Tampa Bay - Kevin Shattenkirk
Pittsburgh - Vladimir Tarasenko
St. Louis - Jonathan Drouin, Marc-Andre Fleury (750k retained), Patric Hornqvist, Olli Maatta
Has anyone ever told you that your proposals are awful?
You know, I'm Trevor Daley's second biggest fan (shoutout to vabm8), but his skating is his first, second, and third biggest strength, and now he has a broken ankle. I'd definitely be proactive about finding a legit top-4 guy this summer.
I agree with this. And at his age...that ankle injury may sink him.
http://thethirdmanin.com/2014/10/14...-development-coach-long-time-tortorella-ally/
The Globe and Mail had a story last month about Canucks’ defenseman Alex Edler. In the story, author David Ebner noted that last season Sullivan would constantly berate Edler when mistakes were made, which apparently didn’t do much to help build Edler’s confidence or turnaround a struggling season for one of Vancouver’s top defensemen.
Maybe explains how he approached Geno the last few weeks?
So Edler doesn't like to have a coach that's hard on him, is how I read that.
Schultz has a knack for managing to not get crushed when a guy has him dead to rights. Usually advances the puck intelligently in the process of avoiding death.
I think Schultz is a really good defenseman. If we can square his defensive lapses around (which I don't think he's really had any glaring ones here), he's a middle pairing defenseman. I really wish they would use him more on the 1st powerplay unit. Infinitely better than Letang, and he being a righty, and Geno being a lefty, they can just bomb pucks between one another. We're missing an opportunity there.
Why do we want Yak? We should probably stop thinking about flashy upgrades and think about two way guys like Hagelin. This team is winning by buying into the team concept and depth scoring. I certainly want to set up Sid and Geno with offensive upgrades, but those guys need to have a brain along with an ability and willingness to buy into a 2 way game.
I'm not saying Yak isn't capable of that, but would you take that risk by moving your most valuable "expendable" asset? I certainly wouldn't.
I agree. We have the blueprint. I wouldn't bring in any guys that don't fit that, and I don't personally see how Yakupov fits that mold. Schultz would probably have some pretty good insight on him, and I'm sure if the front office were kicking the tires on Yak, they'd ask Schultz for his opinion.
Kunitz had a very respectable series. But I think Rust is the wing that makes that line work, right now. Didn't he and Malkin skate together a ton while they were both recovering from injury? They seem on the same page.
He could be a viable long term solution there if they could upgrade Malkin's LW.
Kunitz went full Orpik t his season, and that's how you know it's time to let him go. It's pretty evident Kunitz has been saving his body this season, and he's just going nuts right now. He had a hell of a series. His hands are gone, but he played great otherwise.
Full marks to Kunitz for bringing it this series, but we'd be stupid not to move him while his value's highest.
Guy's been garbage for a year and a half. This is a dream scenario to trick some gullible GM into thinking he's a net positive asset, not to reassess his value to this team.
I agree.