2019 Off-Season Non-Management Thread - Canucks/Boeser talking 4-5 years, $7m AAV - Kypreos)
- Thread starter ProstheticConscience
- Start date
- Status
Billy Kvcmu
Registered User
Yes, but that’s a common scene for talented RFA these days. Young players are realizing that they have more power than they thought and that loyalty means nothing in pro sports
polarbearcub
Registered User
And for edler , if he went to Seattle , he Won’t have to uproot his family .
Billy Kvcmu
Registered User
Well then, see what you can do with him this season and if you’re doing well, maybe he stays.
Melvin
21/12/05
A 4 year deal to Boeser would literally be the dumbest thing you could possibly do.
I am toxic
. . . even in small doses
Agreed, pay the extra million a year and get 6-7 years. Jimmy Hayes a one time 20 goal scorer just got $7m for his UFA years, in 4 years Brock's UFA years could cost upwards of $12m.
krutovsdonut
eeyore
- Sep 25, 2016
- 17,592
- 10,339
or maybe we put a plan b trade in place with buffalo for scandella and then we laid that out to him on the basis we needed to pull the trigger on it now in the event he was bound and determined to stick to his guns.
you never know.
Blue and Green
Out to lunch
- Dec 17, 2017
- 3,983
- 4,188
Lucic and Zaitsev have contracts that are too long to take as cap dumps. I'd want salary retention as part of any trade to take Zaitsev and of course the Leafs want to free as much cap space as possible so I don't know whether or not there's a sensible deal to be made there.
Marleau wants to return to San Jose; Canucks could be the middle man. Clarkson gives the Canucks a way to get at Miller. One year of Clarkson and/or one year of 50% retention on Marleau is the way to go, rather than taking on $22.5M-$24M contracts.
Sure I just imagine the price would be too steep considering he put up 70 points. No harm checking in
krutovsdonut
eeyore
- Sep 25, 2016
- 17,592
- 10,339
i do not agree there is nothing wrong with it, but i guess i can live with it if there is no ntc when compared to market alternatives.
i honestly doubt we get three good seasons out of edler, but i guess we can buy him out.
Jack Burton
Pro Tank Since 13
No worries Donny but as you get older than you'll come to realize that JB and this organization as a whole don't do a lot of things that make sense.
Billy Kvcmu
Registered User
I can live with it as long as it’s under 4 years with no NMC, perhaps anything under 7m cap hit
Melvin
21/12/05
Like, you give Brock two years or you give him eight, but almost nothing in between makes any sense. Why would you sign a long term deal that doesn't buy out any UFA years?
polarbearcub
Registered User
We'll likely end up in a Trouba situation if that's the case. We've seen how poorly bridging young talent works out, especially when there's a built in mechanism if things go really pear shaped (buyout rate is only 1/3rd if they are 26 or younger).
It's gotta be 6 or 7 years, otherwise our future window will close in a hurry.
m9
m9
- Jan 23, 2010
- 25,107
- 15,230
Cautiously optimistic with the names floated around today.
Hoffman has his issues but chances are Florida will need to dump that contract if they get Panarin so the cost will be low. Only one year left on his contract so it's low-risk and I much prefer that to a long UFA with a lesser player.
Edler for a 2 year overpriced deal or a 3 year deal at a reasonable rate with the last year not having a NMC is fine with me.
The Tanev stuff only really makes sense if they have something else in place for a RHD, so we'll see what happens there.
At this point I would be very surprised if Toronto & Vancouver don't make a trade between now and early July. There is way too much smoke and too many pieces on both sides that make sense. Combine that with the transactions between the teams in the last couple of years and I would be shocked if something doesn't happen.
Hoffman has his issues but chances are Florida will need to dump that contract if they get Panarin so the cost will be low. Only one year left on his contract so it's low-risk and I much prefer that to a long UFA with a lesser player.
Edler for a 2 year overpriced deal or a 3 year deal at a reasonable rate with the last year not having a NMC is fine with me.
The Tanev stuff only really makes sense if they have something else in place for a RHD, so we'll see what happens there.
At this point I would be very surprised if Toronto & Vancouver don't make a trade between now and early July. There is way too much smoke and too many pieces on both sides that make sense. Combine that with the transactions between the teams in the last couple of years and I would be shocked if something doesn't happen.
Hit the post
I have your gold medal Zippy!
Can’t possibly happen as that would set a new standard (as low a benchmark as that is) for crap if he’s dealt for Loui E.
TruGr1t
Proper Villain
- Jun 26, 2003
- 24,744
- 9,423
Everyone is caught up on the Edler stuff, but yeah, that rumored Boeser contract is really stupid.
This is the same man who thinks signing big players who are bad will make his team less injury prone
Bankerguy
Registered User
- Apr 28, 2013
- 3,963
- 2,186
I want Boeser on a 7 year deal. 7.5MM per.
that takes him to 29 years old which is good.
Also, i'd rather give a guy like Ferland 5MM as opposed to taking Lucic if its toughness that we need.
Ferland can skate and hit and put up points. He's actually useful.
that takes him to 29 years old which is good.
Also, i'd rather give a guy like Ferland 5MM as opposed to taking Lucic if its toughness that we need.
Ferland can skate and hit and put up points. He's actually useful.
polarbearcub
Registered User
- Status
Ad
Latest posts
-
Buffalo Bills Week 11-- Kansas City (9-0) @ Buffalo (8-2) Sunday 11/17, 4:25 PM, CBS- Latest: sabresfan129103
-
-
-
