2016 Draft Thread | 7

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Status
Not open for further replies.
If the worst case scenario happens and we end up at the 6th pick and Tkachuk and Dubois are gone, who do you guys want to take, Keller? Jost? One of the d?

Keller. He fits perfectly with this group. We've got some real good shooters now we just need a guy with elite vision and playmaking ability to find Boeser, Virtanen, McCann and Horvat in prime scoring locations. Watch the highlights of the USA vs Czech quarterfinals on YouTube. He's always making plays happen. So explosive and creative. He's a huge lift to the group. Will instantly raise the game of whoever he plays with.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8sCtNKMoteU

#19 and he's basically in every clip
 
Oh gosh I hope we don't number 6.


Let's all mentally put our faith into believing the Canucks will win the number 1 pick. I think if all nucks fans do it, I believer we will win it.
 
Oh gosh I hope we don't number 6.


Let's all mentally put our faith into believing the Canucks will win the number 1 pick. I think if all nucks fans do it, I believer we will win it.

What's wrong with the 6th pick?

It's what I'm expecting us to get. That way if we get better it'll be gravy.

Besides there are still really solid players available @ 6.

The 4-10 picks are all on the same tier IMO.
 
Who do you see as Beans comparables? I haven't seen much of him, other than that he seems a little slow. Like a Mike Green type?

I find it odd that I keep hearing people knock his skating.... There's no issue with it, he's a solid skater with good speed, anyone who has said he's slow hasn't watched much of him. Kid gets pretty underrated around here, I think he's right there with the best of the D man in this draft. Bean also gets knocked on for his defensive game which is pretty good for such an offensive weapon. He'll be like a Sanheim pick, after he's drafted people will wonder why he went later. I think after next season Beans stocks will sky rocket, and I wouldn't be surprised if people start to think of him as a potential top pairing D man, just my two cents. I really like Bean and he'll fix our future PP issues from the back end.
 
What's wrong with the 6th pick?

It's what I'm expecting us to get. That way if we get better it'll be gravy.

Besides there are still really solid players available @ 6.

The 4-10 picks are all on the same tier IMO.

6 is scary for me because I'm afraid Benning will take a defenceman.

If we get 6 I would really want to trade down, trade down to like 9-12 + asset and pick bean/jost/Fabbro
 
I find it odd that I keep hearing people knock his skating.... There's no issue with it, he's a solid skater with good speed, anyone who has said he's slow hasn't watched much of him. Kid gets pretty underrated around here, I think he's right there with the best of the D man in this draft. Bean also gets knocked on for his defensive game which is pretty good for such an offensive weapon. He'll be like a Sanheim pick, after he's drafted people will wonder why he went later. I think after next season Beans stocks will sky rocket, and I wouldn't be surprised if people start to think of him as a potential top pairing D man, just my two cents. I really like Bean and he'll fix our future PP issues from the back end.

To be fair Sanheim still isn't very good of a defender...

Bean needs to make improvements to his overall quickness if he's going to be an NHL PP QB. He can get there but there's still a question of whether he can develop. The goals he scored this year in junior will be hard to come by at higher levels IMO. That's not even mentioning his defensive game and strength. I don't deny there's upside but there are also plenty of question marks that people are overlooking. At international tournaments and the TPG he hasn't looked like much of an offensive weapon with less time and space, same thing in the WHL playoffs.
 
6 is scary for me because I'm afraid Benning will take a defenceman.

If we get 6 I would really want to trade down, trade down to like 9-12 + asset and pick bean/jost/Fabbro

Benning has been pretty open so far in his interviews that he is absolutely willing to trade down.

Which I think is a good idea, Bean + > Consensus 6th overall pick
 
To be fair Sanheim still isn't very good of a defender...

Bean needs to make improvements to his overall quickness if he's going to be an NHL PP QB. He can get there but there's still a question of whether he can develop. The goals he's scoring in junior will be hard to come by at higher levels IMO. That's not even mentioning his defensive game and strength. I don't deny there's upside but there are also plenty of question marks that people are overlooking. At international tournaments and the TPG he hasn't looked like much of an offensive weapon with less time and space, same thing in the WHL playoffs.

Bean and Sanheim were used as a shutdown pairing because Kanzig (their usual shutdown defensemen) was just too slow to handle DeBrusk & Spacek. So Bean wasn't really being utilized offensively.

Also, I have absolutely no problem with the goals that Bean scores. They are quick, accurate shots or smart plays to fake out defenders. Bean loves the short side above the shoulder spot for his wristers. It's not like those goals are necessarily "junior hockey goals". In fact I'd argue that they are very much NHL goals.
 
Bean's wrist shot really stands out.

He seems to be able to pick corners from mid-range.

Arguably the best D purely from an offensive stand point in the o-zone.

However his overall game imo is lacking.

D are so hard to project.

I prefer Canucks stick with a forward. If Canucks trade down I rather we pick the Jost, Keller type forwards.
 
Keller. He fits perfectly with this group. We've got some real good shooters now we just need a guy with elite vision and playmaking ability to find Boeser, Virtanen, McCann and Horvat in prime scoring locations. Watch the highlights of the USA vs Czech quarterfinals on YouTube. He's always making plays happen. So explosive and creative. He's a huge lift to the group. Will instantly raise the game of whoever he plays with.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8sCtNKMoteU

#19 and he's basically in every clip

Agree with all of this. Wouldn't even mind picking him at 4 or 5.

After the top 3, I'd want one of Dubois, Tkachuk or Keller
 
I can't really defend that.

