BeardyCanuck03
@BeardyCanuck03
What’s stupid about moving to the 6th pick from 10th?
The Canucks are low on assets. If the trade up nets the Canucks Byram, I think it'll be a good move, but I doubt he'll be available at 6.
What’s stupid about moving to the 6th pick from 10th?
Lucic+Pulijujarvi for LE
Who says no
Good luck with this idea of moving up, especially with Detroit! They are rebuilding too so why on earth would they move back? Also, we don’t have the assets that most would covet to move up onto that 4-7 spot.
The Canucks are low on assets. If the trade up nets the Canucks Byram, I think it'll be a good move, but I doubt he'll be available at 6.
I get the concept... was more meaning that we don’t have coveted assets they would want. Our 4Oth wouldn’t be enough. Especially if they too have their eyes set on possibly zegras or Dach, etc.To gain extra assets? That's kind of the basis of re-building. If Detroit has a bunch of guys they all deem to be of the same value, then moving back and picking up extra assets is exactly something they would look at doing. Really it all depends on who the Canucks would be targeting.
There are always assets that you can move, whether it’s the right move or not is another discussionI get the concept... was more meaning that we don’t have coveted assets they would want. Our 4Oth wouldn’t be enough. Especially if they too have their eyes set on possibly zegras or Dach, etc.
there isn’t a trade with Detroit I’d make for 6th as Byram isn’t going to be available there. It’s 4th overall or bust for Byram. The Avs should be the only target. Only a pure idiot like Dim would target a team too far down the list to actually get the player, then makes the trade and picks someone like tiny Zegras!The Canucks are low on assets. If the trade up nets the Canucks Byram, I think it'll be a good move, but I doubt he'll be available at 6.
I personally just don’t see this happening.There are always assets that you can move, whether it’s the right move or not is another discussion
I get the concept... was more meaning that we don’t have coveted assets they would want. Our 4Oth wouldn’t be enough. Especially if they too have their eyes set on possibly zegras or Dach, etc.
there isn’t a trade with Detroit I’d make for 6th as Byram isn’t going to be available there. It’s 4th overall or bust for Byram. The Avs should be the only target. Only a pure idiot like Dim would target a team too far down the list to actually get the player, then makes the trade and picks someone like tiny Zegras!
Literally everyone should say no. That would be one of the worst trades in franchise history and a fireable offense by itself.
I dont know how you could put a value on this player.?..(pedigree I guess ?).. taken 4thOA..Hip surgeries..hasnt demonstrated much at the NHL level.Literally everyone should say no. That would be one of the worst trades in franchise history and a fireable offense by itself.
I dont think its a big deal criticising the vagueness of a rumor like that. We have heard for months that the Canucks would love to move up and take Hughes or Byram. At least have a team or Gm or something we can sink our teeth into. 6 seems odd to me also.......whateverBoy, the blase way some people react to rumours in this thread makes you wonder why they waste their time here. If "stuff is obviously happening d'uh what GM wouldn't be exploring", then what is the appeal of this thread? Just killing time?
And I’m saying if they are targeting anyone but Byram they’d be fools!Well, the trade wouldn't be made unless the targeted player is available, that's a given.
And I’m saying if they are targeting anyone but Byram they’d be fools!
I dont know how you could put a value on this player.?..(pedigree I guess ?).. taken 4thOA..Hip surgeries..hasnt demonstrated much at the NHL level.
If Byram is available at 6 it’s because Chicago and Colorado have made HUGE mistakesIf Byram is somehow available, I doubt Detroit would be willing to move down.
Good to look at it. Seems like Bennng is turning every stone and its hilarious that people are taking such a negative attitude towards that. Do your job.....you never know when a GM coughs up a gem.
Would be a little suprised the Hawks would pass on Byram....Colorado and LA i could see as they need Cs in the worst way.
Would be shocked if Detroit moved on from that opportunity. Doesnt hurt to try
At 6? I’d fire Dim instantly! At 10 if the rest of the league goes forward heavy inside the Top10 I can at least understand. But inside the Top10 is a big no for meMy fear is that it's Broberg they'd be targeting.
A savvy GM and owner would get together and offer Tryamkin a contract with a big enough signing bonus to buy himself out of his final year of his contract in Russia and he here for September. Too bad we have neither of thosewhen is this suppose to happen?
I dont think its a big deal criticising the vagueness of a rumor like that. We have heard for months that the Canucks would love to move up and take Hughes or Byram. At least have a team or Gm or something we can sink our teeth into. 6 seems odd to me also.......whatever