Hamonic to the Flames.
Saw that they wanted more than what they got from an Eastern conference team. Don't see SY parting with more than a 1st and 2 2nds.
Assuming Calgary's prospect pool is strong, it's probably a good deal for both sides.
I think our management just slightly over-values draft picks. I don't think we should be spending them all willy nilly or anything, but if we'd paid that price for Hamonic, it wouldn't have been the end of the world.
Assuming Calgary's prospect pool is strong, it's probably a good deal for both sides.
I think our management just slightly over-values draft picks. I don't think we should be spending them all willy nilly or anything, but if we'd paid that price for Hamonic, it wouldn't have been the end of the world.
Yzerman likes to restock the prospect pool yearly. I don't necessarily disagree with you but Yzerman doesn't like getting rid of his precious picks. Hamonic is good but he hasn't played great lately. I don't see Yzerman giving up picks unless it's something where he thinks he's getting a sure thing.
A couple of things:
1 - I don't think we'd get that price. Snow supposedly did not want to trade him in the East, so price would have been higher.
2 - Calgary has a much better chance of re-signing him after his contract is up than we do, so they're not getting a few years of Hamonic - they may be getting 5-8. Makes the payment a lot easier to swallow than if we're just getting him as basically a long-term rental.
Yzerman likes to restock the prospect pool yearly. I don't necessarily disagree with you but Yzerman doesn't like getting rid of his precious picks. Hamonic is good but he hasn't played great lately. I don't see Yzerman giving up picks unless it's something where he thinks he's getting a sure thing.
Like Lindback.
Yea the exception. That's a time where we were desperate for a goalie. We're not desperate for Hamonic.
I'd rather not bring Boyle back now. I'd rather use that spot to break in a young C.
Yeah, I just think there's a certain point where that mindset comes at the expense of the team currently on the ice. I'm not even saying we should have brought in Hamonic. (I was lukewarm on Hamonic.) I just mean, in general, there's a point where hoarding prospects comes at a price. It's hard to say if we cross that line occasionally, because you never know what's going on in GM to GM conversations.
Yzerman also sold every thing at that deadline he had tons of teams draft picks
This is my opinion on why Yzerman does this. I think he finds the prospects are more valuable than the picks. If we develop a lot of good players and have an abundance of them it gives us an advantage in not only a cap place but also from a trade standpoint. Now you have to actually draft well and have to develop them well but if you do then this is what can happen.
Now despite everyone thinking that our window is small I think it's actually pretty good but I actually think this season has the most uncertainty we have had in quite a while. That doesn't mean I don't think our team will be good. I think they can be very good but after the season we had, the Stamkos and Johnson injuries, trading away Drouin I couldn't tell you what I think about this current team. I personally wouldn't sell much to make this current team better because of that uncertainty.
We have a lot of talent coming in the next few seasons. I think our best years to win are in the few years after this one. Again that doesn't mean that this one won't be good and won't be our best chance to. I'm just not one to go all in on this year. Think it's not our best year to do it. Now if we have a good offseason and get some players without having to give up futures and also play well in the first half of the season limiting injuries, we could sell futures at the deadline because a lot of that uncertainty is gone for now.
I realize that there's more uncertainty in the future but when there's uncertainty now and the future looks promising I don't think that you want to risk long term future for a uncertain short term future. I really think Yzerman is all about building an overall valuable team. Current and future. There's a time to go all in. I'm not so sure now is that time.
DAN GIRARDI ? i'd take a flyer on him I think he will be cheap a good bottom pair defenseman! we need a vet with so many kids coming in.
I don't even really believe in going "all in." Seems to backfire a whole lot more than it works.
I just mean, yeah, we value picks/prospects a lot... but there's a Phase 2 to that plan that we don't really seem to execute on. We're rarely, if ever, trading those prospects to fill a current team need. In the case of both Drouin and DeAngelo, we traded them for yet more prospects/picks.
DAN GIRARDI ? i'd take a flyer on him I think he will be cheap a good bottom pair defenseman! we need a vet with so many kids coming in.
I don't even really believe in going "all in." Seems to backfire a whole lot more than it works.
I just mean, yeah, we value picks/prospects a lot... but there's a Phase 2 to that plan that we don't really seem to execute on. We're rarely, if ever, trading those prospects to fill a current team need. In the case of both Drouin and DeAngelo, we traded them for yet more prospects/picks.
Hrmmm yes, I will take one (1) player that was bought out last season by a defensively poorly stocked team plz.
Are you talking for Syracuse? Where do we have many kids coming in on the main roster?