But hey, maybe he just hasn't watched Sergachev that much and the game he's watched he played extremely well. :dunno:

I looked at his previous lists (2014 & 2015) It really isn't all that bad.
Yeah, I don't really trust RLR. Some of their scouting reports just seem way off to me, even if I do like their boldness in rankings. I like McKeen's and and Hockey Prospect better, their scouting reports are more in line with what I've seen but obviously I don't agree with all of their rankings. Button gets a lot of flak as well, but I like that he differs from the consensus, he's actually made some good calls lately, obviously had some big misses in the past because he does make ballsy rankings.
RLR often differs from the general consensus, some very funny one-liners and Woodlief does throw some curve balls out there. Like Button, i respect their opinions/time/effort and lists, but that doesn't mean you have to agree with them all the time. Both have had really perplexing opinions in the recent past.

I prefer Hockey Prospect the most, but this year, the way i see the OHL players is very different than them, when it is usually very inline as their top scouts are OHL based. I would say their ranking of the OHL defenders is nearly reversed to mine. I mean Stanley still at 21? I just don't know about that.

How many forwards do you think have a chance to play in the NHL next season?
None beyond the top 3 should be considered, beyond a short trial.
 
make a deal with Carolina and draft 13 and 23.

Any other year and I'm clamouring for two first round picks.

But to finish 3rd worst in the league and then not pick until 13? That would hurt. I really want to leave this draft with an elite prospect.
 
What's wrong with the 6th pick?

It's what I'm expecting us to get. That way if we get better it'll be gravy.

Besides there are still really solid players available @ 6.

The 4-10 picks are all on the same tier IMO.

I'm sure you also did this a million times, I just again ran the simulator at least 30 times this time, it was not to see how many times we get the 1st pick, this is to see how many times, Vancouver, Toronto, and Edmonton loses out in the lottery (which we will for sure pick 6) and I can tell you, we finished in the top 3 far more time then we finishing 6th. I think only 3 or 4 times, we ended up with 6.
 
Any other year and I'm clamouring for two first round picks.

But to finish 3rd worst in the league and then not pick until 13? That would hurt. I really want to leave this draft with an elite prospect.

If were drafting at 6 it's not elite.

What should scare anyone is Jim trading. You know he will lose badly.

Maybe stay at 6.
 
What's wrong with the 6th pick?

It's what I'm expecting us to get. That way if we get better it'll be gravy.

Besides there are still really solid players available @ 6.

The 4-10 picks are all on the same tier IMO.

That's why we need a top 3 pick.. We need an elite prospect so much more than any other team in the league. Getting a guy on 'the same tier' as 6 other teams are getting is kinda meh.
 
Bean and Sanheim were used as a shutdown pairing because Kanzig (their usual shutdown defensemen) was just too slow to handle DeBrusk & Spacek. So Bean wasn't really being utilized offensively.

Also, I have absolutely no problem with the goals that Bean scores. They are quick, accurate shots or smart plays to fake out defenders. Bean loves the short side above the shoulder spot for his wristers. It's not like those goals are necessarily "junior hockey goals". In fact I'd argue that they are very much NHL goals.

In the NHL, short side is often referred to as "the AHL" side. Wrongly or rightly, there definitely is a belief that its easier to score short side goals in the AHL or juniors, than in the NHL. So, in that sense, they kind of are "junior hockey goals".
 
New top 6...


1 Laine
2 Matthews
3 Pulj
4 Dubois
5 Tkachuk
6 Jost ... jumping on his bandwagon but I really like his game

What the hockey writers had to say about Jost.

Jost is a wonderful combination of speed, smarts and size. He sees the ice very well and is just as dangerous setting up a play as he is taking a shot. He’s also shown considerable on-ice leadership for a player of his not-so-advanced age, serving as the Vees captain this past season and also donning the C for Team Canada at recent international events. To make a long story short, he’s been an excellent player in every level he’s stepped onto the ice at and has earned the trust and respect of teammates and coaches along the way.


They also went onto say that the BCHL is an inferior league to the WHL so its harder to judge how good he is but he's proving at the U18's that he can not only compete with the best but dominate!
 
Last edited:
If were drafting at 6 it's not elite.

What should scare anyone is Jim trading. You know he will lose badly.

Maybe stay at 6.

at 6 you still have a shot at Dubois, Tkachuk, or any of the defensemen. Not that I'd necessarily call the group at 6 "elite" but the drop off between those prospects and what's available at 13 is significant. Not worth it.
 
Benning has been pretty open so far in his interviews that he is absolutely willing to trade down.

Which I think is a good idea, Bean + > Consensus 6th overall pick

Disagree. I say we keep our top 6 pick & our 33rd pick but offer Jannik Hansen for a 12 to 22 overall pick. After our top 6 pick, I'd like us to next get two of Brown, Jost, Bean, Fabbro, Johansen, Benson or Clague.
 
Disagree. I say we keep our top 6 pick & our 33rd pick but offer Jannik Hansen for a 12 to 22 overall pick. After our top 6 pick, I'd like us to next get two of Brown, Jost, Bean, Fabbro, Johansen, Benson or Clague.

you are not going to get a 12 to 22 pick for hansen. perhaps if you add in the 33rd pick you would probably be able to move up with Hansen but not alone.
 
Jost @ 6th or bust.

If we get better then I am ecstatic that one of Matthews, Laine, Pulju, Dubois, or Tkachuk will be in our prospect pool.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad