North
Registered User
- Jun 25, 2009
- 16,150
- 14,266
As long as we don't reach we get someone good
I actually have faith that Gretzky won’t go walkabout.
As long as we don't reach we get someone good
You mean same tier as McDavid.
Ekblad was just that good and is still on the same tier as Draisaitl
Why would they offer that? That's a massive cap hit acquisition to jump a few picks up the draft.Posted it on the GDT
I'm not a huge fan of trading down but if Vancouver offers 2019 first for Lucic and our first, that's a deal I might consider.
Zegras passing is sick. I wouldn't mind him at 8 TBH
I'd be looking hard at trading up to secure Dach or Byram. If we added our 2nd, how many spots could we jump up? 2? 3?
Are there teams this year, like Montreal and Arizona in 2018, ahead of us that are dead set on picking for positional need?
That would be very good for us.L.A. needs a dynamic forward in the worst way, the Wings need a top Dman in the worst way so I could see the Wings reaching for one of the Swedish D or York if Byram is off the board.
I'd be looking hard at trading up to secure Dach or Byram. If we added our 2nd, how many spots could we jump up? 2? 3?
Yep. We aren't in dire straits either. A couple good moves and we are back in it.I think if you trade the pick for a player. You would probably have to protect that player and may have to leave a roster player vulnerable at the expansion draft you don't want to lose.
Keep the picks because they are expansion draft protected.
After the expansion draft is over, That should be the time to trade a 1st rounder for an impact player. By then, our team should be pretty solid if built correctly.
Definitely keep the 8th overall.
Oh.I think if you trade the pick for a player. You would probably have to protect that player and may have to leave a roster player vulnerable at the expansion draft you don't want to lose.
Keep the picks because they are expansion draft protected.
After the expansion draft is over, That should be the time to trade a 1st rounder for an impact player. By then, our team should be pretty solid if built correctly.
Definitely keep the 8th overall.
Let's just trade everyone away cause there is no way we can build correctly. Why try?
Cause that's what I'm saying.Let's just trade everyone away cause there is no way we can build correctly. Why try?
That would be very good for us.
You wonder if the pick gets traded with someone like Russell for a roster player.
You could dream Lucic.
We should trade the pick right now to fix the team but we can't build the team right anyways. So like...we are damned if we so damned if we don't. At least that's what it feels like you are saying.Cause that's what I'm saying.
That's a really good point. The Schneider trade even backfired.When has that ever worked out. I'm serious when has a team traded their pick and prospect for a pro player and looked back and thought. God damn that was a good trade.
It must happen once in awhile.. but I don't recall.
I do know every time we've traded our 1st... we've gotten taken to the cleaners.
Broberg would be their pick. They like big swede Dman and haven't had any great ones since the departure of Lidstrom. Broberg will be their next Lidstrom.L.A. needs a dynamic forward in the worst way, the Wings need a top Dman in the worst way so I could see the Wings reaching for one of the Swedish D or York if Byram is off the board.
That's very different than, "let's just trade everyone away," no?We should trade the pick right now to fix the team but we can't build the team right anyways. So like...we are damned if we so damned if we don't. At least that's what it feels like you are saying.
Most ifs are big ifs in hockey.That's very different than, "let's just trade everyone away," no?
What I'm saying in that post is that the "if" is a big "if".
Okay?Most ifs are big ifs in hockey.