2019 Off-Season Non-Management Thread - Canucks/Boeser talking 4-5 years, $7m AAV - Kypreos)

[krutovsdonut]

And their 3rd RHD is Travis Sanheim. They are set (unless the Canucks are getting Sanheim).

That being said, a bigger deal makes more sense to me. I doubt Benning would trade Tanev for just picks.

i doubt he would trade tanev unless he had a guy stepping into that role. there is no right side depth.

 

[Bettman Returnz]

i doubt he would trade tanev unless he had a guy stepping into that role. there is no right side depth.

Would have to think, yeah. Either tanev is included in a bigger deal or it’s a trickle down trade (after another one is made or he signs a UFA).

 

[Billy Kvcmu]

Oh I think it's highly unlikely but do you trust JB and Aquaman?

I know I sure don't.

Here's one for ya....what if Kakko goes 1st overall? Think JB calls up the NYR to kick some tires?
Given the Ranger situation and what their trying to do, I think they would definitely think about a Horvat, unprotected 1st, +,+and + package for 2nd overall.

In case your unaware, JB is shopping hard and looking for that "Big Splash"

Big splash on the defense

 

[PG Canuck]

Big splash on the defense

That would be the Luke Schenn extension.

 

[DonnyNucker]

Friedman on a morning hit linking the Canucks go mike Hoffman

This makes no sense

 

[4Twenty]

And their 3rd RHD is Travis Sanheim. They are set (unless the Canucks are getting Sanheim).

That being said, a bigger deal makes more sense to me. I doubt Benning would trade Tanev for just picks.

Sanheim is a lefty, he's the guy making Ghost expendable.

 

[Mr. Canucklehead]

Things move fast.

 

[BenningHurtsMySoul]

Horvat/Juolevi/10th to NYR for 2nd pick (Hughes)

 

[DonnyNucker]

Things move fast.

He better not cave. No NMC and MAX 3 years. I’ll be pissed if it’s over 2

 

[Josepho]

Hoffman would've been a really good player to target last year but his price has most certainly skyrocketed since then.

I for one am floored that Jim Benning wasn't proactive about a transaction.

 

[TruGr1t]

Things move fast.

This absolutely involves the Canucks capitulating on term. There's no reason for Edler to alter his demands at this stage of the process. I'm assuming they've began to realize they won't be able to re-imagine the entire bloody blue line in a single off season.

 

[Mr. Canucklehead]

He better not cave. No NMC and MAX 3 years. I’ll be pissed if it’s over 2

I’m more concerned about term than NMC, but I hope it’s not more than 3 years. 4 is the max I would do before being upset. But again, no NMC, and ideally, a limited NTC.

 

[Mr. Canucklehead]

Some Boeser news from Kypreos:



That would be great value compared to some the asinine things happening around the league right now.

 

[sting101]

He better not cave. No NMC and MAX 3 years. I’ll be pissed if it’s over 2

prepare to be pissed.

there is no way Edler wont get more years with the way things are going with these UFAs. just get the Seattle protection and keep it to 3 and i will call it a success

 

[Burke's Evil Spirit]

If the sequence of events is:
- Canucks offer Edler 2-year deal, he says no
- Canucks explore trade market, don't find anything they like.
- Canucks extend Edler offer to 3 years, he accents.

I'm okay with that, as long as the 3rd year doesn't have a NMC.

 

[Hemty]

Wth is happening. All these reports suggest we'll trade or sign almost everyone, jesus.

 

[FroshaugFan2]

Some Boeser news from Kypreos:



That would be great value compared to some the asinine things happening around the league right now.

A five year deal would take Boeser right to unrestricted free agency, correct?

 

[Mr. Canucklehead]

A five year deal would take Boeser right to unrestricted free agency, correct?

I believe so, yes.

 

[DonnyNucker]

I’m more concerned about term than NMC, but I hope it’s not more than 3 years. 4 is the max I would do before being upset. But again, no NMC, and ideally, a limited NTC.

I’ll burn my Malholtra jersey if we give a broken old man 4 years. Apologies to Malhotra

 

[Hollywood Burrows]

Wth is happening. All these reports suggest we'll trade or sign almost everyone, jesus.

jim thirsty af

 

[MS]

This absolutely involves the Canucks capitulating on term. There's no reason for Edler to alter his demands at this stage of the process. I'm assuming they've began to realize they won't be able to re-imagine the entire bloody blue line in a single off season.

You would think ... although it was interesting to learn yesterday that his agent is a really small-time guy with few clients who might not exactly be Scott Boras in these situations.

But yeah, there's absolutely no reason for Edler to cave on his demands only a few days before he'd be able to talk with other teams and use that as leverage, and after the UFA market has gone through the roof with the Hayes and Karlsson signings. Would be a really stupid move. So odds are that Benning is panicking after moves he wanted to make aren't coming to fruition.

 

[polarbearcub]

5x7 sounds perfect to me.

As for edler .. I can can handle 3 years if there’s no nmc

 

[DonnyNucker]

Wth is happening. All these reports suggest we'll trade or sign almost everyone, jesus.

A five year deal would take Boeser right to unrestricted free agency, correct?

Hmmm that would be strange. I’d prefer to buy a few UFA years. Unless the figure is way lower than expected

 

[Billy Kvcmu]

This makes no sense

Be used this team doesn’t need anymore talented LW...oh wait, we do

 

[BeardyCanuck03]

If the sequence of events is:
- Canucks offer Edler 2-year deal, he says no
- Canucks explore trade market, don't find anything they like.
- Canucks extend Edler offer to 3 years, he accents.

I'm okay with that, as long as the 3rd year doesn't have a NMC.

Rumours have been that Edler is okay with being exposed in the Expansion Draft. My guess is 3 years with a NTC. As long as it's structured correctly, there is nothing wrong with going that 3rd year