probably the worst case scenario as far as what would be traded)

Kempe - Eichel - FA
Iafallo - Kopitar - Kaliyev
AA - Vilardi - Brown
Moore- JAD - Kupari

Extra: Lemieux, Lizotte

Bjornfot - Doughty
FA - Roy
Anderson - Walker

Peterson
Quick


That is a playoff team in the Pacific next season, it's a good lineup and it still has upside to get better. By 2022-2023 the Kings would probably be at a position where they could challenge Vegas.

If this were the Kings 4 centers next season they would have the best position group in the league, IMO.

I was on board the Eichel train earlier this season since he is elite and it would allow for Kopitar to have his minutes reduced which I think would allow him to thrive and the Kings would have two scoring lines. I can still stomach an Eichel trade but that suggested Byfield/Turcotte/1st offer seems pretty insane and means you are all-in while still needing to fill those FA holes you have above...those holes are RW1 and D3 which aren't cheap to fill via free agency.

If they could pry Reinhart away while keeping Byfield/Turcotte/Kaliyev, I'd be way more interested in that play at this point in time. Getting Hamilton also sounds nice but he's 28 in June and will probably be looking for a lot of term. RH shot as well but whatever.

Kempe-Kopitar-Reinhart
Iafallo-Byfield-Kaliyev
AA/Moore-Vilardi-Andersson
AA/Moore-JAD-Brown

Doughty/Hamilton/Bjornfot/Roy/Anderson/Walker

I'm not married to these lines or anything but it feels like the Kings could potentially ice two scoring lines if you are able to put a goal scorer with Kopitar while also being able to stick Iafallo with one of the young centers in Byfield/Vilardi. Maybe Vilardi has to go in the Reinhart deal but Turcotte is here eventually.

Could Reinhart and Hamilton be had for $14-15MM v. Eichel's $10MM while keeping two of Byfield/Turcotte/Vilardi? Is that a better use of assets and cap?
 
  • Like
Reactions: funky
Because the ownership is paying them $22m a year. You think at some point an AEG bean counter isn't going to finally say "What the hell is going on?"

If they trade for Eichel this summer and add a d-man and winger, all of which are possible and based on the outlook of the Pacific next season the Kings window opens next season. They have Kopitar for 3 more, Doughty for 6 more and Eichel for 5 more.

And it's not as if they are trading every one of their young players. There will still be plenty of prospects left in the system.

I'd prefer it to be built around a combo of people not named Byfield. But even if Blake deals Byfield, Turcotte and the Kings 1st this year as Bernstein hinted. (not saying I believe that, but that is probably the worst case scenario as far as what would be traded)

Kempe - Eichel - FA
Iafallo - Kopitar - Kaliyev
AA - Vilardi - Brown
Moore- JAD - Kupari

Extra: Lemieux, Lizotte

Bjornfot - Doughty
FA - Roy
Anderson - Walker

Peterson
Quick


That is a playoff team in the Pacific next season, it's a good lineup and it still has upside to get better. By 2022-2023 the Kings would probably be at a position where they could challenge Vegas.

If this were the Kings 4 centers next season they would have the best position group in the league, IMO.
That lineup has little to no cap space. I don't think counting on a guy recovering from neck surgery to be 1c is the way to make the playoffs. Byfield could be the better player next season if Eichel has any issues recovering.
 
Byfield + Turcotte + 1st for Eichel would set this organization back another decade.

It's a great move if all you want is mediocrity for a few years.

I am in the pro-Eichel trade (assuming he gets medically cleared). However, the above price is way to steep. So I would decline and keep what we have. I think Byfield is off the table. I would consider Turcotte+1st+Walker/Clague or another add. That is basically as far as I would go. Anything more (including Byfield) will really hurt our rebuild. Adding Eichel only without the appropriate prospects will only make us a bubble team.
 
I also think Dean would have been smart enough to realize.

"I am going to be paying two guys who are 30+ $66m for the next 3 years, maybe we should try and open the window a bit earlier"

It still blows my mind how many people are on board with a slow rebuild with Doughty and Kopitar's contract situations.

Gotta say Herby...you get it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad